Page 1 of 1

and after all was sad and done, 1 game was the difference

Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 5:59 am
by jazzy_jeff
That blown OT loss to Utah to and a half weeks ago,

If the Suns won that, they're in the playoffs today.

Hard to believe that despite everything that went wrong, one game was the difference.

:dontknow:

Re: and after all was sad and done, 1 game was the difference

Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 6:25 am
by BurningHeart
Two games.

Re: and after all was sad and done, 1 game was the difference

Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 6:31 am
by MaryvalesFinest
One drafting spot can make a difference also, think of it this way. The Suns will get the #14 pick and a possible chance at a top 3 pick with Amare and the rest of the team comming back healthy next season so if they choose to keep the same team intact they will get a solid player while on the other hand who ever got #8 in the west will get stuck with the #20 or so pick and most likely lose in the first round.

Re: and after all was sad and done, 1 game was the difference

Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 7:31 am
by Vernon Maxwell
yeah, think of the amount of money we receive from selling the 14th instead of the 20th.

Re: and after all was sad and done, 1 game was the difference

Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 8:38 am
by jazzy_jeff
BurningHeart wrote:Two games.


If the Suns win that game, it's also a Utah loss and the difference in the tiebreaker. That's what separates this team from the playoffs

Re: and after all was sad and done, 1 game was the difference

Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 9:00 am
by albasuna
Utah 48 wins
Suns 46 wins

if the suns had won...
utah 47 wins
suns 47 wins + tiebreaker

Re: and after all was sad and done, 1 game was the difference

Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 9:10 am
by BurningHeart
albasuna wrote:Utah 48 wins
Suns 46 wins

if the suns had won...
utah 47 wins

suns 47 wins + tiebreaker


Yeah, my bad.

Man, that pisses me off even more.

Re: and after all was sad and done, 1 game was the difference

Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 8:43 pm
by The Hypnotoad
We really weren't that bad of a team when all was said and done. We just lost a LOT of winnable games on late buzzer beaters, plus Amare being gone. Man, we could have competed this season but a lot of BS happened. Starting with that idiot coach Porter.

Re: and after all was sad and done, 1 game was the difference

Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 2:36 am
by TXSun
that loss to Utah in OT and the dagger by Mason Jr. at the buzzer at home. 1 freaking game!!

Re: and after all was sad and done, 1 game was the difference

Posted: Fri Apr 17, 2009 5:59 am
by jazzy_jeff
Although if they had pulled off their 8-0 run to close the season they set as their goal before Houston game, they still would have missed playoffs by losing tiebreaker

Re: and after all was sad and done, 1 game was the difference

Posted: Sat Apr 18, 2009 1:38 pm
by Frank Lee
jazzy_jeff wrote:That blown OT loss to Utah to and a half weeks ago,

If the Suns won that, they're in the playoffs today.

Hard to believe that despite everything that went wrong, one game was the difference.

:dontknow:



teams that barely make it into the playoffs usually have very little difficulty getting out of them.

This was not a contending team at any point of the season. The pooch was screwed from day one and the rogering continued via the front orfice. Y'all might miss the playoff entertainment...but I think we have spared ourselves a public nuetering.

Re: and after all was sad and done, 1 game was the difference

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:14 am
by BurningHeart
If we had Amare, we'd be a contending team with Gentry running the show.

Re: and after all was sad and done, 1 game was the difference

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 10:49 am
by nevetsov
^^ Amen BH.

Re: and after all was sad and done, 1 game was the difference

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 12:03 pm
by The Diesel
If we had Amare, the team definitely would have made the playoffs and been VERY dangerous after returning to the up-tempo style under Gentry.

I don't think Gentry is a great coach, but he's a better fit for this team than Porter was because he is a player's coach and he let the team play up-tempo.

Porter was just the wrong fit for this team.

He may become a head-coach again and do a good job, but his system was absolutely terrible for this team and that's more on Kerr than it is on Porter because Kerr hired Porter thinking his system would be a good fit. It turned out to be a disaster.

Porter would be a good coach for a younger team with players who fit his system, but hiring such an inexperienced coach to coach a veteran team like the Suns was a dumb move by Kerr.

As much as I criticized Porter, I blame Kerr more than I blame Porter.

It was a bad fit from the beginning.

Re: and after all was sad and done, 1 game was the difference

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:12 pm
by Frank Lee
BurningHeart wrote:If we had Amare, we'd be a contending team with Gentry running the show.


Keep on believing in the past. The ''If we had Amare' tag line has been used before.

I guess, with your logic, we will be a contending team this year if all parts remain the same.

Re: and after all was sad and done, 1 game was the difference

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:16 pm
by lilfishi22
The Diesel wrote:As much as I criticized Porter, I blame Kerr more than I blame Porter.

It was a bad fit from the beginning.


I blame Kerr for not having fired Porter earlier.

Re: and after all was sad and done, 1 game was the difference

Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:41 pm
by DaDragicShow
If Kerr fired Porter after 40 games we could of made the playoffs. The 11 game difference would of been huge.

Re: and after all was sad and done, 1 game was the difference

Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:05 am
by BurningHeart
I don't get what's hard about believing that if we have the system that causes us to play the way we should play, that losing our second best player ISN'T a detrimental blow, but whatever.