ImageImageImage

Game 74: Suns at Sacramento

Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22

User avatar
Natural11
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,145
And1: 2,760
Joined: Nov 27, 2008

Re: Game 74: Suns at Sacramento 

Post#81 » by Natural11 » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:26 am

I think that Bell+Diaw for JRich might be the worst trade of this season.
User avatar
JohnVancouver
General Manager
Posts: 9,016
And1: 236
Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: Game 74: Suns at Sacramento 

Post#82 » by JohnVancouver » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:27 am

the only thing that made this worthwhile to watch was that bizarre statement fromthe Kings announcer:

"He's called the Big Cactus because if you get too close you get stung. On the other hand, if you squeeze a big cactus you get a lot of fluid."

That is ... disturbing
"Deng and Mozgov was some 1980s Clippers sh*t. So, so dumb" - Sedale Threatt

"If you can't get banned for threatening to rape a mod, what can you get banned for?" Jigga_Man/2013

"Everybody love Everybody." - Jackie Moon
User avatar
mrblunt
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,772
And1: 1,077
Joined: Mar 15, 2009

Re: Game 74: Suns at Sacramento 

Post#83 » by mrblunt » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:27 am

i always knew hiring a tnt announcer for a gm was a terrible idea steve kerr :lol:
Kings of The Court
Image
User avatar
GetMoney
Analyst
Posts: 3,312
And1: 1,035
Joined: Dec 14, 2006

Re: Game 74: Suns at Sacramento 

Post#84 » by GetMoney » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:27 am

what the hell just happened
ImageImage. . . AND STILL
The Infamous1 wrote:It's only so long Weak teams can pretend
dantian
Starter
Posts: 2,015
And1: 27
Joined: Jun 23, 2005

Re: Game 74: Suns at Sacramento 

Post#85 » by dantian » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:28 am

Nash 31/14/5 in 42 min. What a warrior! But it's not a shame to lose to superstar Beno Udrih. Geez, why didn't we sign this guy when we had a chance!
User avatar
rsavaj
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,863
And1: 2,767
Joined: May 09, 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

Re: Game 74: Suns at Sacramento 

Post#86 » by rsavaj » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:28 am

Natural11 wrote:I think that Bell+Diaw for JRich might be the worst trade of this season.


+1

I'm going to go back and watch some 04-05, 05-06, 06-07 Suns highlights now...
BurningHeart
General Manager
Posts: 9,631
And1: 1,486
Joined: Jun 02, 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Game 74: Suns at Sacramento 

Post#87 » by BurningHeart » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:30 am

rsavaj wrote:
Natural11 wrote:I think that Bell+Diaw for JRich might be the worst trade of this season.


+1

I'm going to go back and watch some 04-05, 05-06, 06-07 Suns highlights now...


Sharing is caring.
User avatar
albasuna
Rookie
Posts: 1,246
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 26, 2004

Re: Game 74: Suns at Sacramento 

Post#88 » by albasuna » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:30 am

Calvin Klein wrote:The sad part is that I don't really think Stoudemire would really change this situation.



are you kidding me? this has to be a joke right?
garrick
Head Coach
Posts: 6,383
And1: 3,116
Joined: Dec 02, 2006
     

Re: Game 74: Suns at Sacramento 

Post#89 » by garrick » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:31 am

Stat has always abused the Kings big men so that statement is ridiculous.
User avatar
rsavaj
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,863
And1: 2,767
Joined: May 09, 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

Re: Game 74: Suns at Sacramento 

Post#90 » by rsavaj » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:31 am

BurningHeart wrote:
rsavaj wrote:
Natural11 wrote:I think that Bell+Diaw for JRich might be the worst trade of this season.


+1

I'm going to go back and watch some 04-05, 05-06, 06-07 Suns highlights now...


Sharing is caring.


I don't have any tapes that I can upload unfortunately, but there's a crapload of stuff on youtube. Sadly like <5 videos about the 04-05 season unfortunately.
User avatar
vincecarter4pres
RealGM
Posts: 50,448
And1: 3,442
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: New Jeruz
Contact:
     

Re: Game 74: Suns at Sacramento 

Post#91 » by vincecarter4pres » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:32 am

Image
Rich Rane wrote:I think we're all missing the point here. vc4pres needs to stop watching games.
User avatar
rsavaj
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,863
And1: 2,767
Joined: May 09, 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

Re: Game 74: Suns at Sacramento 

Post#92 » by rsavaj » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:34 am

vincecarter4pres wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1H3eKMgvjY&feature=related


Very fitting.
garrick
Head Coach
Posts: 6,383
And1: 3,116
Joined: Dec 02, 2006
     

Re: Game 74: Suns at Sacramento 

Post#93 » by garrick » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:34 am

I think losing both Stat and Barbs is just a bit too much to overcome, now if we still had Diaw that would be different but hindsight is 20/20.
The only positive I see in all this is if we still own our draft pick this year and we somehow get lucky and get to move up in the draft through luck.
Jdiddy701
RealGM
Posts: 10,147
And1: 6,555
Joined: Jun 05, 2006

Re: Game 74: Suns at Sacramento 

Post#94 » by Jdiddy701 » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:35 am

Good thing I have some 04-05 season games on my computer :)

Nash and Shaq are the only studs on the team. And to the dude that said Amare wouldn't make a difference to this.. shutup.
User avatar
Calvin Klein
RealGM
Posts: 14,251
And1: 8,127
Joined: May 20, 2008
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Contact:
   

Re: Game 74: Suns at Sacramento 

Post#95 » by Calvin Klein » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:35 am

albasuna wrote:
Calvin Klein wrote:The sad part is that I don't really think Stoudemire would really change this situation.



are you kidding me? this has to be a joke right?



Just one game wouldn't change much.

The Kings are the worst team in the league. The Suns even without Amare should win easily. 35 points in each of the first 3 quarters is pathetic.
User avatar
rsavaj
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 24,863
And1: 2,767
Joined: May 09, 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona

Re: Game 74: Suns at Sacramento 

Post#96 » by rsavaj » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:36 am

Jdiddy701 wrote:Good thing I have some 04-05 season games on my computer :)

Nash and Shaq are the only studs on the team. And to the dude that said Amare wouldn't make a difference to this.. shutup.


Did you torrent them? I would love to acquire them somehow so if you could direct me as to where you got them I'd be high fiving you through the interwebz.
Biff
Veteran
Posts: 2,509
And1: 1,305
Joined: Jun 10, 2007
Contact:
 

Re: Game 74: Suns at Sacramento 

Post#97 » by Biff » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:37 am

You guys are completely ignoring Dudley in the Diaw Bell trade. That guy is a stud. He definitely helps make up for all the asinine plays Richardson makes.
"Now everybody wanna play for the heat and the Lakers? Let's go back to being competitive and going at these peoples!" - Kevin Durant
User avatar
tac45
Junior
Posts: 329
And1: 2
Joined: May 21, 2004
Contact:
   

Re: Game 74: Suns at Sacramento 

Post#98 » by tac45 » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:37 am

Natural11 wrote:I think that Bell+Diaw for JRich might be the worst trade of this season.


they **** should have fired porter before and everything would be okay, i am so pissed right now i cant even go to sleep.its 5 am in germany and i want to **** kick my notebook. against the kings?!!?AGAINST THE KINGS?!?!?!LOOOOSING AGAINST THE QUEENS?!!?!?!? cooooooome ooooooooonnnn...

we were so lucky that dallas lost against the cavs, okay their motivation maybe was to set their record n ****, but at least they gave as an opportunity to not fade away from the 8 spot...man i am so angry.. were is the heart?!?!why keepin dudley for so long in the 4th?i mean the guy is a hustler, but man we need points... we have absolut no D...i really mean NO D AT ALL!!!!except for hill and sometimes lou, there is nobody ( barbs is injured so i dont count him in ) who plays D... that is so **** sad...this is an 1st class team, let's be honest.. but they wont do nothing.. i simply can'T stan it...i cant stand it because, in my eyes they dont fight! they dont show some heart and balls when its time to...it cant be possible to play such a wack D.. i really cant get it..i am sorry but i cant understand it.. no way..
Stiinta nu moare!
Jdiddy701
RealGM
Posts: 10,147
And1: 6,555
Joined: Jun 05, 2006

Re: Game 74: Suns at Sacramento 

Post#99 » by Jdiddy701 » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:40 am

rsavaj wrote:
Jdiddy701 wrote:Good thing I have some 04-05 season games on my computer :)

Nash and Shaq are the only studs on the team. And to the dude that said Amare wouldn't make a difference to this.. shutup.


Did you torrent them? I would love to acquire them somehow so if you could direct me as to where you got them I'd be high fiving you through the interwebz.


Well I torrented some back then, and I place them on data disks so I can always have them. My favorite ones I watch here and there are when Suns beat Lakers being down 13 with like 4 mins left in game and Q hits a buzzer beater, Amare's career high, Nash scores 48 in dallas (playoffs), Suns go to OT with Cavs cuz big Z hits a 3 haha. I wish I hadn't deleted some of the memphis series so I can see how Stro looked back then.
User avatar
albasuna
Rookie
Posts: 1,246
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 26, 2004

Re: Game 74: Suns at Sacramento 

Post#100 » by albasuna » Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:40 am

Calvin Klein wrote:
albasuna wrote:
Calvin Klein wrote:The sad part is that I don't really think Stoudemire would really change this situation.



are you kidding me? this has to be a joke right?



Just one game wouldn't change much.

The Kings are the worst team in the league. The Suns even without Amare should win easily. 35 points in each of the first 3 quarters is pathetic.



What? I thought we were arguing about if Amare would help beat the Kings. Anyways what you said is right the Suns should beat the kings but considering the situation and variables, they ended up losing. We just got humbled by the Kings.

Return to Phoenix Suns