My main concerns about the President are the following:
- A grasp of the subtle power of negotiation, speech and politics in foreign policy, something that has been devastatingly lacking in the last 8 years.
- An economic policy that revalues the dollar, encourages saving and salary pay (as opposed to living by investing).
- A concrete, pragmatic, non-regulatory, market-oriented means of reducing oil usage (good news being that both candidates basically share the same opinion on how to do this).
- A reworking of the medical care system.
- Someone who will inspire Americans to get their collective s--t together.
A few quick reasons I'm going with Obama/Biden:
- Republican leadership doesn't need to feel rewarded/redeemed for the
last 8 years.
- Obama will
lower my taxes (and most peoples') by bringing them to rates that roughly correspond with those that Reagan instituted after Carter, and that Clinton had; when taxes are lowered to extremes for the upper class (by both Bushes) and for capital gains, we've consistently seen the result: recession.
- He and Biden have been remarkably prescient with foreign affairs. Obama rightly predicted the problems we were headed into with Iraq, and rightly predicted what Maliki would want to end it. Biden has been quoted as warning that Bush's obsession with missile defense was irrational given that most of the threats to the U.S. were "
in the belly of a plane" -- and he made that critique as the
Chair of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations on September 10th, 2001. He's still the chair of that Committee.
- Obama thinks very carefully. His answers are well thought-out, he constantly consults experts with whom he doesn't always agree. His policy papers are hundreds of pages long, cite sources, quote experts, and don't lie.
- His plan for the medical system is expensive, but it's expensive because it forces a desperately-needed complete reworking of that system. Moreover, his plans contain
very specific proposals on how to get the job done (as opposed to McCain, see below). The current setup is so patchwork that it barely functions. The government's basic job is to do things that don't naturally happen via market and social forces. The current medical care system is a shoddy mess; by forcing all providers to use the same system, to electronicize their records, and to interoperate, we'll save a lot of money and lives in the long run. Moreover, once the system is in place, the Obama plan allows a great deal of private enterprise to function within the system; it isn't just a big government bureaucracy that runs it.
A few quick reasons I won't vote for McCain:
- I like McCain when he takes on unpopular causes, angering the status quo (i.e., immigration reform, campaign finance). Unfortunately, while that mindset is good for a Senator, it's terrible for a President. His stance on Georgia was irresponsible because he knew he couldn't back up his battle cries (especially
kicking Russian out of the G8); the Georgian president even
called his bluff.
- The McCain medical plan is to privatize it, and give families a $5,000 tax credit on medical expenses, but does absolutely nothing to fix the system that makes the credit necessary, or give specifics on how it plans to put reasonable limits on premiums other than to "
work with the best experiences of the states." It's a band-aid on cancer.
- Lowering taxes during wartime is spectacularly irresponsible, especially with a huge debt already piled up, and the Dollar going down as a result.
- Being a POW does not qualify you as an expert on the economy, foreign affairs, or anything except for what the definition of torture is - and
you'd think he'd oppose it within the CIA without qualification. War heroes don't cheapen their service by using it
as a political bludgeon to counter any critique, no matter how outlandishly unrelated.
- Be honest: If Palin were a man, would she have been selected? She is a rising star, and I wish she had stayed in Alaska to continue her good work, but a few years as the mayor of a town with 1/10th the number of students at my old college (U of Az) and two years governing a state with 1/2 the number of people in my city (Tucson) does not a Vice President make. And I'm really not impressed that McCain would risk an incompetent person becoming President.
Finally, regarding Obama's charisma: Don't underestimate the power of love for a President. Eisenhower (my favorite President), JFK, FDR, Teddy, Reagan, and other great Presidents didn't always have great policy, but they inspired the American people. Almost nobody is inspired by Bush to be better, more community-oriented people. As charismatic as he was, few people were inspired by the used car salesman vibe that Clinton often exuded. I was born in 1980; I don't remember much about the first Bush, so
I have never felt very inspired a standing President. Inspired people - people who genuinely love their leader, be it in an office or in politics - work better. They achieve better.
I would argue that the long line of tough American-values work ethic that lasted from FDR's handling of the Great Depression, all the way through JFK, was partly because of the inspiration of the standing Presidents. Those Fireside Chats had as much to do with picking ourselves up as the economy did. Ditto WWII. Ditto the early part of the Cold War. But Vietnam - well, that didn't inspire, did it? Neither did Carter. And ever since Nixon or so, Boomers never really trusted a politician. And their children inherited that distrust, not that Clinton or Bush did much to change minds.
Only Americans can make America great. Only inspired Americans will make a great America. Elect the man that can with words as well as deeds, inspire.
Back to lurker mode.
