WWE TV Thread XIX

Moderators: Marcus, Stanford

skbucks1985
RealGM
Posts: 14,893
And1: 2,025
Joined: Apr 29, 2003

Re: WWE TV Thread XIX 

Post#2001 » by skbucks1985 » Tue Aug 25, 2015 2:05 am

studcrackers wrote:
safi wrote:
Stanford wrote:The Diva Revolution has made women's wrestling worse, I'm sure of it.


Disagree. The story line sucks but it introduced three women who were immediately top tier performers in the division and eventually (hopefully as soon as possible) the dust will clear on this story line and what we'll be left with is a much more talented division.


but nobody really has faith there'll be a good story in place for them, and by the team it does happen, all their momentum will be gone and we'll go back to not giving a sh*t. you can't just keep giving us 6 man matches week in and week out and saying it's a revolution 100 times a week w/o anything ever f*ckin happening.

it's the same reason nobody gives a sh*t about an orton/sheamus feud and the same reason people dont give a f*ck about most feuds b/c those guys face each other 10 times before they square off at a god damn ppv


Sheamus and Orton are incredibly overexposed and so taking two guys that are incredibly overexposed and putting them against each other is a recipe for disaster.

I think a good wrestling match can make up for a lot. If Charlotte wins the title and faces Sasha or Becky the next month and they put on a sterling 15 minute match it can make us forget about a lot of the crap we've seen.
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 53,571
And1: 18,824
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: WWE TV Thread XIX 

Post#2002 » by Stanford » Tue Aug 25, 2015 2:07 am

Cena's on fire
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 53,571
And1: 18,824
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: WWE TV Thread XIX 

Post#2003 » by Stanford » Tue Aug 25, 2015 2:07 am

Somebody make a new thread quick like!
studcrackers
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 52,226
And1: 6,100
Joined: Oct 31, 2004
Location: Getting hit in the head
         

Re: WWE TV Thread XIX 

Post#2004 » by studcrackers » Tue Aug 25, 2015 2:12 am

safi wrote:
studcrackers wrote:
safi wrote:
Disagree. The story line sucks but it introduced three women who were immediately top tier performers in the division and eventually (hopefully as soon as possible) the dust will clear on this story line and what we'll be left with is a much more talented division.


but nobody really has faith there'll be a good story in place for them, and by the team it does happen, all their momentum will be gone and we'll go back to not giving a sh*t. you can't just keep giving us 6 man matches week in and week out and saying it's a revolution 100 times a week w/o anything ever f*ckin happening.

it's the same reason nobody gives a sh*t about an orton/sheamus feud and the same reason people dont give a f*ck about most feuds b/c those guys face each other 10 times before they square off at a god damn ppv


Sheamus and Orton are incredibly overexposed and so taking two guys that are incredibly overexposed and putting them against each other is a recipe for disaster.

I think a good wrestling match can make up for a lot. If Charlotte wins the title and faces Sasha or Becky the next month and they put on a sterling 15 minute match it can make us forget about a lot of the crap we've seen.


and after they put together an amazing 15 minute match, they'll have them do it 6 more times before the next ppv
Jugs wrote: I saw two buttholes
User avatar
Vandal Savage
Suspended
Posts: 3,869
And1: 1,123
Joined: Mar 06, 2008

Re: WWE TV Thread XIX 

Post#2005 » by Vandal Savage » Tue Aug 25, 2015 2:14 am

Cole just reference Vince Bday.
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 53,571
And1: 18,824
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: WWE TV Thread XIX 

Post#2006 » by Stanford » Tue Aug 25, 2015 2:15 am

I swear to god guys, I'll make the most boring thread title ever. I'll do it. Make a new thread. gogogo
skbucks1985
RealGM
Posts: 14,893
And1: 2,025
Joined: Apr 29, 2003

Re: WWE TV Thread XIX 

Post#2007 » by skbucks1985 » Tue Aug 25, 2015 2:16 am

studcrackers wrote:
safi wrote:
studcrackers wrote:
but nobody really has faith there'll be a good story in place for them, and by the team it does happen, all their momentum will be gone and we'll go back to not giving a sh*t. you can't just keep giving us 6 man matches week in and week out and saying it's a revolution 100 times a week w/o anything ever f*ckin happening.

it's the same reason nobody gives a sh*t about an orton/sheamus feud and the same reason people dont give a f*ck about most feuds b/c those guys face each other 10 times before they square off at a god damn ppv


Sheamus and Orton are incredibly overexposed and so taking two guys that are incredibly overexposed and putting them against each other is a recipe for disaster.

I think a good wrestling match can make up for a lot. If Charlotte wins the title and faces Sasha or Becky the next month and they put on a sterling 15 minute match it can make us forget about a lot of the crap we've seen.


and after they put together an amazing 15 minute match, they'll have them do it 6 more times before the next ppv


But the thing is they don't. You have Charlotte, Sasha, Becky, Paige, Natalya, Naomi, Nikki's not quite on their level but she's decent. And Emma's doing well with her heel character in NXT and Bayley's great and those two will probably be up within a calendar year. That's a good division.
studcrackers
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 52,226
And1: 6,100
Joined: Oct 31, 2004
Location: Getting hit in the head
         

Re: WWE TV Thread XIX 

Post#2008 » by studcrackers » Tue Aug 25, 2015 2:16 am

Stanford wrote:I swear to god guys, I'll make the most boring thread title ever. I'll do it. Make a new thread. gogogo


you're the mod, you do it
Jugs wrote: I saw two buttholes
Dirkbaka
Banned User
Posts: 1,168
And1: 446
Joined: Jul 17, 2015

Re: WWE TV Thread XIX 

Post#2009 » by Dirkbaka » Tue Aug 25, 2015 2:17 am

Cena stays in the title picture? Why?????? Ugh.
studcrackers
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 52,226
And1: 6,100
Joined: Oct 31, 2004
Location: Getting hit in the head
         

Re: WWE TV Thread XIX 

Post#2010 » by studcrackers » Tue Aug 25, 2015 2:18 am

hearing renee say to john "you just gave an AA to Jon Stewart?" made me laugh. what an absurd line i never ever thought id hear in my life
Jugs wrote: I saw two buttholes
Dirkbaka
Banned User
Posts: 1,168
And1: 446
Joined: Jul 17, 2015

Re: WWE TV Thread XIX 

Post#2011 » by Dirkbaka » Tue Aug 25, 2015 2:21 am

So this is team "buried by Cena" vs Team "we don't care the fans like you, you will be a jobber and like it".

Nice.
studcrackers
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 52,226
And1: 6,100
Joined: Oct 31, 2004
Location: Getting hit in the head
         

Re: WWE TV Thread XIX 

Post#2012 » by studcrackers » Tue Aug 25, 2015 2:22 am

safi wrote:
studcrackers wrote:
safi wrote:
Sheamus and Orton are incredibly overexposed and so taking two guys that are incredibly overexposed and putting them against each other is a recipe for disaster.

I think a good wrestling match can make up for a lot. If Charlotte wins the title and faces Sasha or Becky the next month and they put on a sterling 15 minute match it can make us forget about a lot of the crap we've seen.


and after they put together an amazing 15 minute match, they'll have them do it 6 more times before the next ppv


But the thing is they don't. You have Charlotte, Sasha, Becky, Paige, Natalya, Naomi, Nikki's not quite on their level but she's decent. And Emma's doing well with her heel character in NXT and Bayley's great and those two will probably be up within a calendar year. That's a good division.


i agree they dont have to, but they also dont to have reigns/ambrose vs the wyatts in some variation every week, or owens/cesaro involved fighting in every show somehow, or orton/sheamus. there's a wealth of talent, but rarely do they have someone fight someone random
Jugs wrote: I saw two buttholes

Return to Pro Wrestling