RealGM

Kerr is obviously shaking things up to better position ourselves against the West. Well, we now have the weakest bench of any playoff team.


Get Marbury. He can still average 12/7 in 20-25 mins. Dragic cannot.

Let's go for it.

Why not?! LoL, no thanks. Tats on head = crazy. I.E. Marbury, Tyson.

Seriously....why not???

Lol. It's like 2010 is the Mayan Armageddon, at least it is for Kerr. He's completely turned this franchise inside out.


I'm just saying, let's just get naked and dance...

Why not?

Nash + 2009 & 2012 first round pick for Marbury

when he gets waived then yes. NO way in hell im going to trade for him. the decision on marbury was suppose to be made soon. There is nothing else out their we can bring in that would help.

yeah, when he's bought out we should sign him.

Nash/Marbury
Richardson/Barbosa
Hill/Barnes
Amare/Amundson
Shaq/Lopez

Oh, not the amount of flaming I thought I'd see on this thread, but I completely agree with the OP, except that we should SIGN him instead of TRADE for him =] like RSAVAJ said, that will be our depth chart, and frankly, no team in the NBA can beat us (except I'd think we'd play Dudley over Amundson at the 4).

Marbury's fate is supposed to be decided by friday, and the Suns have to sign another player by friday, so you never know.

Itmotep wrote:Why not?! LoL, no thanks. Tats on head = crazy. I.E. Marbury, Tyson.

too funny but also scary true.

get him, just do it and think too much bout it. what can go wrong??
if he turns out bad don´t give him pt... like dragic ain´t getting pt.
if we can have him for the vet´s miniumum do it...

I thought Marbury's fate was suppose to be decided like last Monday, what's up with that? Didn't somebody say they waive Marbury till next year so it doesn't show up as a loss on Knicks 'yearly financial report or something?

Itmotep wrote:Why not?! LoL, no thanks. Tats on head = crazy. I.E. Marbury, Tyson.

and Bam Bam Bigelo

oops No need for 2 Bam Bams

eastsidecrossover wrote:when he gets waived then yes. NO way in hell im going to trade for him. the decision on marbury was suppose to be made soon. There is nothing else out their we can bring in that would help.

+1

Frank Lee wrote:

Itmotep wrote:Why not?! LoL, no thanks. Tats on head = crazy. I.E. Marbury, Tyson.

and Bam Bam Bigelo

R.I.P Bam Bam...

Ya know what? The more that I think about it, the more I think it would actually be a very good idea to pick up Marbury as a free agent. IF, IF...He is willing to backup Nash and maybe even start some games when Nash wants to rest or maybe miss a few games like Shaq. To rest up ya know. He has a good shot, good D, and can play really well. He just needs to get his head out of his arse and play ball. He has what it takes...Just needs some good people around him. I think the fans ultimately will be happy if we get him again.

can we just sign a 10 day contract to some d-leaguer till marbury is bought out?

flanpaw42 wrote:can we just sign a 10 day contract to some d-leaguer till marbury is bought out?

yep. and lets keep the 10day contracts coming til hes free

w/ marbury as backup pg we'd kill any team!

Marubury would be an excellent player if we could get him. He's still a very good PG but i have to question his attitude towards basketball. If he's just about the money, I doubt we would be able to offer more than a vet min. If he's going to play because he wants to win, then there are a few better contenders than us.

One thing we should never do is trade for him, because whatever trade we come up with, we'll likely be the loser out of the deal.