Page 1 of 1

MMA linear titles.

Posted: Sat Sep 4, 2010 9:31 pm
by Kaizen
http://sports.yahoo.com/mma/news;_ylt=AuMGXedBSy6ymnIuJELOo049Eo14?slug=dm-linear090310

Heavyweight: Not Brock Lesnar

Nobody beat Emelianenko until June 26, 2010, in San Jose, when Fabricio Werdum submitted him with an armbar in 1:09 in a Strikeforce match. So while Lesnar holds the most publicized version of a world title, Werdum actually holds the linear claim that traces back to Shamrock.

Light heavyweight: All UFC

Because Shamrock’s days as a light heavyweight were limited, the most legitimate title claim remained with UFC, which filled the void after Shamrock left the company with an April 14, 2000, match in Tokyo where Tito Ortiz beat Wanderlei Silva via decision. For the past decade, that title can be perfectly traced in the UFC cage to the championship held today by Mauricio “Shogun” Rua, who beat Lyoto Machida on May 8, 2010 in Montreal.

Middleweight: What you didn’t know about Silva-Sonnen

With Sonnen as the rightful champion, the linear “belt” moved with Sonnen to UFC when WEC dropped its middleweight division. Sonnen then lost to Demian Maia, who lost to Nate Marquardt. Marquardt lost to Sonnen, and the title finally wound up with Silva on August 8, in Oakland, via fifth-round triangle submission.

Welterweight: GSP’s world

The linear title, however, still ends up with current UFC champion Georges St. Pierre, but there is a winding road there.

Nakao lost in Japan to Tetsuji Kato, who lost to Hayato Sakurai, who lost to, of all people, a 167-pound Anderson Silva on August 26, 2001. Silva lost in Japan to Daijyu Takase, who lost to Rodrigo Gracie, also in Japan. Gracie lost to B.J. Penn in Honolulu. Penn returned to UFC and lost to St. Pierre on March 4, 2006. This was prior to St. Pierre’s first title win over Matt Hughes on November 18, 2006, in Sacramento, Calif.

In the past four-and-a-half years, St. Pierre only lost once, to Matt Serra, and immediately regained the title in the rematch.

Lightweight: Two lines of thought

A few months later, both titles underwent name changes. Pulver also ended up in a financial dispute with UFC, and left the organization and fought elsewhere without losing the championship.

Pulver’s first loss after winning the title was in Montreal, where he was knocked out in just 1:13 by Duane “Bang” Ludwig. Ludwig went to Japan and lost by submission to Penn on May 22, 2004 in Tokyo. Penn did not fight at lightweight again for three years, but when he returned, he defeated Pulver, Joe Stevenson to claim the vacant UFC title, Sean Sherk, Kenny Florian and Diego Sanchez. He would actually not lose a lightweight match until April 10, 2010 when he dropped the UFC title to Frankie Edgar, who beat Penn again in a rematch last weekend.

But could Penn truly said to remain the linear lightweight champion when he didn’t fight at that weight for three years, and had to be coaxed back into the division?

If you believe the answer to that question to be “no,” the most logical progression after Penn stopped fighting as a lightweight would be to move to the PRIDE World Lightweight Grand Prix tournament held in Japan in 2005. UFC didn’t even have a lightweight champion at the time, so the top lightweights in the world were involved. But the big issue in that tournament is that the weight class was 161 pounds, not 155, and that does make a difference.

Takanori Gomi won the tournament, beating Luiz Azeredo in the finals on September 25, 2005, via decision. Gomi solidified his claim beating Hayato Sakurai, which created PRIDE’s first lightweight championship.

This version of the linear title takes several turns from there. Gomi lost to Marcus Aurelio, who lost to Mitsuhiro Ishida, who then lost to Gomi. Gomi lost to Nick Diaz in Las Vegas, but the loss was overturned because Diaz tested positive for marijuana. Gomi then lost in one of the great upsets in MMA history, to unheralded Sergey Golyaev on November 1, 2008. Golyaev immediately lost to Eiji Mitsuoka, who lost to Kazunori Yokota, who lost to Tatsuya Kawajiri. By this point, in Japan, the lightweight division was 154 pounds, close enough to the 155 that has been the North American standard.

The title line would end with Dream champion Shinya Aoki, who quickly submitted Kawajiri on July 10, 2010, which was less than three months after Aoki was completely dominated in a Strikeforce fight by Gilbert Melendez.

Re: MMA linear titles.

Posted: Sat Sep 4, 2010 11:06 pm
by REDDzone
Love how even if you start with Royce as the first heavyweight champion (with UFC1 being an open weight grand prix) then the linear title still goes to Werdum. The interesting part to me is the argument of how hollow the UFC belt is because of how many times it was vacated relative to how many champs there have been.

Brock vs. Werdum IMO. :)

Re: MMA linear titles.

Posted: Sun Sep 5, 2010 3:58 am
by skflives
Open weight champion does not equal heavyweight champion. Open weight means there is no set weight class.

Re: MMA linear titles.

Posted: Sun Sep 5, 2010 4:22 am
by REDDzone
Oh, didn't realize that.

Re: MMA linear titles.

Posted: Sun Sep 5, 2010 1:00 pm
by cowboyronnie
But HW is sorta open weight, no? I'm not sure if they enforce the stated minimum weight. I think Petruzelli moved up to face Kimbo on that EliteXC card without weighing between 205 and 265. For example.

Re: MMA linear titles.

Posted: Sun Sep 5, 2010 1:30 pm
by skflives
Well that was a special case as it was almost literally a last minute change. I don't know about the enforcement of minimum weights for heavyweight because in the bigger promotions I don't think its really an issue. And Heavyweight isn't an open weight class. Its just the weight class with the biggest weight range. Its like that in boxing as well. The big difference is that unlike boxing MMA Heavyweights generally have to weigh in at 265 pounds maximum at the official weigh in.

Re: MMA linear titles.

Posted: Sun Sep 5, 2010 1:50 pm
by damo[23]
A weight class is a weight class, if your not between the set boundaries, then its not a "x weight" fight.

This why there are catch weights and "agreements" when people fail to make weight, and why failure to make weight also loses the sanction of title fights as being able to change the hands on the belt (your no longer fighting in your weight class).

Open weight just denotes that there is no fixed weight. I do believe they'd have weigh ins, but more for curiosity's sake.

But what a great article, very interesting to read, though I don't agree with it, the champion is the guy with the belt around his waist!, the true #1 is always up for debate.