ImageImageImage

NBA.com Article About the Suns Off-Season (Kerr Comments)

Moderators: bwgood77, Qwigglez, lilfishi22

The Diesel
Veteran
Posts: 2,711
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 07, 2005

NBA.com Article About the Suns Off-Season (Kerr Comments) 

Post#1 » by The Diesel » Thu Aug 27, 2009 2:00 am

Hey guys,

I found this article on NBA.com today about the Suns off-season so far which includes comments from Kerr.

Enjoy!

Steve Kerr hears the talk, reads the projections and, quite frankly, understands why much of the basketball world thinks the Phoenix Suns have taken a huge step backward out of the Playoff picture.

In short, they traded Shaquille O'Neal for a handful of beans.

"I think that move was looked at as a white flag of surrender," said Kerr, the Suns' president and general manager. "We didn't get anything back in that trade in terms of bodies, of players that we intended to keep. But the truth is that move gave us the financial flexibility to move forward and improve in a subtle way."

What was not so subtle was Amar'e Stoudemire's absence from the lineup last season as the result of a detached retina. Even without Stoudemire on the floor for 29 games, the Suns still won 46 games and finished just two out of the final playoff spot in the Western Conference.

Yet even if Stoudemire had been able to play, the Suns didn't see themselves as a true championship caliber club.

"We thought we had the potential to be good, maybe very good," said Kerr. "But we thought we were in the next group below the Lakers, with teams like Houston and Denver and Dallas. Barring Amar'e's injury, maybe we could win a round or two in the Playoffs.

"But if you're not a championship team -- and that, obviously, is what prompted the deal to get Shaq -- then it made no sense to have a $20 million player clogging the payroll when you know that you're not going to get over the hump."

While many expected the Suns to blow up their roster and start over in a full rebuilding mode, Kerr's goal was to infuse the roster with youth while keeping old hands Steve Nash and Grant Hill around to provide guidance and stability.

The transition actually began in the middle of last season when Alvin Gentry replaced Terry Porter as coach and got the Suns back to playing their more open-court style of offense.

"Alvin has a great feel for our players, their abilities and their styles and they all love playing for him," Kerr said.

After dealing O'Neal and promptly buying out the contract of Ben Wallace (they also plan to let Sasha Pavlovic go), the Suns then had the money to sign forward Channing Frye to a $3.8 million free-agent contract and also got the 36-year-old Hill to return to the fold. Then 35-year-old former two-time MVP Nash was locked up with a two-year, $22 million contract extension.

"I guess, in the eyes of some, it seemed a little funny to be so committed to going forward with an older Steve Nash," Kerr said. "And when Steve and I talked about the future, maybe at first he had those kinds of questions, too. But I'm not looking at just having Steve Nash around to play out the string on his career. I think that with what he can do and what Grant Hill can do, these veterans can lift up a young team and do some big things."


http://www.nba.com/2009/news/features/fran_blinebury/08/25/suns/index.html

Click the link to read the rest of the article.

Your thoughts on the article?

It's interesting that Kerr continues to insist that the pre-Shaq trade team was not going to win the whole thing even though they were in 1st place in the West before the trade.
User avatar
lilfishi22
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 36,179
And1: 24,530
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Location: Australia

Re: NBA.com Article About the Suns Off-Season (Kerr Comments) 

Post#2 » by lilfishi22 » Thu Aug 27, 2009 2:12 am

The pre-Shaq Suns had a great record, but if you look at the w/l against the playoff teams, we didn't have a winning record. It was clear that the better teams in the league started to learn how to stop our offense. The Spurs knew how to do it years ago, and teams like the Lakers and Boston caught on. We were seen as a playoff team but as long as the Spurs were there to stop us, we were nothing more than a good playoff team.

The Shaq trade was a huge gamble to take us over those teams. I didn't like the trade in the beginning since I'm a huge fan of the Matrix, but KT gone we really didn't have a low post defender that could slow down the Duncan's, KG's and Gasol's. We brought in Shaq to give us just enough defense, rebounds and some scoring to cancel out the effects of those big men.

As for the direction we're taking, I think it's probably the only path we can take. We are no longer a contender and with guys like JRich still under contract till 2011, it's best to get as much financial flexibility as possible. I'm not so sure about giving Nash that kind of extension, but it was probably necessary in order to keep him in Phoenix and we all know our greatest weapon is the Nash/Amare PnR. Without Nash we are easily a bottom 5 team.
User avatar
MaryvalesFinest
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,326
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 23, 2008
Location: Back

Re: NBA.com Article About the Suns Off-Season (Kerr Comments) 

Post#3 » by MaryvalesFinest » Thu Aug 27, 2009 2:45 am

It's unfortunate since Shaq's still a good player but with guys like Nash, J-Rich, Amare, etc we all know Shaq was the odd man out since he played the opposite style as those guys. It was fun having him on the Suns but they also lost the whole lane, couldn't do the Amare pick and roll, J-Rich couldn't drive to the basket which is a big part of his game, etc. So the trade definately helps the Suns and who knows how Shaq would have acted this year in reguards to chemistry with the Suns missing the playoffs and all.
User avatar
nashrambler13
Suns Forum Returning Poster of the Year
Posts: 1,347
And1: 180
Joined: Aug 22, 2009
       

Re: NBA.com Article About the Suns Off-Season (Kerr Comments) 

Post#4 » by nashrambler13 » Thu Aug 27, 2009 3:09 am

shaq just didnt fit with our team. it made nash about average, as he demanded the ball if he wanted to score.

if only we had kept shawn marion, and then shipped barbosa and diaw for a defensive center...

w/ Nash, raja, marion, amare and tyson chandler we would have won the championship. plain and simple.
User avatar
Qwigglez
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 21,552
And1: 14,845
Joined: Jul 10, 2009
Contact:
     

Re: NBA.com Article About the Suns Off-Season (Kerr Comments) 

Post#5 » by Qwigglez » Thu Aug 27, 2009 7:22 pm

nashrambler13 wrote:shaq just didnt fit with our team. it made nash about average, as he demanded the ball if he wanted to score.

if only we had kept shawn marion, and then shipped barbosa and diaw for a defensive center...

w/ Nash, raja, marion, amare and tyson chandler we would have won the championship. plain and simple.

Then we'd have no bench lol.

Return to Phoenix Suns