REDDzone wrote:Susan wrote:How's it a myth? Pre-MMA he could have easily been the best fighter in the world and respected BJJ players have spoken extremely highly of his abilities.
The sport rapidly changed from 1993/94 onwards but from 1980-1994 it's not hard to imagine that he was the best fighter in the world. Of course marketing and self promotion blew that out of proportion but Royce winning UFC 1&2 kind of proved BJJs superiority as a well rounded fighting art over boxing, wrestling and other arts.
I do wonder how well an elite combat samboist would have done if they entered those early tournaments.
Look at who he ACTUALLY fought man. It's a whose who of nobodies, all while avoiding the avid callouts of legitimate fighters like Bas Rutten, Marco Ruas and Sakuraba for years. Also while claiming to be 300-0 in which even his own father Helio said was bullsh*t lol.
Your answer as to how a combat samboist would do was answered by Oleg Taktarov when he won UFC 6 BTW. They weren't about to have guys like Ruas and Oleg in that tournament until Royce was long gone though.
Bas didn't start fighting until 1993. Sakuraba in 1996.
By the time UFC 1 hit, Rickson was 35. Once UFC 1 hit, it changed the fighting world. It's wildly understood that Rickson was the best BJJ practitioner in his family/Brazil in his peak and Rocye's early success in the UFC (beating Dan Severn by triangle was no joke of a victory) kind of solidified BJJ as the early dominant fighting art.
Was Rickson the best fighter in the world in 1997? Hell no, he was 39 and the sport caught up and passed the Gracies by in those 4 years. But consdiering the early success that Royce and Rickson had in 1993-95, and Rickson's dominance in the family, it's completely realistic that he was one of the baddest men in the world from his early 20s to his mid 30s. It's just that the sport was a baby and Rickson talks a little crazy because that's what the world was pre-internet.
Severn beat Oleg 2x and he was in UFC 4.