Page 1 of 1

Jacare vs Kennedy for vacant middleweight title ...

Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 7:49 am
by Nemesis21
http://www.sherdog.com/news/news/Jacare ... rown-25579



:o


I like what I've seen from Kennedy in the 3 fights that I have seen of him .

Re: Jacare vs Kennedy for vacant middleweight title ...

Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 3:01 pm
by cowboyronnie
Ooh. That's really weak. Embarrassing.

Re: Jacare vs Kennedy for vacant middleweight title ...

Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:35 pm
by Nemesis21
cowboyronnie wrote:Ooh. That's really weak. Embarrassing.



:roll: You're just a hater.


Both fighters are 12-2, I think it will be a good match.

Re: Jacare vs Kennedy for vacant middleweight title ...

Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 5:29 pm
by Cammo101
I'd rather see a huge tourney, but this will be a very good fight.

Re: Jacare vs Kennedy for vacant middleweight title ...

Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 9:52 pm
by cowboyronnie
Nemesis21 wrote:
cowboyronnie wrote:Ooh. That's really weak. Embarrassing.



:roll: You're just a hater.


Both fighters are 12-2, I think it will be a good match.


A hater of what? What are you talking about?

Re: Jacare vs Kennedy for vacant middleweight title ...

Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 11:49 pm
by Nemesis21
^^^^^^^ Nothing MMA wise is ever good for you .

Re: Jacare vs Kennedy for vacant middleweight title ...

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 1:10 am
by cowboyronnie
What are you talking about?

Re: Jacare vs Kennedy for vacant middleweight title ...

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 2:12 am
by CPT
It could be a decent fight, but I think Jacare is on a tier above Kennedy.

It's not a great fight to arbitrarily pick for your vacant MW championship, and is especially disappointing because of all the talk about a tournament in the one division Strikeforce has enough depth to have one in.

Just more evidence of Strikeforce's lack of organization and long term planning.

Re: Jacare vs Kennedy for vacant middleweight title ...

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 2:19 am
by Cammo101
CPT wrote:It could be a decent fight, but I think Jacare is on a tier above Kennedy.

It's not a great fight to arbitrarily pick for your vacant MW championship, and is especially disappointing because of all the talk about a tournament in the one division Strikeforce has enough depth to have one in.

Just more evidence of Strikeforce's lack of organization and long term planning.


I tend to agree. It should be a very nice fight, but it lacks the star power you would want in a fight to fill a belt held by a very popular (by Strikeforce's standards) fighter. Lawler should be in the 185 title fight IMO. Sure, he lost to Shields and Babalu, but he is still a name and still can beat both those guys. A 4 fighter tourney with Jacare vs. Kennedy and Lawler vs. Cung Le should have been the plan.

Re: Jacare vs Kennedy for vacant middleweight title ...

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 6:48 am
by blkout
Cung Le said he wasn't interested in a tourney. Wanted to just do "super fights" or something like that.

Re: Jacare vs Kennedy for vacant middleweight title ...

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:31 am
by Cammo101
BLKOUT wrote:Cung Le said he wasn't interested in a tourney. Wanted to just do "super fights" or something like that.


I know, but I suspect he might change his mind if it was only a 4 fighter tourney and his first fight was a super fight with Lawler.

Considering the tourney idea has been nixed, I'd like to see Le vs. Lawler as a regular fight.

Re: Jacare vs Kennedy for vacant middleweight title ...

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 8:44 pm
by skflives
I would have loved the tournament but I am happy with Kennedy vs. Jacare. I would have preferred for Kennedy to be built up more since both guys represent the future of Strikeforces's middleweight division but it should still be an interesting bout.

Re: Jacare vs Kennedy for vacant middleweight title ...

Posted: Tue Jul 13, 2010 3:56 pm
by 2009NBAChamps
I think it's a good fight...