Page 1 of 3

pick 1

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:35 am
by KLEON
Bulls get: Jason Richardson and Channing Frye

Suns get: Tyrus Thomas and Brad Miller



Clippers get: Jason Richardson

Suns get: Mardy Collins and Marcus Camby


Wizards get: Jason Richardson
Suns get: Caron Butler and JaVale McGee

Hornets get: Jason Richardson
Suns get: David West and Mo Peterson


Suns get: Chris Bosh
Raptors get: Jason Richardson, Channing Frye and Earl Clark

Re: pick 1

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:38 am
by Kerrsed
All of them would require massive amounts of lube, but out of all i would go with the Wiz. :D

Re: pick 1

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:40 am
by Blackification
I like camby on this team..

Re: pick 1

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:44 am
by Nando88
you forgot to add

Jrich + Frye for Lebron James

Re: pick 1

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:50 am
by Flying Colors
you mean j rich, frye for lebron+filler and a draft pick

Re: pick 1

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:51 am
by Blackification
jrich + frye for randolph, Bell, Claxton

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachi ... Id=yl68dsy

nelson would love those chuckers and i just threw in claxton as a filler. Randolph would be a beast in this system and even if bell is just an image of his former self he would at least give this team some balls cuz we sure as hell don't have any.

Re: pick 1

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:53 am
by TASTIC
None of those have ANY likelihood of happening

Only way we get someone to take JRich is if we add Barbosa and/or Clark, or pair him with Amare

Re: pick 1

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:03 am
by Gorilla Warfare
Although you are clearly high on PCP, i'll take the Wizards trade.

Re: pick 1

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:05 am
by hunterxaz
Bosh

Re: pick 1

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:10 am
by sunfire0112
TASTIC wrote:None of those have ANY likelihood of happening


+1

JRich has negative trade value. He's not even worth expirings.

Blackification wrote:jrich + frye for randolph, Bell, Claxton

GS jettisoned him after they gave him that ridiculous contract. No way they want him back. Only way I see a trade w/ GS is something like Amare for AR [(Bell/Speedy/1st) or (Beans/Azu)]. Even that seems unlikely. :(

Re: pick 1

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:12 am
by Gorilla Warfare
I really think the only "star" we could get in return for Richardson is McGrady because the Rockets would pretty much do anything to get rid of him, even if it involves taking on Richardsons atrocious contract.

Re: pick 1

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:15 am
by JohnVancouver
How do we arrange to give the respective GMs the requisite brain damage required to say yes to any of this?


I can hear the steam coming out of Frank's ears .......

Re: pick 1

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:19 am
by Kerrsed
Get Nashty wrote:I really think the only "star" we could get in return for Richardson is McGrady because the Rockets would pretty much do anything to get rid of him, even if it involves taking on Richardsons atrocious contract.


Thats what i just said in another thread. Amare/Jrich for McGrady/Cook/Budinger/Pick(?). The Rockets already let it be known that they are willing to take back 1 bad contract in exchange for McGrady (Knicks were pushing them for 2). How could the Rockets not want a starting 5 of Brooks/Richardson/Ariza/Amare/Yao next year??????

Re: pick 1

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:20 am
by Gorilla Warfare
Kerrsed wrote:
Get Nashty wrote:I really think the only "star" we could get in return for Richardson is McGrady because the Rockets would pretty much do anything to get rid of him, even if it involves taking on Richardsons atrocious contract.


Thats what i just said in another thread. Amare/Jrich for McGrady/Cook/Budinger/Pick(?). The Rockets already let it be known that they are willing to take back 1 bad contract in exchange for McGrady (Knicks were pushing them for 2). How could the Rockets not want a starting 5 of Brooks/Richardson/Ariza/Amare/Yao next year??????


Because Richardson would be their starting SG....

Re: pick 1

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:22 am
by Kerrsed
Get Nashty wrote:
Kerrsed wrote:
Get Nashty wrote:I really think the only "star" we could get in return for Richardson is McGrady because the Rockets would pretty much do anything to get rid of him, even if it involves taking on Richardsons atrocious contract.


Thats what i just said in another thread. Amare/Jrich for McGrady/Cook/Budinger/Pick(?). The Rockets already let it be known that they are willing to take back 1 bad contract in exchange for McGrady (Knicks were pushing them for 2). How could the Rockets not want a starting 5 of Brooks/Richardson/Ariza/Amare/Yao next year??????


Because Richardson would be their starting SG....



Richardson> Battier. Am i right? Battier/Scola/Lowery/Landry/Hayes for a bench!

Re: pick 1

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:26 am
by sunfire0112
Has JRich's value dropped so low that he devalues Amare as worth Budinger/#15-18pick? :(

Re: pick 1

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:30 am
by Kerrsed
sunfire0112 wrote:Has JRich's value dropped so low that he devalues Amare as worth Budinger/#15-18pick? :(


Yes. If we wanted to get rid of him, the only way would be to attach him to Amare. It would give us a ton of cap relief, a draft pick..................and Kerr's godson. Suns FO would take it in a heartbeat.

Budinger/draft pick/Richardson gone/cap space (McGrady) >>>> Amare walking.

Re: pick 1

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:33 am
by DirtyDez
Our weakest position is SG. Without hitting the jackpot for a J-Rich trade our only option is draft or Free Agency. If we can flip J-Rich for an expiring contract and Amare walks we could get David Lee and Joe Johnson. With RoLo and Duds that's a complete starting 5 next year. But will JJ come back to the desert?

Re: pick 1

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:38 am
by Flying Colors
JJ would come back for the right price, which i don't sarver is willing to pay

Re: pick 1

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:39 am
by Kerrsed
BizzyPHX wrote:for the right price, which i don't sarver is willing to pay


He wasnt willing to pay it the first time, and sure as hell wont pay it (now that it is more $$$$) the second time.