UFC 183 (1/31): Nick Diaz vs. Anderson Silva

Moderator: lilfishi22

Headliner
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 36,740
And1: 1,976
Joined: Oct 31, 2001
 

Re: UFC 183 (1/31): Nick Diaz vs. Anderson Silva 

Post#221 » by Headliner » Mon Feb 2, 2015 12:50 am

I dont train so maybe I have no clue, but Belfort has been fighting for like 20 years. Shouldn't he be prepared to fight a wrestler or a striker?
I know every fighter has their own style, but to say I only trained for a wrestler, seems silly.
Mehar
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,311
And1: 2,863
Joined: Apr 23, 2012
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: UFC 183 (1/31): Nick Diaz vs. Anderson Silva 

Post#222 » by Mehar » Mon Feb 2, 2015 1:29 am

Headliner wrote:I dont train so maybe I have no clue, but Belfort has been fighting for like 20 years. Shouldn't he be prepared to fight a wrestler or a striker?
I know every fighter has their own style, but to say I only trained for a wrestler, seems silly.


I absolutely agree. I do not like the games Vitor is playing. You have almost a month of preparation for your opponent. I think since he knows he is guaranteed a title shot- he is probably wanting not to face a dangerous guy like Machida, and lose his shot at the title.

This is the tweet i read today from Greg Savage from Sherdog as it pertained to Vitor wanting Munoz (a guy coming off two losses).

https://twitter.com/TheSavageTruth/stat ... 8830059520
User avatar
REDDzone
RealGM
Posts: 30,209
And1: 5,132
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
 

Re: UFC 183 (1/31): Nick Diaz vs. Anderson Silva 

Post#223 » by REDDzone » Mon Feb 2, 2015 1:41 am

Headliner wrote:I dont train so maybe I have no clue, but Belfort has been fighting for like 20 years. Shouldn't he be prepared to fight a wrestler or a striker?
I know every fighter has their own style, but to say I only trained for a wrestler, seems silly.


The irritating part is that they had the news a month out. Its not like he's changing the day of the fight. It is what it is I guess. But as mehar mentioned, this is the second time he has turned down the Machida fight so that's not coincidence.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
User avatar
cowboyronnie
RealGM
Posts: 30,236
And1: 1,490
Joined: Feb 20, 2004

Re: UFC 183 (1/31): Nick Diaz vs. Anderson Silva 

Post#224 » by cowboyronnie » Mon Feb 2, 2015 2:14 am

Vitor, not so courageous these days...
Hi love, bye love, I will miss my love.
User avatar
REDDzone
RealGM
Posts: 30,209
And1: 5,132
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
 

Re: UFC 183 (1/31): Nick Diaz vs. Anderson Silva 

Post#225 » by REDDzone » Mon Feb 2, 2015 2:16 am

cowboyronnie wrote:Vitor, not so courageous these days...


Well especially if he refuses to fight Rockhold, right? It was only 1.5 years ago that he kicked his head off his shoulers. Unless something has changed? :D
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
User avatar
cowboyronnie
RealGM
Posts: 30,236
And1: 1,490
Joined: Feb 20, 2004

Re: UFC 183 (1/31): Nick Diaz vs. Anderson Silva 

Post#226 » by cowboyronnie » Mon Feb 2, 2015 2:25 am

Setting the cosmos for justice if Rockhold gets the comeback fight against TRTless Vitor.

Why would Vitor take a fight vs Rockhold, though, if he's playing hardball? A loss makes him look like suuuuuch an ****. You'd think he'd rather face Machida than try to reproduce results from his TRT days.
Hi love, bye love, I will miss my love.
User avatar
CPT
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,314
And1: 2,788
Joined: Jan 21, 2002
Location: Osaka/Seoul/Toronto
         

Re: UFC 183 (1/31): Nick Diaz vs. Anderson Silva 

Post#227 » by CPT » Mon Feb 2, 2015 3:58 am

I'm wondering why Machida was even the go-to guy for an interim title. I mean if he wins, then we have Weidman vs. Machida II? Already? There are like 3-4 guys I want to see fight Weidman before we start getting into rematches. He's got wins over Silva and Machida, which is obviously great, but he really hasn't fought anyone else who is currently relevant at MW. I want to see those fights.
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 27,855
And1: 8,371
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
     

Re: UFC 183 (1/31): Nick Diaz vs. Anderson Silva 

Post#228 » by Bernman » Mon Feb 2, 2015 4:04 am

Probably because Machida doesn't cut much weight and he beat Mousasi easily. Jacare is big and out. Rockhold is big. Romero might be big again and CBR alluded to him possibly being on roids. So that would leave us with the Dragon.
User avatar
lilfishi22
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 36,149
And1: 24,487
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Location: Australia

Re: UFC 183 (1/31): Nick Diaz vs. Anderson Silva 

Post#229 » by lilfishi22 » Mon Feb 2, 2015 4:12 am

Bernman wrote:Probably because Machida doesn't cut much weight and he beat Mousasi easily. Jacare is big and out. Rockhold is big. Romero might be big again and CBR alluded to him possibly being on roids. So that would leave us with the Dragon.

Also name value
User avatar
REDDzone
RealGM
Posts: 30,209
And1: 5,132
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
 

Re: UFC 183 (1/31): Nick Diaz vs. Anderson Silva 

Post#230 » by REDDzone » Mon Feb 2, 2015 4:19 am

CPT wrote:I'm wondering why Machida was even the go-to guy for an interim title. I mean if he wins, then we have Weidman vs. Machida II? Already? There are like 3-4 guys I want to see fight Weidman before we start getting into rematches. He's got wins over Silva and Machida, which is obviously great, but he really hasn't fought anyone else who is currently relevant at MW. I want to see those fights.


Bern makes a good point but also you have to wonder if the brass is worried about Weidman in general. How many fights has he pulled out of now? I think it was Rogan who was saying that even during the Machida fight, his leg was so messed up that he couldn't bring his heel to his butt. If they think Weidman is going to be out for awhile, or that they have some kind of Dom Cruz/ Cain Velasquez situation, I have to imagine they would want a guy who is proven to be able to draw and headline like Machida as interim champ as opposed to someone that few people know like Romero.

Plus, again, they raised the prices for this ppv and the card as it stands is one of the worst ppvs ever (if not THE worst). Sure the hardcores may want to see some of these newfound middleweight contenders in there vs Vitor but my guess is that zuffa is more comfortable putting a proven draw like Machida in there at co-main. I'm guess Machida/Belfort sells better than many of the alternatives.

IDK, just thinking out loud.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 27,855
And1: 8,371
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
     

Re: UFC 183 (1/31): Nick Diaz vs. Anderson Silva 

Post#231 » by Bernman » Mon Feb 2, 2015 4:38 am

That could be a bonus, but I don't know if they even had a choice in the matter. It would help if we knew Romero's situation. Someone should interview him to ask if he wants/wanted the fight. If so, then I'd buy RZ's angle as being the primary one.

Incidentally though, I haven't been able to bring my heel to my butt with either leg since I was 19. And at various points since I'd have been fine to fight, although nowhere my physical prime from chronic knee sublaxations. Just saying not being able to bring your heel to your butt ain't that crazy.
Jasen777
General Manager
Posts: 7,600
And1: 2,363
Joined: Feb 28, 2005

Re: UFC 183 (1/31): Nick Diaz vs. Anderson Silva 

Post#232 » by Jasen777 » Mon Feb 2, 2015 5:38 am

Belfort is saying he said he would fight anyone for the real title not an interim, upset about the fight being delayed 3 times.

http://www.mmafighting.com/2015/2/1/795 ... fight-with" target="_blank
User avatar
lilfishi22
Forum Mod - Suns
Forum Mod - Suns
Posts: 36,149
And1: 24,487
Joined: Oct 16, 2007
Location: Australia

Re: UFC 183 (1/31): Nick Diaz vs. Anderson Silva 

Post#233 » by lilfishi22 » Mon Feb 2, 2015 5:41 am

Vitor gonna Vitor
User avatar
REDDzone
RealGM
Posts: 30,209
And1: 5,132
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
 

Re: UFC 183 (1/31): Nick Diaz vs. Anderson Silva 

Post#234 » by REDDzone » Mon Feb 2, 2015 3:31 pm

Bernman wrote:Incidentally though, I haven't been able to bring my heel to my butt with either leg since I was 19. And at various points since I'd have been fine to fight, although nowhere my physical prime from chronic knee sublaxations. Just saying not being able to bring your heel to your butt ain't that crazy.


Well the heel to butt thing was obviously a symptom and not the issue. IDK enough about his injury to know the details but Rogan seemed to be pretty impressed that he was able to tough it out. Plus, beating Machida healthy is already an awesome accomplishment, much less if you are limited by some leg injury.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
NZB2323
RealGM
Posts: 14,121
And1: 10,742
Joined: Aug 02, 2008

Re: UFC 183 (1/31): Nick Diaz vs. Anderson Silva 

Post#235 » by NZB2323 » Mon Feb 2, 2015 3:56 pm

I tore my ACL and both MCLs on May 22nd and it took me forever to get my heel to touch my butt. I was so excited when I could do it, lol. And I agree with Redd, beating Machida with any kind of injury is super impressive. I wonder if that injury contributed towards Machida doing so well in the 4th round. That's the best anyone has ever looked against Weidman.
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 27,855
And1: 8,371
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
     

Re: UFC 183 (1/31): Nick Diaz vs. Anderson Silva 

Post#236 » by Bernman » Mon Feb 2, 2015 6:40 pm

REDDzone wrote:
Bernman wrote:Incidentally though, I haven't been able to bring my heel to my butt with either leg since I was 19. And at various points since I'd have been fine to fight, although nowhere my physical prime from chronic knee sublaxations. Just saying not being able to bring your heel to your butt ain't that crazy.


Well the heel to butt thing was obviously a symptom and not the issue. IDK enough about his injury to know the details but Rogan seemed to be pretty impressed that he was able to tough it out. Plus, beating Machida healthy is already an awesome accomplishment, much less if you are limited by some leg injury.


But accomplishing it with a supposed significant knee injury makes it all that much more impressive, and Rogan is paid to hype fights/fighters.
User avatar
REDDzone
RealGM
Posts: 30,209
And1: 5,132
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
 

Re: UFC 183 (1/31): Nick Diaz vs. Anderson Silva 

Post#237 » by REDDzone » Mon Feb 2, 2015 7:15 pm

Bernman wrote:
REDDzone wrote:
Bernman wrote:Incidentally though, I haven't been able to bring my heel to my butt with either leg since I was 19. And at various points since I'd have been fine to fight, although nowhere my physical prime from chronic knee sublaxations. Just saying not being able to bring your heel to your butt ain't that crazy.


Well the heel to butt thing was obviously a symptom and not the issue. IDK enough about his injury to know the details but Rogan seemed to be pretty impressed that he was able to tough it out. Plus, beating Machida healthy is already an awesome accomplishment, much less if you are limited by some leg injury.


But accomplishing it with a supposed significant knee injury makes it all that much more impressive, and Rogan is paid to hype fights/fighters.


Yea, he didn't say it on a ufc broadcast though. It was kind of as an aside in one of his podcasts.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 27,855
And1: 8,371
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
     

Re: UFC 183 (1/31): Nick Diaz vs. Anderson Silva 

Post#238 » by Bernman » Mon Feb 2, 2015 7:22 pm

REDDzone wrote:
Bernman wrote:
REDDzone wrote:
Well the heel to butt thing was obviously a symptom and not the issue. IDK enough about his injury to know the details but Rogan seemed to be pretty impressed that he was able to tough it out. Plus, beating Machida healthy is already an awesome accomplishment, much less if you are limited by some leg injury.


But accomplishing it with a supposed significant knee injury makes it all that much more impressive, and Rogan is paid to hype fights/fighters.


Yea, he didn't say it on a ufc broadcast though. It was kind of as an aside in one of his podcasts.


I think he mentioned The Chris' knee problems during the fight. I'm not sure about the heel to butt comment, but he started acting like he was diminished earlier than the podcast.
Jasen777
General Manager
Posts: 7,600
And1: 2,363
Joined: Feb 28, 2005

Re: UFC 183 (1/31): Nick Diaz vs. Anderson Silva 

Post#239 » by Jasen777 » Tue Feb 3, 2015 12:55 am

If the reported salaries here are right, then it looks like fighters missing weight don't lose a part of their win bonus. Which could make missing weight a profitable strategy if you believe it gives you an advantage.
User avatar
REDDzone
RealGM
Posts: 30,209
And1: 5,132
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
 

Re: UFC 183 (1/31): Nick Diaz vs. Anderson Silva 

Post#240 » by REDDzone » Tue Feb 3, 2015 1:34 am

Jasen777 wrote:If the reported salaries here are right, then it looks like fighters missing weight don't lose a part of their win bonus. Which could make missing weight a profitable strategy if you believe it gives you an advantage.


Yea people were referring to it as if they also get the win bonus but I don't think so. I think its just base pay, and yea Lineker has been doing that for years lol.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.

Return to Boxing & Mixed Martial Arts