UFC 188 (6/13): Velasquez vs. Werdum (Mexico City)

Post #1 » by **CPT** » Mon May 4, 2015 10:20 pm

June 13, 2015 | Mexico City Arena | Mexico City, Mexico

Cain Velasquez vs. Fabricio Werdum for unified heavyweight title
Eddie Alvarez vs. Gilbert Melendez
Kelvin Gastelum vs. Nate Marquardt
Yair Rodriguez vs. Charles Rosa
Angela Hill vs. Tecia Torres
Chico Camus vs. Henry Cejudo
Drew Dober vs. Efrain Escudero
Alejandro Perez vs. Patrick Williams
Johnny Case vs. Francisco Trevino
Augusto Montano vs. Cathal Pendred
Gabriel Benitez vs. Clay Collard
Albert Tumenov vs. Hector Urbina

cowboyronnie · Post #2 » by **cowboyronnie** » Fri May 22, 2015 9:11 pm

Gambling book has this at 4.10 Werdum to 1.22 Cain. ???

Jasen777 · Post #3 » by **Jasen777** » Fri May 22, 2015 9:47 pm

I'd give Werdum more of chance than that.

cowboyronnie · Post #4 » by **cowboyronnie** » Fri May 22, 2015 9:56 pm

For reals. Esp given all the pressure Cain will be feeling to show-up despite any injuries. In Mexico, with Dana on his case, years without a defense?

Jasen777 · Post #5 » by **Jasen777** » Fri May 22, 2015 10:11 pm

Good point, Dana might have to be institutionalized if Cain pulls out again.

REDDzone · Post #6 » by **REDDzone** » Sat May 23, 2015 2:48 am

cowboyronnie wrote:Gambling book has this at 4.10 Werdum to 1.22 Cain. ???

Being that this is an AMERICAN forum, you should translate all your odds to America before postingn from now on.

Thanks. :usa:

AussieBuck · Post #7 » by **AussieBuck** » Wed May 27, 2015 3:22 am

REDDzone wrote:
cowboyronnie wrote:Gambling book has this at 4.10 Werdum to 1.22 Cain. ???

Being that this is an AMERICAN forum, you should translate all your odds to America before postingn from now on.

Thanks.

Is it in your constitution that everything must be measured in bizarre old world units? :nonono:

GoRapstheoriginal · Post #8 » by **GoRapstheoriginal** » Wed May 27, 2015 3:33 am

AussieBuck wrote:
REDDzone wrote:
cowboyronnie wrote:Gambling book has this at 4.10 Werdum to 1.22 Cain. ???

Being that this is an AMERICAN forum, you should translate all your odds to America before postingn from now on.

Thanks.

Is it in your constitution that everything must be measured in bizarre old world units?

What he said. Why on Earth is USA only one/nation that still uses Imperial?
(Or at least the only one that I know/am aware of).

REDDzone · Post #9 » by **REDDzone** » Wed May 27, 2015 3:36 am

In reality yea it is pretty ridiculous.

Jasen777 · Post #10 » by **Jasen777** » Wed May 27, 2015 4:14 am

AussieBuck wrote:Is it in your constitution that everything must be measured in bizarre old world units?

No, that's actually in the 28th amendment.

But anyways American odds just make more sense.

AussieBuck · Post #11 » by **AussieBuck** » Wed May 27, 2015 4:37 am

Jasen777 wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:Is it in your constitution that everything must be measured in bizarre old world units?

No, that's actually in the 28th amendment.

But anyways American odds just make more sense.

I see +500 or -whatever and have no idea what it means, I'm sure I could look it up but the standard way of just showing you what your return is for each dollar bet couldn't be clearer.

Post #12 » by **CPT** » Wed May 27, 2015 4:41 am

Jasen777 wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:Is it in your constitution that everything must be measured in bizarre old world units?

No, that's actually in the 28th amendment.

But anyways American odds just make more sense.

How so?

Defend Fahrenheit and the imperial measurement system while you're at it.

Jasen777 · Post #13 » by **Jasen777** » Wed May 27, 2015 4:53 am

AussieBuck wrote:I see +500 or -whatever and have no idea what it means, I'm sure I could look it up but the standard way of just showing you what your return is for each dollar bet couldn't be clearer.

It means you get 500 if you bet 100. -500 would mean you have to wager 500 to win 100.

Jasen777 · Post #14 » by **Jasen777** » Wed May 27, 2015 4:55 am

CPT wrote:Defend Fahrenheit and the imperial measurement system while you're at it.

There's not 28 amendments.

da pmp · Post #15 » by **da pmp** » Fri May 29, 2015 12:12 am

I can translate the odds... Werdumb has no chance... never did and never will... Werdumb will go on a losing streak

REDDzone · Post #16 » by **REDDzone** » Fri May 29, 2015 1:02 am

Werdumb? Really? Yikes.

Post #17 » by **blkout** » Fri May 29, 2015 1:22 am

I see Joe Silva just typed the letter Z into the UFC roster database and went to town

cowboyronnie · Post #18 » by **cowboyronnie** » Sun May 31, 2015 4:46 pm

Odds haven't changed. Grabbed: bet $46 to make $188.60 on Werdum. For reals.

What am I missing? There's no way Cain has that advantage.

Jasen777 · Post #19 » by **Jasen777** » Sun May 31, 2015 8:47 pm

cowboyronnie wrote:What am I missing? There's no way Cain has that advantage.

I favor Cain, but only barely. Great value on Werdum, IMO.

REDDzone · Post #20 » by **REDDzone** » Tue Jun 9, 2015 3:36 pm

How will Alvarez/Melendez go down?