WWE: Vegeance

Moderators: Marcus, Stanford

User avatar
DHK
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,985
And1: 3,273
Joined: Aug 24, 2003
Location: Toronto Ontario

Re: WWE: Vegeance 

Post#81 » by DHK » Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:59 am

Super Cena in action tonight...I love how Cena still got to his feet at the end but just couldnt do it in time....
Push down a freight box on him, run him over with a car, put him through a table, beat him with a Little Jimmy, he'd still kick out at 2.5 at most.
Image
User avatar
tugs
RealGM
Posts: 16,878
And1: 2,994
Joined: Jul 22, 2010

Re: WWE: Vegeance 

Post#82 » by tugs » Mon Oct 24, 2011 3:45 am

so I read that Truth and Miz hit their finishers on Punk, SIMULTANEOUSLY? :-?
skbucks1985
RealGM
Posts: 14,895
And1: 2,027
Joined: Apr 29, 2003

Re: WWE: Vegeance 

Post#83 » by skbucks1985 » Mon Oct 24, 2011 4:38 am

tugs wrote:so I read that Truth and Miz hit their finishers on Punk, SIMULTANEOUSLY? :-?


It would've been a lot cooler, except both of there finishers kinda suck.
skbucks1985
RealGM
Posts: 14,895
And1: 2,027
Joined: Apr 29, 2003

Re: WWE: Vegeance 

Post#84 » by skbucks1985 » Mon Oct 24, 2011 4:44 am

I thought it was a decent C-list PPV. All of the matches were average-above average, I thought the divas match was actually decent better than any of the matches Beth had with Kelly. It did seem like one of the big motives was to start the build towards Survivor Series.
studcrackers
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 52,226
And1: 6,100
Joined: Oct 31, 2004
Location: Getting hit in the head
         

Re: WWE: Vegeance 

Post#85 » by studcrackers » Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:28 am

i really really enjoyed the ppv, the show/henry match was stellar even w/o the ring collapsing, the ring collapsing just brought it up 10 notches. was curious how the main event was gonna play out after that but the 2 guys made due. im curious how hurt show/henry were after that, i dont think henry knew where he was.

the match endings were pretty much all predictable (though i was surprised when henry kicked outta the superchokeslam) but it didnt bother me, aside from super cena and the wwe's inability to ever let a hell win clean over cena (and pretty much all faces for that matter) pumped for survivor series
Jugs wrote: I saw two buttholes
User avatar
SpReEfOrAlL
RealGM
Posts: 11,330
And1: 161
Joined: Jul 29, 2002
Location: July 2010!

Re: WWE: Vegeance 

Post#86 » by SpReEfOrAlL » Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:07 pm

I really hate the fact that finishers mean almost nothing now a days. I remember when the only people who would really kick out of a finisher were undertaker and kane. And that was part of their gimmick. Now a days its common place to see just about anyone kick out of something. Uncreative and pretty lame.
User avatar
Coach Smiley
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,060
And1: 980
Joined: Jun 30, 2009
 

Re: WWE: Vegeance 

Post#87 » by Coach Smiley » Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:28 pm

man oh man still shaking my head at CM Punk, Triple H comes out second, Punk takes the loss and disappears, and the focus is Nash vs. Triple H, right in front of our eyes since CM re-signed we are back to status quo and the same complaints people have had for ages

Didn't like how the acted like Henry/Show finish was somehow unique, the EXACT same finish happened in 2003 to the tee, and it was even featured on their OMG dvd. At least acknowledge the past and stop insulting our intelligence, and why do they call a no-contest just count them out i.e. double count out

Cena vs. ADR was surpisingly good, although stil hate that stipulations don't mean anything, i.e. random HIAC for no reason and random LMS for no reason, and lol at Cena changing his look, less fodder for Rock I guess

Last 3 months were literally a waste/placeholder. BRING ON SURVIVOR SERIES!
User avatar
whysoserious
RealGM
Posts: 30,555
And1: 8,634
Joined: Jun 19, 2004
       

Re: WWE: Vegeance 

Post#88 » by whysoserious » Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:42 pm

Coach Smiley wrote:man oh man still shaking my head at CM Punk, Triple H comes out second, Punk takes the loss and disappears, and the focus is Nash vs. Triple H, right in front of our eyes since CM re-signed we are back to status quo and the same complaints people have had for ages


I didn't watch it but this is typical Kliq behaviour that they've all been accused of in the past. The second something starts to get hot, they latch on and takeover. This really pisses me off because they had a great story on a silver platter with Punk walking away with the belt and they completely effed it up upon his return.

The message keeps coming from WWE that Punk is not being pushed aside but their actions in front of the camera suggest otherwise.

Status quo, Super Cena continue's his run while the hottest thing they had is being pushed aside.

Three guys that definitely deserve more focus at this time - Punk, Rhodes and Ziggler.
User avatar
Dunthreevy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,946
And1: 1,353
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Indianapolis, IN
     

Re: WWE: Vegeance 

Post#89 » by Dunthreevy » Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:49 pm

Image

I wouldn't be at all surprised if Triple H is injured after that. I haven't seen the ppv yet, but that image looks bad, real bad.
Feel the rhythm! Feel the rhyme! Get on up, it's bobsled time!
User avatar
Dunthreevy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,946
And1: 1,353
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Indianapolis, IN
     

Re: WWE: Vegeance 

Post#90 » by Dunthreevy » Mon Oct 24, 2011 3:06 pm

Just saw video of the Big Show/Henry ring collapse. It had to be rigged because the ring collapsed the EXACT same way it did on the Big Show/Brock collapse back in the day.
Feel the rhythm! Feel the rhyme! Get on up, it's bobsled time!
skbucks1985
RealGM
Posts: 14,895
And1: 2,027
Joined: Apr 29, 2003

Re: WWE: Vegeance 

Post#91 » by skbucks1985 » Mon Oct 24, 2011 5:44 pm

I don't mean to sound like a dick, but HHH being injured wouldn't be the worst thing in the world. On November 20, 2011 they are going to have a massive Survivor Series match and right now it appears that 20% of that match will be HHH and Kevin Nash. IN 2011! So if HHH isn't able to perform and someone under the age of 40 gets in the match, I wouldn't be too upset.
User avatar
Dunthreevy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,946
And1: 1,353
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Indianapolis, IN
     

Re: WWE: Vegeance 

Post#92 » by Dunthreevy » Mon Oct 24, 2011 7:06 pm

safi wrote:I don't mean to sound like a dick, but HHH being injured wouldn't be the worst thing in the world. On November 20, 2011 they are going to have a massive Survivor Series match and right now it appears that 20% of that match will be HHH and Kevin Nash. IN 2011! So if HHH isn't able to perform and someone under the age of 40 gets in the match, I wouldn't be too upset.


Too late :lol:

I get where you're coming from though.

Also, that image looked worse than the actual video. I watched it on my lunch break and he didn't really land on his neck at all. His shoulder seemed to take the brunt of the fall. Still could potentially be injured, but not as severely as it looked like he might be.
Feel the rhythm! Feel the rhyme! Get on up, it's bobsled time!
User avatar
Dunthreevy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,946
And1: 1,353
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Indianapolis, IN
     

Re: WWE: Vegeance 

Post#93 » by Dunthreevy » Mon Oct 24, 2011 10:18 pm

Anyone else wondering why they had Cody Rhodes come out after Orton?
Feel the rhythm! Feel the rhyme! Get on up, it's bobsled time!

Return to Pro Wrestling