Is Channing sexually assualting Lopez's minutes?

SUN · Post #1 » by **SUN** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:53 am

He only got 17+ this game, and Frye was terrible. I mean awful, he got a foul which could've cost us the game.

Do you agree?

Jimmy76 · Post #2 » by **Jimmy76** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:54 am

SUN wrote:He only got 17+ this game, and Frye was terrible. I mean awful, he got a foul which could've cost us the game.

Do you agree?

lopez was worse

Post #3 » by **Qwigglez** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:55 am

Doesn't deserve its own thread.
I think the coach didn't give Lopez more minutes because his lack of offense.

MaryvalesFinest · Post #4 » by **MaryvalesFinest** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:55 am

I'm kind of worried after watching Lopez play tonight, was it Nash all this time that was making him look good with the pick and rolls and alley oops or did he just have a bad game?

SUN · Post #5 » by **SUN** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:55 am

Jimmy76 wrote:
SUN wrote:He only got 17+ this game, and Frye was terrible. I mean awful, he got a foul which could've cost us the game.

Do you agree?

lopez was worse

Not true - he was grabbing rebounds pretty well - and he can be a scorer in the paint. Channing didn't do crap.

Jimmy76 · Post #6 » by **Jimmy76** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:56 am

MaryvalesFinest wrote:I'm kind of worried after watching Lopez play tonight, was it Nash all this time that was making him look good with the pick and rolls and alley oops or did he just have a bad game?

think we need to see a lot more games to judge

ive worried that as well

but nash definitely isnt responsible for how good a garbage man he usually is

Jimmy76 · Post #7 » by **Jimmy76** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:57 am

SUN wrote:
Jimmy76 wrote:
SUN wrote:He only got 17+ this game, and Frye was terrible. I mean awful, he got a foul which could've cost us the game.

Do you agree?

lopez was worse

Not true - he was grabbing rebounds pretty well - and he can be a scorer in the paint. Channing didn't do crap.

he went 0-3 and got 2 boards in 18 minutes

Nando88 · Post #8 » by **Nando88** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:05 am

sexually assaulting?

SUN · Post #9 » by **SUN** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:07 am

Nando88 wrote:sexually assaulting?

Sarcastically, of course.

Post #10 » by **Qwigglez** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:09 am

MaryvalesFinest wrote:I'm kind of worried after watching Lopez play tonight, was it Nash all this time that was making him look good with the pick and rolls and alley oops or did he just have a bad game?

Lopez made that sweet spin move, however missed the easy shot because of his balance or something. I think he wasn't ready to step it up as a leader when Nash went down.
But yeah, I was expecting Lopez to score at least ten. Or grab more than 2 rebounds.

Jimmy76 · Post #11 » by **Jimmy76** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:12 am

Qwigglez wrote:
MaryvalesFinest wrote:I'm kind of worried after watching Lopez play tonight, was it Nash all this time that was making him look good with the pick and rolls and alley oops or did he just have a bad game?

Lopez made that sweet spin move, however missed the easy shot because of his balance or something. I think he wasn't ready to step it up as a leader when Nash went down.
But yeah, I was expecting Lopez to score at least ten. Or grab more than 2 rebounds.

is Mary acknowledging something positive about nash

JMac1 · Post #12 » by **JMac1** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:12 am

Slow down. let the man find his way without Nash. It is tougher for a big man to find his game when he isn't getting post-up touches. Lopez will always get his points off of othe players.

SUN · Post #13 » by **SUN** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:14 am

JMac1 wrote:Slow down. let the man find his way without Nash. It is tougher for a big man to find his game when he isn't getting post-up touches. Lopez will always get his points off of othe players.

I agree.

ma_falaa_50 · Post #14 » by **ma_falaa_50** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:29 am

we drafted lopez to compliment amare. I think he does a better job at that than channing. If ppl are critical or worried about lopez, they should be more worried about channing.

Post #15 » by **Qwigglez** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:32 am

Yeah Lopez compliments Amare well. But at the same time, Frye spaces the floor well with Amare, but instead of just opening up the floor for Amare, Frye actually takes shots away from Amare. SMH.

ma_falaa_50 · Post #16 » by **ma_falaa_50** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:47 am

im looking at both ends of the floor. Amare does not need more help on offense he needs help on the boards and defense. channing does not do him any favors on that end.

TXSun · Post #17 » by **TXSun** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:50 am

sexually? c'mon bro.

UofAsuns · Post #18 » by **UofAsuns** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:59 am

Amare doesn't need anybody to complement his play in my opinion. ROLO helps him bang down low and channing spaces the floor but Amare is good enough to determine his own fate. I think we have seen how he's been playing like a monster since all the trade chatter escalated and died. I am hoping at this point he is looking to prove that he can be a great player on his own. Stoudemire needs to decide how he wants to make players like frye and lopez better.

ma_falaa_50 · Post #19 » by **ma_falaa_50** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:28 am

stats not a lead. he is what he is. I think Lopez right now deserves more minutes than frye. teams have taken away his 3 point shot. he is soft too. we dont need anymore of those.

garrick · Post #20 » by **garrick** » Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:41 am

First off Channing doesn't decide who plays and who doesn't, that's the coaches job. I'm not sure how sexual assault ties into minutes played.
I'm not sure if you watched the game Sun but Frye was the lesser of two evils tonight, he sucked but not as much as Rolo did.