Page 1 of 1

Why not Sam I am?

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:58 pm
by JJ13
Any thoughts on bringing in Sam Cassel for the rest of the season? Is this a "no way", not sure what his status is other than being old. He's better than Dragic though.

Re: Why not Sam I am?

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 5:06 pm
by jazzy_jeff
I'd love to bring in Cassell. I think he may have some big games left in him

Re: Why not Sam I am?

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 5:26 pm
by TXSun
I'll take the risk on a proven vet like "sam I am".

Re: Why not Sam I am?

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 5:31 pm
by SideSwipe
I would take that risk also. Jwill or Cassel, I'm okay with either. Cassel knows Boston inside and out, which would be an advantage when we get to the Finals....8-)

Re: Why not Sam I am?

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 5:41 pm
by jazzy_jeff
I could only see them signing Sam if Nash is going to be out for a while, though.
They seem to be making a committment to bringing along Dragic now, which future-wise is a good thing.
Cassell might be a good quick fix to get Suns to the playoffs. But if Suns are only going to sign one guy, isn't it better at this point to get a bigger body?

Re: Why not Sam I am?

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 7:38 pm
by jazzy_jeff
SideSwipe wrote:I would take that risk also. Jwill or Cassel, I'm okay with either. Cassel knows Boston inside and out, which would be an advantage when we get to the Finals....8-)


:lol: And he was on the Celtics team that beat the Suns first-round opponent, LA!
But seriously, Cassell's a winner. The more I think about, the more I like this idea.

Why Boston -- who are doing just fine as is, to begin with -- would cut Cassell to bring in a malcontent like Starbury is beyond me.

Re: Why not Sam I am?

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:42 pm
by realsunsfan
jazzy_jeff wrote:
SideSwipe wrote:I would take that risk also. Jwill or Cassel, I'm okay with either. Cassel knows Boston inside and out, which would be an advantage when we get to the Finals....8-)


:lol: And he was on the Celtics team that beat the Suns first-round opponent, LA!
But seriously, Cassell's a winner. The more I think about, the more I like this idea.

Why Boston -- who are doing just fine as is, to begin with -- would cut Cassell to bring in a malcontent like Starbury is beyond me.


I'm actually on the fence about Cassel, I think he would be a good addition especially in the half court play of the playoffs, but how much does he really have left in the tank ???????

Re: Why not Sam I am?

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 9:54 pm
by pidi
before we sign a player who is that washed up like sam i´d prefer smush parker, step marbury or any other but not a amost 40 year old pg...
btw i think we need another pf. we can´t suck the life off ghill by letting him play pf. it´s ridicolous that we don´t face to sign a vet pf... is antoine walker or samaki walker still available??

Re: Why not Sam I am?

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:43 pm
by jazzy_jeff
realsunsfan wrote:I'm actually on the fence about Cassel, I think he would be a good addition especially in the half court play of the playoffs, but how much does he really have left in the tank ???????


Have to get to the playoffs first before we start worrying about that.

But I think he would be a good addition. Watching him in the playoffs last year -- albiet in a reduced role -- he didn't look like he'd slowed down much
He was still logging starting minutes for the Clips last season before he went to the Celtics

Re: Why not Sam I am?

Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 10:51 pm
by jazzy_jeff
pidi wrote:before we sign a player who is that washed up like sam i´d prefer smush parker, step marbury or any other but not a amost 40 year old pg...
btw i think we need another pf. we can´t suck the life off ghill by letting him play pf. it´s ridicolous that we don´t face to sign a vet pf... is antoine walker or samaki walker still available??


I agree about getting a PF first. But we don't want Starbury. With all the drama surrounding this team right now, he's the last thing the Suns need

Re: Why not Sam I am?

Posted: Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:25 am
by lilfishi22
We definitely need a PF first, then a PG. I'd like JWill here, I think he's still got a lot of game left, especially if he plays behind Nash.