
So Um.m..
Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22
Re: So Um.m..
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,222
- And1: 132
- Joined: Feb 09, 2009
-
Re: So Um.m..
what about em ???
Re: So Um.m..
- azballer53
- Junior
- Posts: 480
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 09, 2009
Re: So Um.m..
they suck and if they dont get ramon there future doesnt look bright

Kerrsed wrote:Over/under: By mid season all Lopez interviews will come with subtitles?
Re: So Um.m..
- Stix
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,337
- And1: 2,655
- Joined: Jul 26, 2007
- Location: Phoenix
-
Re: So Um.m..
FAIL. look at his sig...
IBTL
IBTL
Re: So Um.m..
- MaryvalesFinest
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,326
- And1: 3
- Joined: Jul 23, 2008
- Location: Back
Re: So Um.m..
Well...
They should have drafted Brandon Jennings, he would have exploded in D'antoni's system. I liked the Toney Douglas pick for them but Jennings would have been a perfect fit for the Knicks. As for FA I don't get what their trying to do but they should look to re-sign Nate Robinson and do a sign and trade with David Lee.
They should have drafted Brandon Jennings, he would have exploded in D'antoni's system. I liked the Toney Douglas pick for them but Jennings would have been a perfect fit for the Knicks. As for FA I don't get what their trying to do but they should look to re-sign Nate Robinson and do a sign and trade with David Lee.
Re: So Um.m..
- TheMan44
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,431
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 09, 2009
Re: So Um.m..
The knicks?
well, the knicks have proven that D'Antoni is not a basketball God genius afterall and that it was Steve Nash who made the engine run in Phoenix. Without Nash, D'Antoni is toast and the Knicks stink.
(u can argue the other way around too - saying Suns were better w/ D'Antoni. So i guess both sides - Nash and D'Antoni - ONLY work well together and fail when apart)
well, the knicks have proven that D'Antoni is not a basketball God genius afterall and that it was Steve Nash who made the engine run in Phoenix. Without Nash, D'Antoni is toast and the Knicks stink.
(u can argue the other way around too - saying Suns were better w/ D'Antoni. So i guess both sides - Nash and D'Antoni - ONLY work well together and fail when apart)
"Lead, follow, or get out of the way." -Thomas Paine
Re: So Um.m..
- JohnVancouver
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,016
- And1: 236
- Joined: Jun 18, 2007
- Location: Vancouver, BC
Re: So Um.m..
Sunsman44 wrote:The knicks?
well, the knicks have proven that D'Antoni is not a basketball God genius afterall and that it was Steve Nash who made the engine run in Phoenix. Without Nash, D'Antoni is toast and the Knicks stink.
(u can argue the other way around too - saying Suns were better w/ D'Antoni. So i guess both sides - Nash and D'Antoni - ONLY work well together and fail when apart)
Oh, I think Mike D did all rright - +9 wins form last season, with a linup that was constantly changing and two of its highest paid stars, and I use the term advisedly, on the bench or in the stands for the entire season. (Curry and Steph)
Walsh is assembling a solid young crew and while sessions would be nice, he doesn't have Nash's shot, which is a huge part of what makes his game work. If you know the guy has to pass because he can't hit the shot ... is a problem Nash has never had.
I agree maybe Douglas was not the guy some would have chosen but he looks good so far
If they can keep Lee somehow, with Chandler at the 2/3, Gallinari healthy, Toney Douglas and Jordan Hill (who looks okay if not great) - that's just a universe away from the hodgepodge of headcases and morbidly obese retards Isiah had cobbled together.
I think they make the playoffs next year, and Walsh is nowhere near done. A guy they ought to add, in my opinion, is Coby Karl - cheap, plays D, has a good all-round game, no ego, ready to work.
"Deng and Mozgov was some 1980s Clippers sh*t. So, so dumb" - Sedale Threatt
"If you can't get banned for threatening to rape a mod, what can you get banned for?" Jigga_Man/2013
"Everybody love Everybody." - Jackie Moon
"If you can't get banned for threatening to rape a mod, what can you get banned for?" Jigga_Man/2013
"Everybody love Everybody." - Jackie Moon
Re: So Um.m..
- TASTIC
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 18,410
- And1: 2,425
- Joined: May 17, 2004
- Location: New Zealand
-
Re: So Um.m..
Seriously this offseason the thread creating has been a joke
If you're going to start a thread, make a point. or it's going to have a short shelf life - and don't just post and not bother to make a legit conversation, it's annoying and frustrates everyone
If you're going to start a thread, make a point. or it's going to have a short shelf life - and don't just post and not bother to make a legit conversation, it's annoying and frustrates everyone
Re: So Um.m..
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,222
- And1: 132
- Joined: Feb 09, 2009
-
Re: So Um.m..
TASTIC wrote:Seriously this offseason the thread creating has been a joke
If you're going to start a thread, make a point. or it's going to have a short shelf life - and don't just post and not bother to make a legit conversation, it's annoying and frustrates everyone
Hey TASTIC, I think this was just somebodies (Please Use More Appropriate Word) joke because of all the post about not creating the useless threads. It is getting really irritating..........
Re: So Um.m..
- Kerrsed
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 29,876
- And1: 16,578
- Joined: Mar 31, 2009
- Location: Land of the Internet Memes
- Contact:
-
Re: So Um.m..
TASTIC wrote:Seriously this offseason the thread creating has been a joke
If you're going to start a thread, make a point. or it's going to have a short shelf life - and don't just post and not bother to make a legit conversation, it's annoying and frustrates everyone

Its #DUMPSTERFIRE SEASON! #TeamTRAINWRECK -KERRSED- The Mod, The Myth, The Legend


Re: So Um.m..
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 199
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 12, 2008
- Location: UNKNOWN
Re: So Um.m..
HEY i just want to see the thoughts on the knicks, ok pancho
"to be the man, you got to beat the man" -RICK FOX (3 Time NBA Champion)
Re: So Um.m..
- TASTIC
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 18,410
- And1: 2,425
- Joined: May 17, 2004
- Location: New Zealand
-
Re: So Um.m..
why not post YOUR thoughts on it as well then?
we literally have zero interest in the Knicks...D'Antoni left on bad terms and with Marbury and Q gone there aren't any connections there
Imagine if I went on the Knicks board and posted:
"So Um.m..."
so uhh...... How 'bout those Suns??
we literally have zero interest in the Knicks...D'Antoni left on bad terms and with Marbury and Q gone there aren't any connections there
Imagine if I went on the Knicks board and posted:
"So Um.m..."
so uhh...... How 'bout those Suns??
Re: So Um.m..
-
- Suns Forum College Scout
- Posts: 17,165
- And1: 6,895
- Joined: Jun 25, 2009
- Location: the Arizona desert
Re: So Um.m..
Think D'Antoni is second guessing choosing NY over Chicago? I would, just after he declined the Bulls job they won the lottery and got D Rose... Ouch
fromthetop321 wrote:I got Lebron number 1, he is also leading defensive player of the year. Curry's game still reminds me of Jeremy Lin to much.
Re: So Um.m..
- lilfishi22
- Forum Mod - Suns
- Posts: 36,179
- And1: 24,530
- Joined: Oct 16, 2007
- Location: Australia
Re: So Um.m..
lol I can imagine Tastic's frustration. Bet you wanna just ban these dudes but you gotta give some warning first etc etc
Re: So Um.m..
- Orange_Blooded
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,874
- And1: 1
- Joined: Oct 23, 2006
- Location: San Diego
Re: So Um.m..
This whole post is a joke, should have at least had a valid title. "So Um.m.." Sounds like something someone would drunkenly write to a girl on myspace.
I'd love to discuss NY or any other team but not on a waste of a thread like this.
I'd love to discuss NY or any other team but not on a waste of a thread like this.

Re: So Um.m..
- TXSun
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,953
- And1: 0
- Joined: Aug 03, 2008
Re: So Um.m..
yet this thread has managed to get 14 replies, wait make it 15 with mine.
"This is some bull $hit"
Re: So Um.m..
- Miklo
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 7,674
- And1: 278
- Joined: Jan 23, 2005
- Location: North Carolina
-
Re: So Um.m..
TXSun wrote:yet this thread has managed to get 14 replies, wait make it 15 with mine.
that's what trolls do!
Re: So Um.m..
- Risensun
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 752
- And1: 26
- Joined: Jun 26, 2009
- Location: The Grave...
Re: So Um.m..
The knicks? Last I checked this was a Phoenix Suns basketball board.
I'm struggling to figure out how they would be relevant on this or any board while we're at it. How bout those knicks? Last I checked they sucked so if you're looking for reassurance on that great.
Don't get too excited about Sessions either. He can't shoot a lick. Teams will just back off him and defend the pass. On a normal team they could adjust but with Dantoni's offense it will spell disaster.
So welcome, and goodbye. I can't see anything making them relevant for the next few years, or warranting another A$$clown thread like this forever.
I'm struggling to figure out how they would be relevant on this or any board while we're at it. How bout those knicks? Last I checked they sucked so if you're looking for reassurance on that great.
Don't get too excited about Sessions either. He can't shoot a lick. Teams will just back off him and defend the pass. On a normal team they could adjust but with Dantoni's offense it will spell disaster.
So welcome, and goodbye. I can't see anything making them relevant for the next few years, or warranting another A$$clown thread like this forever.