Was this a good reason for the Matrix to ask to be traded?
Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
Was this a good reason for the Matrix to ask to be traded?
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 847
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 23, 2008
- thamadkant
- Suns Forum Picker of Cherries
- Posts: 16,916
- And1: 8,599
- Joined: Jan 06, 2007
-
Cash wrote:I like how Kerr thinks neither Kobe nor LeBron deserve the max.
I think because, Kerr believes that prime "Big men" > Prime perimeter players.
I agree with him with Duncan.
KG is halfway between Duncan, Marion/Artest.
Very good defender/versatile, is a seven footer. But doesnt play inside... doesnt dominate in the paint.
Players who control the paint controls the game... true this generation and most generations... with MJ and the Bulls being kryptonite to that theory.
-
- Forum Mod - Raptors
- Posts: 91,984
- And1: 31,588
- Joined: Oct 14, 2003
-
thamadkant wrote:Players who control the paint controls the game... true this generation and most generations... with MJ and the Bulls being kryptonite to that theory.
Notably, though, MJ DID control the paint. He and Pippen, particularly during the second three-peat, scored a LOT from the low post and that team had ridiculously tight defensive rotations that locked down the inside.
So the same basic principle applies, even though they didn't have a dominant shot-blocker.
- b-ball forever
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,737
- And1: 498
- Joined: Mar 17, 2006
- Location: So long Jason Kidd
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,050
- And1: 0
- Joined: May 13, 2007
"What people don't understand, Shawn was gone," D'Antoni said. "I mean, he was going to go. There were some problems with contracts and all that."
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2 ... gets-fall/
pretty interesting, the Suns had to move Shawn or they would've lost something without getting nothing in return.
- thamadkant
- Suns Forum Picker of Cherries
- Posts: 16,916
- And1: 8,599
- Joined: Jan 06, 2007
-
Pound for pound.. they use it for boxing a lot, to measure fair fights.
In basketball, its not used, but its more for metaphorical reasons.
Jordan's post game is pretty much unstoppable.
Those other players under "6'9" category can be classified as "great" post players too. My statement was exagerrated, but Jordan can play the whole game at the post and still score 50 points. How many of those guys can say that? But sure, yes those guys have a deeper aresenal down the post as opposed to Jordan just having uncanny ways to score.
Barkley is an all-rounder, but yes he does play the post well.. But he is pretty big and wide and his reach is comparable to guys 6'10~6'11 in height....
In basketball, its not used, but its more for metaphorical reasons.
Jordan's post game is pretty much unstoppable.
Those other players under "6'9" category can be classified as "great" post players too. My statement was exagerrated, but Jordan can play the whole game at the post and still score 50 points. How many of those guys can say that? But sure, yes those guys have a deeper aresenal down the post as opposed to Jordan just having uncanny ways to score.
Barkley is an all-rounder, but yes he does play the post well.. But he is pretty big and wide and his reach is comparable to guys 6'10~6'11 in height....
-
- Forum Mod - Raptors
- Posts: 91,984
- And1: 31,588
- Joined: Oct 14, 2003
-
thamadkant wrote:Pound for pound.. they use it for boxing a lot, to measure fair fights.
In basketball, its not used, but its more for metaphorical reasons.
Sure, but it's still a stupid phrase in basketball because saying someone's the best "pound for pound" implies that they're better than the bigger guys, which is blatantly incorrect.
Jordan's post game didn't approach Kareem, Wilt, Shaq, Dream and those boys, regardless of metaphor. He had basically two very good moves in the post: the turnaround fadeaway and the cross-pivot duck-under that he used to get hanging shots in front of the rim from the high-post elbow setup.
Those other players under "6'9" category can be classified as "great" post players too. My statement was exagerrated, but Jordan can play the whole game at the post and still score 50 points. How many of those guys can say that? But sure, yes those guys have a deeper aresenal down the post as opposed to Jordan just having uncanny ways to score.
Actually no, Jordan couldn't play the whole game in the post and still score 50 points; as he aged, he relied heavily on the post-up game and his increasingly effective mid-range jumper, so that's definitely a mischaracterization of his game.
Barkley is an all-rounder, but yes he does play the post well.. But he is pretty big and wide and his reach is comparable to guys 6'10~6'11 in height....
Yeah, and he also had a nasty mid-range jumper to go with great hops. He (and Mark Jackson) are also responsible for the 5-second rule, of course. Barkley just pushed you from the perimeter to close to the rim and then scored.
- JohnVancouver
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,016
- And1: 236
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
- Location: Vancouver, BC
You know, if Shawn - already the highest paid member of the team, didn't feel he was getting enough respect or credit, then how was a raise going to fix that?
Great player, seems like a really nice guy as well, always played his best for the Suns and came every day and every game ready to work ... bus like they say on Dr. Phil, he's got esteem issues
The other side of that is, if Shawn is a max contract guy, why hasn't adding him to the Heat turned things around, even a little? You'd think he'd mean at least a couple more wins, right?
No knock on Shawn, just that he has some odd ideas.
Great player, seems like a really nice guy as well, always played his best for the Suns and came every day and every game ready to work ... bus like they say on Dr. Phil, he's got esteem issues
The other side of that is, if Shawn is a max contract guy, why hasn't adding him to the Heat turned things around, even a little? You'd think he'd mean at least a couple more wins, right?
No knock on Shawn, just that he has some odd ideas.
- PeTBuLL
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,347
- And1: 6
- Joined: Aug 29, 2005
thamadkant wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
I think because, Kerr believes that prime "Big men" > Prime perimeter players.
I agree with him with Duncan.
KG is halfway between Duncan, Marion/Artest.
Very good defender/versatile, is a seven footer. But doesnt play inside... doesnt dominate in the paint.
Players who control the paint controls the game... true this generation and most generations... with MJ and the Bulls being kryptonite to that theory.
And that