Is Grant Hill Available?

hiphop1 · Post #1 » by **hiphop1** » Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:52 am

Just wondering if he is for trade or if there has been any rumors of a buyout? Seeing as you guys seem to be blowing it up I dont think he would want to stick around for a rebuild. Just wondering any info would be greatly appreciated. THANK YOU!

WTFsunsFTW · Post #2 » by **WTFsunsFTW** » Fri Feb 13, 2009 1:07 am

Untouchable. He has also stated that if he gets traded he will auto-retire.

Post #3 » by **TASTIC** » Fri Feb 13, 2009 1:17 am

I think he's married

And NF33iH has dibs in case he switches sides...

In all seriousness though, besides players on their rookie contracts, he might be the best bargain in the NBA

Christ listen to Marion try and talk...poor guy has a starter/slur thing goin on...

-SDU- · Post #4 » by **-SDU-** » Fri Feb 13, 2009 1:17 am

wasnt there talk of a hill for JJ reddick trade this year?

hill isnt untouchable, kerr has said that noone besides nash is - but i do agree that i doubt hill would play for a new team either

hiphop1 · Post #5 » by **hiphop1** » Fri Feb 13, 2009 1:21 am

Kool I was just wondering thought he could help the Celts bench. Thanks for the info.

contract · Post #6 » by **contract** » Fri Feb 13, 2009 1:33 am

WTFsunsFTW wrote:Untouchable. He has also stated that if he gets traded he will auto-retire.

That was back in December. He may have changed his mind by now with the current state of the Suns and a chance to win a title in Boston.

Mr. Sun · Post #7 » by **Mr. Sun** » Fri Feb 13, 2009 2:40 am

-SDU- wrote:hill isnt untouchable, kerr has said that noone besides nash is - but i do agree that i doubt hill would play for a new team either

No no no, Kerr said no one is untouchable other than the untouchables.

WTFsunsFTW · Post #8 » by **WTFsunsFTW** » Fri Feb 13, 2009 7:17 am

Let's just say California has a better chance of floating off into the pacific than seeing Nash, Hill or Barbosa in another uniform.

TXSun · Post #9 » by **TXSun** » Fri Feb 13, 2009 7:18 am

Mr. Sun wrote:
-SDU- wrote:hill isnt untouchable, kerr has said that noone besides nash is - but i do agree that i doubt hill would play for a new team either

No no no, Kerr said no one is untouchable other than the untouchables.

yeah Nash and Hill are part of the untouchables.

krac36 · Post #10 » by **krac36** » Fri Feb 13, 2009 11:25 am

WTFsunsFTW wrote:Let's just say California has a better chance of floating off into the pacific than seeing Nash, Hill or Barbosa in another uniform.

Some people are saying that Barbs will be traded soon and i dont see why not.