UFC 132 (July 2, 2011)

Moderator: lilfishi22

User avatar
Banco
Junior
Posts: 251
And1: 36
Joined: Jul 08, 2006
         

Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011) 

Post#101 » by Banco » Sun Jul 3, 2011 1:37 am

Damn Bader is getting cut lol.
User avatar
Banco
Junior
Posts: 251
And1: 36
Joined: Jul 08, 2006
         

Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011) 

Post#102 » by Banco » Sun Jul 3, 2011 1:40 am

Chuck lookin salty that Tito won
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 27,901
And1: 8,404
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
     

Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011) 

Post#103 » by Bernman » Sun Jul 3, 2011 1:41 am

WTF happened? I thought that was a good time for a break considering the combatants.
User avatar
REDDzone
RealGM
Posts: 30,209
And1: 5,132
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
 

Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011) 

Post#104 » by REDDzone » Sun Jul 3, 2011 1:42 am

Tito still got it lol.

Bader meh.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
spykelee
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,469
And1: 3,334
Joined: Sep 14, 2005
Location: Toronto
   

Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011) 

Post#105 » by spykelee » Sun Jul 3, 2011 1:44 am

Bernman wrote:WTF happened? I thought that was a good time for a break considering the combatants.


Tito caught Bader with a punch and stunned him. He then jumped on him and sunk in a Guilitone and Bader tapped.
spykelee
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,469
And1: 3,334
Joined: Sep 14, 2005
Location: Toronto
   

Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011) 

Post#106 » by spykelee » Sun Jul 3, 2011 1:46 am

Upon some reflection, Do you just do Condit VS GSP post Diaz, or do you maybe do Condit vs Fitch # 1 contenders match??

I'd like to see Condit GSP, but don't want these guys just sitting on the sidelines waiting...
User avatar
REDDzone
RealGM
Posts: 30,209
And1: 5,132
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
 

Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011) 

Post#107 » by REDDzone » Sun Jul 3, 2011 1:46 am

G-Sot and Bader...two hype trains de-railed already tonight.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 27,901
And1: 8,404
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
     

Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011) 

Post#108 » by Bernman » Sun Jul 3, 2011 1:47 am

spykelee wrote:
Bernman wrote:WTF happened? I thought that was a good time for a break considering the combatants.


Tito caught Bader with a punch and stunned him. He then jumped on him and sunk in a Guilitone and Bader tapped.


Anything can happen in a fight, I suppose.

The biggest implication of that fight is Bones' resume taking a hit. He certainly is impressive to the naked eye, but he beat Hamill (deserved to), Bader, Vera, Matyshenko, and Shogun when he was possibly a shell of his former self to win a title. Something to think about.
User avatar
REDDzone
RealGM
Posts: 30,209
And1: 5,132
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
 

Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011) 

Post#109 » by REDDzone » Sun Jul 3, 2011 1:50 am

Bernman wrote:Anything can happen in a fight, I suppose.


That was probably the second most likely outcome behind "Bader by unanimous decision", although the latter was obviously much more likely.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
spykelee
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,469
And1: 3,334
Joined: Sep 14, 2005
Location: Toronto
   

Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011) 

Post#110 » by spykelee » Sun Jul 3, 2011 1:54 am

I don't think Wiman stole that round by being on top... at least not on my score card.
User avatar
REDDzone
RealGM
Posts: 30,209
And1: 5,132
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
 

Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011) 

Post#111 » by REDDzone » Sun Jul 3, 2011 1:55 am

There still isn't a fight in mma I'd rather see than Condit/Diaz.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 27,901
And1: 8,404
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
     

Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011) 

Post#112 » by Bernman » Sun Jul 3, 2011 1:55 am

spykelee wrote:I don't think Wiman stole that round by being on top... at least not on my score card.


It's American MMA judging....
User avatar
REDDzone
RealGM
Posts: 30,209
And1: 5,132
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
 

Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011) 

Post#113 » by REDDzone » Sun Jul 3, 2011 1:57 am

Bernman wrote:
spykelee wrote:I don't think Wiman stole that round by being on top... at least not on my score card.


It's American MMA judging....


God I hope you are wrong about this, although unfortunately you probably aren't.

Not bc I am rooting for Siver, but because Siver won the round imo.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 27,901
And1: 8,404
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
     

Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011) 

Post#114 » by Bernman » Sun Jul 3, 2011 2:01 am

This is the ground and pound he displayed against Cole Miller. On top it pays to have short arms.
spykelee
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,469
And1: 3,334
Joined: Sep 14, 2005
Location: Toronto
   

Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011) 

Post#115 » by spykelee » Sun Jul 3, 2011 2:06 am

Tough fight to score here... Be interesting to see how the judges score this one

Personally, I think Siver wins 29-28
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 27,901
And1: 8,404
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
     

Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011) 

Post#116 » by Bernman » Sun Jul 3, 2011 2:08 am

Close fight. Wiman probably did more damage, in addition to having the control. All comes down to rounds 1 and 3. 29-28 Wiman.
User avatar
REDDzone
RealGM
Posts: 30,209
And1: 5,132
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Location: The Hooker Control Service is Back in Business.
 

Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011) 

Post#117 » by REDDzone » Sun Jul 3, 2011 2:09 am

No idea how to score that one.
Stephen Jackson wrote:Make sure u want these problems. Goggle me slime. Im in da streets.
User avatar
Bernman
RealGM
Posts: 27,901
And1: 8,404
Joined: Aug 05, 2004
     

Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011) 

Post#118 » by Bernman » Sun Jul 3, 2011 2:10 am

Well, I'm out 10 bucks. That's a REALLY surprising decision given the judging precedent lately. I can't be overly mad about it because it was close and they finally favored the stand-up guy and non-American, but I thought Wiman edged him.

I'm curious if judges are conferring these days with all these inexplicable UD's. When I heard a UD I could have sworn that meant Wiman was being awarded the decision. The only clear victory of a round was Wiman in round 2. How did they all agree on 6 debatable scores, especially given the American and wrestling bias lately. That's very curious to me.
User avatar
SpReEfOrAlL
RealGM
Posts: 11,330
And1: 161
Joined: Jul 29, 2002
Location: July 2010!

Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011) 

Post#119 » by SpReEfOrAlL » Sun Jul 3, 2011 2:16 am

Man I love Melvin. He is gonna be a tough fight for anyone.
spykelee
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,469
And1: 3,334
Joined: Sep 14, 2005
Location: Toronto
   

Re: UFC 132 (July 2, 2011) 

Post#120 » by spykelee » Sun Jul 3, 2011 2:16 am

Bernman wrote:Well, I'm out 10 bucks. That's a REALLY surprising decision given the judging precedent lately. I can't be overly mad about it because it was close and they finally favored the stand-up guy and non-American, but I thought Wiman edged him.

I'm curious if judges are conferring these days with all these inexplicable UD's. When I heard a UD I could have sworn that mean Wiman was being awarded the decision. The only clear victory of a round was Wiman in round 2. How did all 3 judges agree those 6 times?


I thought the same thing when I heard UD.

However for me at least, I gave Siver round 1 and 3. It came down to whether or not round 2 was a 10 8 round. If Wiman held that takedown in round 3, I think he may have gotten the nod. but getting it reversed, and then getting rocked afterwards certainly didn't help his cause.

Return to Boxing & Mixed Martial Arts