cowboyronnie wrote:Oh God, of course not. He'd get run through by everyone.
Matt Hughes took down an old but not broke Royce and smashed him, he could have beaten him in a bunch of different ways with zero problem too.
But it's so unfair to imagine 1998 Royce today and therefore to not give HIM a chance to adapt. Simple pieces of knowledge like how to cage walk, not to mention outright training techniques, and what you can do to counter this or that in your opponent, or which martial arts to "mix", which skill-sets, kicks, etc. Immeasurable amounts of things that everyone else knows from the sum of 15 years of MMA training culture, he wouldn't have access to.
All of today's fighters have benefited from the rising of the tide, something well beyond their personal contributions. In no way should they then be credited for that or Royce discredited.
It's why that standard shouldn't hold.
I think that's a fair point that in this era, he'd have better training and more impetus to adapt, so he'd likely improve in the other areas, especially with the attitude he had.
I think it's also fair to say that he had some physical limitations which would have put a cap on how good he could have become in the other eras.
I think the truth is somewhere in the middle. Even though he'd be a no brainer to be on the mount rushmore of MMA because of the impact he had, on a ranking of top mixed martial artists of all time, I have a hard time placing him among recent elites. But anywhere outside top 20 or 30, I can see that. He could have been very good in this era with the proper training. Just not great.