WWE to Negotiate TV Deals at once for 1st time

Moderators: Marcus, Stanford

User avatar
kblo247
RealGM
Posts: 13,834
And1: 2,131
Joined: Apr 16, 2011

WWE to Negotiate TV Deals at once for 1st time 

Post#1 » by kblo247 » Tue Dec 17, 2013 6:12 pm

If USA Network wants to retain its biggest hit, “Monday Night Raw,” it’s gonna have to pay.

Next month, for the first time, WWE will shop the rights to “Raw” and all of its shows at the same time — a list of weekly series that includes Syfy’s “Friday Night SmackDown,” “Main Event” on ION Television, the CW’s “Saturday Morning Slam” and reality show “Total Divas” on E!

The goal is to significantly increase the $139.5 million in TV licensing fees WWE earns each year for its shows, and attempt to get closer to the rich network deals that sports organizations like the NBA, NHL NASCAR, as well as soccer command.

In the past, deals for WWE’s series were brokered individually on a staggered timeline, usually every three to four years or so. But WWE has spent nearly two years quietly lining up rights to expire simultaneously in an effort to secure higher fees and appease shareholders who have grown increasingly frustrated that the company’s TV deals are not worth more at a time when live “event” programming is more valuable than ever.

By offering up all its shows at once, “We’re letting the marketplace determine if it’s interested in all or pieces,” says Michelle Wilson, WWE’s chief revenue and marketing officer. The company also is tackling a self-inflicted perception problem. For years, it’s touted its over-the-top characters and soap opera storylines ahead of the live aspect of the year-round action in the ring.

“We’ve had to evolve our thinking,” Wilson says. “We are clearly entertainment-based, but if you think about the characteristics of our brand, it’s live action, and that’s sports. We want to be compensated for a live audience, since live content is getting a very significant premium in the marketplace.”

The company cites Nascar’s impressive dealmaking this summer as an example. The racing league secured a new 10-year deal with NBC and Fox worth $820 million a year. And that increase came in the face of declining ratings for many of its races. WWE argues that “Raw” and “SmackDown” alone are just as attractive, with a rabid fanbase that’s helped build networks, and its series are diverse in ethnicity and age.

Combined, the shows air 156 episodes a year that average a 2.2 household rating. Nascar airs 154 races and averages a 1.38 household rating among viewers, who are 92% white and over 50. WWE’s audience is far more diverse and broken out fairly evenly among age groups. A selling point is that 44% of them are under 34.

That’s helped boost gross ratings points, something Madison Avenue keeps a close eye on. Another plus for WWE: 90% of “Raw’s” and “SmackDown’s” viewers watch the shows live or within the next day, making the shows DVR proof. (Think NBC’s latest stunt with “The Sound of Music”.)

“The value of live content has gone from becoming important to essential,” says George Barrios, WWE’s chief strategy and financial officer. “As a network, if you don’t have live must-see content your existence comes into question.”

To make its show more attractive, WWE is considering a live version of its two-hour “SmackDown,” which currently is taped on Tuesday before its Friday airing. To do that, costs to produce the series would increase, due to scheduling, and the show would likely need to move to a new night. But WWE would be willing to make the switch in return for a better fee for the series.

WWE added a third hour to “Raw” last year (starting with its 1,000th episode) in an effort to expand storylines, increase exposure for its stars, but also enable USA to generate more advertising revenue after three-hour specials performed well.

The Stamford, Conn.-based company ideally would like to partner with a conglomerate that owns a variety of channels the way NBCU currently airs many of WWE’s shows. Along with “Raw,” “SmackDown” and “Total Divas,” specials like “Tribute to the Troops” and a shortened version of its annual “WrestleMania” pay-per-view also air on NBC. WWE already has reached out to or held meetings with the expected list of players who own a variety of channels hungry for programming, including A&E, Disney, Viacom, 21st Century Fox and Discovery.

Negotiations and bids can’t take place until Feb. 15, when NBCU accepts or rejects WWE’s final offer; other bids are due Feb. 28, with WWE set to select its media partners by March 4. Should a new deal with another conglom happen, WWE’s shows wouldn’t move to a new network until October.

Yet even as WWE makes the rounds of media congloms, industry insiders say they believe there is no way that NBCUniversal will loosen its grip on WWE. “Monday Night Raw” is a huge contributor to USA’s bottom line and weekly ratings stats; without “Raw” on its schedule, USA Network would drop from first place to as low as No. 4 among basic entertainment networks, costing the company premium advertising dollars. Syfy would also lose a sizable audience without “SmackDown,” which has raised viewership by 35% for the network. “Divas” is a hit for E! but has perhaps has benefitted WWE more, given that it’s helped the company attract more women, which currently make up around 35% of its audience.

The third hour of “Raw” is up 44% vs. programming that aired in the timeslot last year. “Saturday Morning Slam” is up 34% for the CW, “Main Event” is up 25% for ION and “Divas” has boosted ratings 166% for E!

WWE’s pay-per-views, including annual juggernauts “WrestleMania” and “SummerSlam” won’t be part of the negotiations, since those will air on the company’s new subscription-based WWE Network, which will also include original series and access to the company’s VOD library
. Launch plans for the channel, which WWE sees as its own NFL Network, have yet to be revealed. However, WWE maintains that it could break even on the venture if it can sign up 800,000 to 1 million subscribers willing to pay around $10 to $14 per month.

Digital next-day rights to shows would also become part of any new licensing deal with a TV network, costing Hulu Plus the programming it currently airs. In the past, TV Everywhere wasn’t a hot topic for networks when WWE inked its current network deals.

“Partners who pay licensing fees are now expecting to get the TV Everywhere distribution rights,” Barrios says.

As it tries to land a better deal, WWE is ready to flex some of its marketing muscle, eager to show off how it’s been able to attract more high-profile advertisers to sponsor its PPVs and tie-in with its wrestlers, known as Superstars. Those now include General Motors, Ford Motor Co., Disney, Doritos, DreamWorks, Paramount, Kmart, Subway, Taco Bell, Colgate, Frito-Lay, Schick and Mattel — attractive to any network, since the channels are the entities that sell and earn the ad dollars. WWE controls PPV sponsorships, digital ad sales and talent appearances.

Other revenue streams also must be taken into consideration. WWE’s social media teams also connect with millions of fans daily, while its magazine, websites, toy lines, YouTube channel (for which it produces 10 to 12 hours of original programming a year) and videogames are popular — and ratings rise for shows that feature WWE’s talent roster, including John Cena (see above), as guest stars.

WWE is a proven ratings juggernaut, making USA Network No. 1 for the past eight years and delivering more average viewers than every sports property, with the exception of the NFL,” said WWE chairman and CEO Vince McMahon in a statement to Variety. “Given the increasing demand for live, DVR-proof content, we believe the market will value our programming significantly above where we’ve been in the past.”

Adds Wilson of the upcoming negotiations: “This is new territory we’re in. All of the things we’ve done over the last five years have helped raise the profile of our brand and there’s recognition from the marketplace of what we deliver. Now it’s up to the marketplace to tell us if we’re worth it.”

- Variety

Vince went the smart route, they basically could actually get a place like Fox Sports to say we can make ourselves a juggernaut.

Disney is also interesting because that's ESPN they are talking with. Yeah Disney/Marvel/ESPN/ABC is pretty big. I mean getting all their coverage on espn 2 and maybe a couple specials on ABC would be huge. Plus as you said some animation would be easier as would some Disney movie appearances and what not. Fox has the most to gain. They really do as Raw, SD, and the other 3 shows could get FX and FS1 huge viewership and money as that's a long lost of new sponsors they've gained

The idea of a live SmackDown is huge. I also still say fox sports 1 would go over big for that networks total viewership. And espn 2 would be big if they got the talking heads to talk about them and portray them in a positive manner. Some one will pony up

NXT and superstars seem to be network properties
Image
User avatar
Dunthreevy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,946
And1: 1,353
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Indianapolis, IN
     

Re: WWE to Negotiate TV Deals at once for 1st time 

Post#2 » by Dunthreevy » Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:04 pm

Verrrrrry interesting and smart on WWE's part to line up these expiring deals to maximize profitability for the future.
Feel the rhythm! Feel the rhyme! Get on up, it's bobsled time!
Celtics_Champs
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,596
And1: 8,074
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
Location: TD Garden
 

Re: WWE to Negotiate TV Deals at once for 1st time 

Post#3 » by Celtics_Champs » Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:15 pm

The idea of WWE on ESPN or Fox sports is mind boggling.

Did you guys like USA or TNN better? My rankings would be

1. USA nineties
2. TNN early 00's
3. USA current

No idea if they were apart of any other network before that.
NeedsMoreCheese
RealGM
Posts: 43,042
And1: 8,369
Joined: Apr 22, 2002
   

Re: WWE to Negotiate TV Deals at once for 1st time 

Post#4 » by NeedsMoreCheese » Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:29 pm

iCooter wrote:The idea of WWE on ESPN or Fox sports is mind boggling.

Did you guys like USA or TNN better? My rankings would be

1. USA nineties
2. TNN early 00's
3. USA current

No idea if they were apart of any other network before that.



NBC??
Celtics_Champs
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,596
And1: 8,074
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
Location: TD Garden
 

Re: WWE to Negotiate TV Deals at once for 1st time 

Post#5 » by Celtics_Champs » Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:34 pm

Kohl Is A Mome wrote:
iCooter wrote:The idea of WWE on ESPN or Fox sports is mind boggling.

Did you guys like USA or TNN better? My rankings would be

1. USA nineties
2. TNN early 00's
3. USA current

No idea if they were apart of any other network before that.



NBC??


Raw was on NBC? Too young for that then.
NeedsMoreCheese
RealGM
Posts: 43,042
And1: 8,369
Joined: Apr 22, 2002
   

Re: WWE to Negotiate TV Deals at once for 1st time 

Post#6 » by NeedsMoreCheese » Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:34 pm

iCooter wrote:
Kohl Is A Mome wrote:
iCooter wrote:The idea of WWE on ESPN or Fox sports is mind boggling.

Did you guys like USA or TNN better? My rankings would be

1. USA nineties
2. TNN early 00's
3. USA current

No idea if they were apart of any other network before that.



NBC??


Raw was on NBC? Too young for that then.

No, but Main Event or whatever it was was. I thought we were just talking about all WWE shows not Raw.
Celtics_Champs
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,596
And1: 8,074
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
Location: TD Garden
 

Re: WWE to Negotiate TV Deals at once for 1st time 

Post#7 » by Celtics_Champs » Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:39 pm

no, all shows would be fun to rank though. I'd put Smackdown on UPN early days way up there. They'd lead into some funny shows.
NeedsMoreCheese
RealGM
Posts: 43,042
And1: 8,369
Joined: Apr 22, 2002
   

Re: WWE to Negotiate TV Deals at once for 1st time 

Post#8 » by NeedsMoreCheese » Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:45 pm

iCooter wrote:no, all shows would be fun to rank though. I'd put Smackdown on UPN early days way up there. They'd lead into some funny shows.

Early smackdown on UPN was the best
User avatar
kblo247
RealGM
Posts: 13,834
And1: 2,131
Joined: Apr 16, 2011

Re: WWE to Negotiate TV Deals at once for 1st time 

Post#9 » by kblo247 » Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:46 pm

Early UPN was the best before wwe pissed off Viacom by leaving spike. After that they got preempt end so much and shuffled to Friday.

I would probably rank them

- Raw is War on USA
- Raw on TNN
- Early UPN
- Raw the solo brand on spike
- UPN with sd the brand
- CW
- SyFy SD
- ECW on SyFy
- SD on my TV

They got preempted around here a lot on. my TV. I remember the sd before a rumble airing the same night of the fn rumble
Image
NeedsMoreCheese
RealGM
Posts: 43,042
And1: 8,369
Joined: Apr 22, 2002
   

Re: WWE to Negotiate TV Deals at once for 1st time 

Post#10 » by NeedsMoreCheese » Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:48 pm

I may be biased on that though because i never got to watch Raw because we didn't have cable back then. So the only time i got to see Raw was occasionally at someone elses house. Missed out on watching a lot of good stuff live.
User avatar
kblo247
RealGM
Posts: 13,834
And1: 2,131
Joined: Apr 16, 2011

Re: WWE to Negotiate TV Deals at once for 1st time 

Post#11 » by kblo247 » Tue Dec 17, 2013 11:52 pm

If you're espn, you can rule the world literally.

Air MNF on espn. Then air Raw on espn 2 during football season. When football is over shift Raw to espn. They would have the two highest rated things on both their stations every Monday night in primetime. Even SD on SyFy goes overlooked. SD has been the 1-3 show on cable every Friday night even in basketball season despite it being pretaped. If they took SD live, they would get more viewers and boost things up. SD is still the second longest running show in history episode count wise, so its valuable and a move to Thursdays for example could steal TNTs nba audience.

Fox to me is the dark horse when it comes to spreading everything out. They can offer Raw on FX, SD on FS1, Main Event on FS2, FXX for stuff like Total Divas. They definitely have the channels available to them across the board.

The biggest thing would be credibility. To air on espn they would get less criticism and maybe even a spot on the ticker, same for fox. Vince has to love that idea. He can either get two great other avenues or make NBC pay out their ass and still be happy.
Image
User avatar
kblo247
RealGM
Posts: 13,834
And1: 2,131
Joined: Apr 16, 2011

Re: WWE to Negotiate TV Deals at once for 1st time 

Post#12 » by kblo247 » Wed Dec 18, 2013 1:08 am

As we mentioned earlier, the WWE will undertake a monumental TV-rights negotiations next month. For the first time ever, the WWE will take their entire slate of TV programs to the open marketplace with many large television networks throwing hundreds-of-million dollar bids at them for their rights. The shows – USA’s “Raw”, Syfy’s “Friday Night SmackDown,” “Main Event” on ION Television, the CW’s “Saturday Morning Slam” and reality show “Total Divas” on E! — will all move under one parent company. According to various sources, ESPN and Fox Sports are extremely likely to end up as NBC-Universals main competition in securing WWE’s television rights.

Early last week, I received word from a well-placed ESPN source that Vince McMahon and team of high-ranking WWE officials have already met with ESPN leaders in regards to moving their programming to their family of networks. Why ESPN? Well, there’s three reasons. First, Vince McMahon has always wanted the WWE to have a program on ESPN and has long-wished for the day that WWE programming are covered alongside of other sports. Second, ESPN has made is known that they wish to have a combat sport that can rival UFC on their main competitors station, Fox Sports 1. Furthermore, they fear seeing the WWE end up on the Fox networks in any capacity. And, finally, the source stated that the WWE is seeking “trusted, experienced” television hosts to assist with the WWE Network. Under an ESPN partnership, the WWE would be able to again utilize Jonathan Coachman and Todd Grisham to give the network a few well-known faces and credibility.

The same source mentioned that 90′s WWE host Todd Pettengill is also being considered for a role with the WWE Network.

That chief competition is, of course, Fox Sports 1. A WWE source familiar with the meetings that have taken place informed me last week that Fox is considered the “dark horse” in negotiations. With Fox Sports 1′s launch being pushed hard by the company, their ratings have fallen extremely flat. Currently, UFC programming is keeping FS1 afloat. Fox is “salivating” at the thought of carrying both WWE and UFC programming on their networks and feels that this tandem would quickly grow their sports offerings exponentially. Under this deal, RAW and Smackdown would be seen on Fox Sports 1 or FX and quickly help to lead those networks to being among the weekly top three most-watched cable networks. Fox also sees Fox Sports 2 as the perfect home for “Main Event” and even a weekly NXT program. Fox also feels as if the WWE’s umbrella of shows meshes well with their main demographic.

http://wrestlechat.net/exclusive-espn-f ... g-in-2014/


Theme of 14 seems to be Vince is going to eat with these new tv deals and the network, raking in more than ever before like Forbes declared months ago.

Espn, fox, or current setup? I'm leaning toward fox if Raw gets FX. But boy espn could rule Mondays if they went Raw on espn 2 simultaneously during football season and then shift over to the main station during the off season
Image
User avatar
kblo247
RealGM
Posts: 13,834
And1: 2,131
Joined: Apr 16, 2011

Re: WWE to Negotiate TV Deals at once for 1st time 

Post#13 » by kblo247 » Wed Dec 18, 2013 1:15 am

From Forbes so people get how hit the wwe product is even if they don't like the pg

Image
Image
User avatar
whysoserious
RealGM
Posts: 30,555
And1: 8,634
Joined: Jun 19, 2004
       

Re: WWE to Negotiate TV Deals at once for 1st time 

Post#14 » by whysoserious » Wed Dec 18, 2013 2:51 am

How does ESPN justify showing results from real sports and then having WWE pre-determined results on it's ticker as well?

I know this is a dream of Vince McMahon but he killed the 'it's a sport' thing a long time ago and now he wants it on ESPN, a sports network?
skbucks1985
RealGM
Posts: 14,893
And1: 2,025
Joined: Apr 29, 2003

Re: WWE to Negotiate TV Deals at once for 1st time 

Post#15 » by skbucks1985 » Wed Dec 18, 2013 3:28 am

Yeah, I don't see any way ESPN has any real interest in this bidding war. I could see Fox Sports or NBC Sports because those are fledgling channels, so having a show that garners a pretty consistent 4-5 million viewers every Monday is the type of thing they would really value. But having wrestling is just pretty anti-thetical to the ESPN brand.
User avatar
Dunthreevy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,946
And1: 1,353
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Indianapolis, IN
     

Re: WWE to Negotiate TV Deals at once for 1st time 

Post#16 » by Dunthreevy » Wed Dec 18, 2013 4:17 pm

iCooter wrote:The idea of WWE on ESPN or Fox sports is mind boggling.

Did you guys like USA or TNN better? My rankings would be

1. USA nineties
2. TNN early 00's
3. USA current

No idea if they were apart of any other network before that.


When it was on TNN I wasn't watching much wrestling so I don't even remember that era.
Feel the rhythm! Feel the rhyme! Get on up, it's bobsled time!

Return to Pro Wrestling