RealGM

Good for a smaller brand to get this exposure and hopefully it's less of a clown show.

What’s this mean for the overall sponsorship of the ufc?

IDK. I'd never consider wearing Venum but at the same time I'd never wear Reebok either so maybe I'm not their target audience.

Wait so does this mean no UA or Nike? I assumed that was still gonna be a peerage deal altogether.

REDDzone wrote:IDK. I'd never consider wearing Venum but at the same time I'd never wear Reebok either so maybe I'm not their target audience.

At least they've been manufacturing MMA related equipment for a minute. They're not about to have all of those goofs that Reebok had.

Susan wrote:

REDDzone wrote:IDK. I'd never consider wearing Venum but at the same time I'd never wear Reebok either so maybe I'm not their target audience.

At least they've been manufacturing MMA related equipment for a minute. They're not about to have all of those goofs that Reebok had.

Yea but that association their pro AND their con.

REDDzone wrote:

Dupp wrote:Wait so does this mean no UA or Nike? I assumed that was still gonna be a peerage deal altogether.

Yea but that association their pro AND their con.

I’m confused both by my gibberish question and your answer.

Dupp wrote:

REDDzone wrote:

Dupp wrote:Wait so does this mean no UA or Nike? I assumed that was still gonna be a peerage deal altogether.

Yea but that association their pro AND their con.

I’m confused both by my gibberish question and your answer.

Sorry, I meant to quote Susan. Fixed it now.

So is this brand got full sponsorship over UA and Nike or is that going to be something seperate altogether?