Page 1 of 8
Phoenix Suns vs Golden State Warriors [Game 81]
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 1:04 am
by JustMoe
@
When: Monday, April 14th, 2008
Where: US Airways Center - Phoenix, Arizona
When exactly: 10:00pm, Eastern Time (4:00am CET)
TV: ? (information not available yet)
The lineups:
The Suns
Starting 5:
C: Shaquille O'Neal (#32 / 7'1'' / 325)
PF: Amare Stoudemire (#1 / 6'10'' / 249)
SF: Grant Hill (#33 / 6'8'' / 225)
SG: Raja Bell (#19 / 6'5'' / 215)
PG: Steve Nash (#13 / 6'3'' / 178)
Bench:
G: Leandro Barbosa (#10 / 6'3'' / 202)
F-C: Boris Diaw (#3 / 6'8'' / 235)
G: Gordan Giricek (#2 / 6'6'' / 220)
F-C: Brian Skinner (#54 / 6'9'' / 255)
The Warriors
Starting 5:
C: Andris Biedrins (#15 / 6'11'' / 230)
PF: Al Harrington (#3 / 6'9'' / 250)
SF: Stephen Jackson (#1 / 6'8'' / 218)
SG: Monta Ellis (#8 / 6'3'' / 177)
PG: Baron Davis (#5 / 6'3'' / 215)
Bench:
F: Mickael Pietrus (#2 / 6'6'' / 215)
G-F: Kelenna Azubuike (#7 / 6'5'' / 220)
F: Matt Barnes (#22 / 6'7'' / 226)
F: Austin Croshere (#44 / 6'10'' / 235)
GOOO SUNS!!!
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 2:52 am
by The Nash Era
This game is absolutely pointless now.
Don't play em too much
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 2:55 am
by The Diesel
How should D'Antoni approach this game?
Just rest the starters?
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 2:56 am
by garrick
I think he should perfect his offensive sets and get the team clicking and then in the second half incorporate the bench players.
Is there any point in winning these next two games?
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 2:57 am
by KJ7
If we were rolling and knew what we were doing I wouldn't mind benching the starters. But it's quite clear we are struggling to beat good play-off teams not names San Antonio since Shaq came in.
GSW is a play-off caliber team. We should be taking this seriously, if nothing else as a warm-up to the play-offs. We've got alot of work to do considering the play-offs are so close. This game could go a long way to helping us.
Remember Dallas resting players against GSW last season? They came out flat and got done!
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 3:20 am
by BurningHeart
Yes, can't we still end up with the fourth/fifth?
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 3:27 am
by Never Fear 33 Is Here
The damn sky doesn't even care anymore.
GET SOME NUTS!!!
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 5:12 am
by albasuna
I say we play our starters 28 minutes max. Maybe even rest Nash if he's still banged up on monday.
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:07 am
by nevetsov
BurningHeart wrote:Yes, can't we still end up with the fourth/fifth?
It's possible we finish #5 above the Spurs, but it's unlikely..
If we win out, which is possible against GSW and Portland, we'd finish up
55-27.
Houston would have to go 0-3 to finish 54-26 which is unlikely; They should beat either the Clippers and/ or Denver and finish either with
55 or 56 wins. And now they
own the tiebreak over us.
Utah have tough games against Denver, Houston and SA but are assured a
#4 seed at worst anyway.
LA already have
55 wins with 2 games to play and
own the tiebreaker over us.
If SA go 1-2 they would finish
55-27 with the tiebreak against them, thus dropping them to
#6 but they would have to lose two of @LAL, @SAC and vUTAH.
So keep an eye on the LA/ SA game, if LA win then they may finish with a #1 seed with SA dropping to #6.
If SA win, then LA would likely finish #2 with the Spurs #5. Either way, they would not meet until the conference finals

Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:17 am
by nevetsov
The two most likely scenarios are:
8 Den @
1 LaL
4 Utah v
5 Phenix
7 Dall @
2 NOH
3 Hou v
6 SAS
OR
8 Den @
1 NOH
4 Utah
5 SA
7 Dall @
2 LAL
3 Hou v
6 Pho
I think it's starting to look like, if we make the WCSF, that's we'll be playing in LA.. I think it may be better to finish 6th and let Dallas have first crack at them. I think that's the best matchup for them, and if they do happen to get the upset, we'd have HCA advantage against them.
That is dependant on the Spurs winning in LA though, so..
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:29 am
by BurningHeart
So we're rooting for San Antonio? LOL.
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:49 am
by albasuna
For all we know Houston can end up taking the #1 seed
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 6:43 pm
by That Nicka
Who has the tie breaker between SAS and Houston? they split their meetings but SAS has better division record while Houston has better conference record....
I think the most likely scenario is
Hornets/Lakers
Lakers/Hornets
Spurs
Jazz
Rockets
Suns
Mavs
Nuggets
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 9:55 pm
by dm17415
Definitely don't rest the starters as many have said experiment a bit with different offensive/defensive sets and get the team ready for playoffs.
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 11:05 pm
by -SDU-
personally if we have to play the lakers, i would rather play the lakers sooner rather than later
before bynum settles back in
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 2:22 am
by Never Fear 33 Is Here
That Nicka wrote:Who has the tie breaker between SAS and Houston? they split their meetings but SAS has better division record while Houston has better conference record....
I think the most likely scenario is
Hornets/Lakers
Lakers/Hornets
Spurs
Jazz
Rockets
Suns
Mavs
Nuggets
Houston does. It goes as follows:
Record
Conference Record
Division Record
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 3:09 am
by BRINGTHEPAIN
I just want to play the Lakers in the first round. Anyone else will be a major disappointment, but if not the Lakers then Spurs.
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 6:46 am
by BurningHeart
Is there a way we can stay at six while SA slips to 4 or 5?
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 6:00 pm
by JustOneFix
In the name of Nuggets fans sanity, please beat the living **** out of GSW.
Don't you **** dare to rest your starters!!
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2008 8:23 pm
by ranlamjon
play it smart, rest your starting 5.