Page 1 of 2

Mike Conley

Posted: Wed May 20, 2009 4:33 am
by Nash2Stoudemire
Rubio is most likely going to Memphis, making MCJ expendable.

Would you guys be interested in him and what could we give up?

Re: Mike Conley

Posted: Wed May 20, 2009 4:52 am
by CraigDeuce
NOOOOOOOOOOOOO


Conley has shown nothing to prove he's going to be anywhere close to a top-level PG in this league.

Re: Mike Conley

Posted: Wed May 20, 2009 6:33 am
by Kerrsed
The Clippers will trade Griffin to Memphis to get their PG of the future <--what they need
That will leave Memphis with a line-up of
Conley/Mayo/Gay/Griffin/Gasol <---- Pretty scary IMHO!

THIS WILL HAPPEN!

Re: Mike Conley

Posted: Wed May 20, 2009 9:06 am
by boshjonesford
Kerrsed wrote:The Clippers will trade Griffin to Memphis to get their PG of the future <--what they need
That will leave Memphis with a line-up of
Conley/Mayo/Gay/Griffin/Gasol <---- Pretty scary IMHO!

THIS WILL HAPPEN!


THIS WONT HAPPEN

Image

Image

Re: Mike Conley

Posted: Wed May 20, 2009 7:10 pm
by RaisingArizona
Personally I'd love to have Mike Conley over Dragic; I'd rather have a lot of point guards over him.

Re: Mike Conley

Posted: Wed May 20, 2009 7:15 pm
by TASTIC
CraigDeuce wrote:NOOOOOOOOOOOOO


Conley has shown nothing to prove he's going to be anywhere close to a top-level PG in this league.


Yeah that's complete bull. The dude increased production massively over the second half
Post All Star 30 games 36mins 14.5pts 3.7reb 5.6asst 1.7stl 46%fg 43.5% 3pt 84%ft

So yeah. he's shown he can run a team, albeit one with shoddy pieces around him

Kerrsed wrote:The Clippers will trade Griffin to Memphis to get their PG of the future <--what they need
That will leave Memphis with a line-up of
Conley/Mayo/Gay/Griffin/Gasol <---- Pretty scary IMHO!

THIS WILL HAPPEN!

Ha. yeah not happening

Re: Mike Conley

Posted: Wed May 20, 2009 7:31 pm
by rsavaj
I'm down with Conley. I'd even trade the 14th pick for him.

Re: Mike Conley

Posted: Wed May 20, 2009 8:44 pm
by TASTIC
^I wouldn't think twice about moving the #14 for him...I'd throw in Tucker and ask for Ross back too :D

Re: Mike Conley

Posted: Wed May 20, 2009 10:16 pm
by harshey1388
TASTIC wrote:^I wouldn't think twice about moving the #14 for him...I'd throw in Tucker and ask for Ross back too :D


i like it. ross and conley would be great additions, but i see them as more offensive threats rather than the defensive route we are "saying" we're doing. not like alando is a great defensive player either haha

Re: Mike Conley

Posted: Wed May 20, 2009 11:15 pm
by TASTIC
Ross!!?? he's an elite perimeter defender...definitely defensive minded over offense...

Re: Mike Conley

Posted: Wed May 20, 2009 11:41 pm
by harshey1388
okie haha my bad then i thought he was a spark off the bench offensively ha

Re: Mike Conley

Posted: Thu May 21, 2009 12:34 am
by ruiner
I'd rather use the #14 pick on Flynn, or Jennings, Teague, or Maynor than any kind of trade for Conley.

Re: Mike Conley

Posted: Thu May 21, 2009 12:39 am
by TASTIC
^You'd SERIOUSLY pass on Conley - in his 3rd year - over ANY of those guys?

If Conley were drafted now, he'd be on par with Rubio, no doubt.

Re: Mike Conley

Posted: Thu May 21, 2009 1:00 am
by ruiner
I just don't think much of Conley. There's not much progression there, andd a solid or good 2nd half season in his 3rd yr isn't showing me much regardless of who is around him. I'd take my chances on those guys (especially Flynn/Jennings) if we do go PG. I didn't even like him when he was coming out, I'd certaintly take Rubio over him. If they do deal Conley to draft another, that might just show what they actually think about him.

Re: Mike Conley

Posted: Thu May 21, 2009 1:09 am
by TASTIC
^That's true...I think they draft Rubio and keep them together as learns under Conley

I really like Jennings from what I've seen...would love him here

Re: Mike Conley

Posted: Thu May 21, 2009 3:51 am
by nanoclarkology
IMO I think Rubio would end up starting over Conley. But we will see what happens.

Re: Mike Conley

Posted: Thu May 21, 2009 7:51 pm
by JohnVancouver
TASTIC wrote:^You'd SERIOUSLY pass on Conley - in his 3rd year - over ANY of those guys?

If Conley were drafted now, he'd be on par with Rubio, no doubt.


--- Really? I respect your opinion, and haven't watched Conley much at all but I'd got the impression he was just okay, but no-one special. I do recall that mid-season the coach kind of decided to give him the team to run and see if he was the guy they wanted. I take it he did well.
Tell you what - Houston has sure drafted nicely they last few years. Scola, Landry, Brooks. Them and Utah always have a strong team, and add quality young guys. Why can't we ... he asked rhetorically.

Re: Mike Conley

Posted: Thu May 21, 2009 7:53 pm
by rsavaj
I'd take Rubio as a 16 year old over Conley right now :-D

Re: Mike Conley

Posted: Thu May 21, 2009 8:02 pm
by TASTIC
^haha

You sir are a ghey pervert :D

Conley's underrated...I've probably overrated him a bit...I just think for the number of FAIL lottery picks we've seen, you could do a lot worse than Mike Conley for the 14th pick...

Re: Mike Conley

Posted: Fri May 22, 2009 12:56 am
by RaisingArizona
TASTIC wrote:^haha

You sir are a ghey pervert :D

Conley's underrated...I've probably overrated him a bit...I just think for the number of FAIL lottery picks we've seen, you could do a lot worse than Mike Conley for the 14th pick...


Conley resembles a young kj. He was also a top 5 pick in a better draft class than this year is; he's only in his 3rd season. I don't see how people are not even giving him a chance.