Page 1 of 9
Re: WWE: Hell In A Cell
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 5:24 pm
by Shemy
no way in hell cena loses
Re: WWE: Hell In A Cell
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 3:52 pm
by Cliff Levingston
Cena should lose, but he won't. What a sad way to end the Nexus angle, which was the best thing to happen to Raw in years.
Re: WWE: Hell In A Cell
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2010 1:01 am
by Vandal Savage
Cliff Levingston wrote:Cena should lose, but he won't. What a sad way to end the Nexus angle, which was the best thing to happen to Raw in years.
This may be true, but Wade Barret is the only one important and he'll be fine.
Re: WWE: Hell In A Cell
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2010 1:35 am
by skbucks1985
Ted Dibiase wrote:Cliff Levingston wrote:Cena should lose, but he won't. What a sad way to end the Nexus angle, which was the best thing to happen to Raw in years.
This may be true, but Wade Barret is the only one important and he'll be fine.
He's certainly the most polished and the most ready to be a top of card performer. But I think Skip Sheffield and Justin Gabriel both have bright futures. And although it'll probably take him a bit longer I think Michael Tarver could be a solid mid-card guy
Re: WWE: Hell In A Cell
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2010 4:59 am
by Jackson 5ive
nm
Re: WWE: Hell In A Cell
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2010 5:18 am
by CapeCrusader
Thanx for the spoiler man...I know Raw was double taped. But some people on the board would rather watch it instead of read the spoilers. Thats why we have a spoiler thread.
Re: WWE: Hell In A Cell
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2010 5:20 am
by CapeCrusader
safi wrote:He's certainly the most polished and the most ready to be a top of card performer. But I think Skip Sheffield and Justin Gabriel both have bright futures. And although it'll probably take him a bit longer I think Michael Tarver could be a solid mid-card guy
I haven't given up on Otunga. But besides Barrett and Gabriel. Sheffield looks like the next in line from Nexus to step up and be a star. He was very key on all the attacks they had so far in their run.
Re: WWE: Hell In A Cell
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2010 5:34 am
by Jackson 5ive
Sorry about that CapeCrusader, I edited my OP, (If you edit my OP out of yours maybe not many saw it) I thought it was announced last week, quite frankly I forgot Raw was taped already for this week, my mistake.
Re: WWE: Hell In A Cell
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2010 6:03 am
by skbucks1985
CapeCrusader wrote:safi wrote:He's certainly the most polished and the most ready to be a top of card performer. But I think Skip Sheffield and Justin Gabriel both have bright futures. And although it'll probably take him a bit longer I think Michael Tarver could be a solid mid-card guy
I haven't given up on Otunga. But besides Barrett and Gabriel. Sheffield looks like the next in line from Nexus to step up and be a star. He was very key on all the attacks they had so far in their run.
Perhaps, but right now his niche is solely as a tag wrestler with a guy who can carry him in the ring and he can carry on the mic. Other than Khali, he's probably the worst worker in the company and if he wants to be a successful singles wrestler on any level he's got literally years ahead of him.
Re: WWE: Hell In A Cell
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2010 6:46 am
by CapeCrusader
Sheffield isn't too far off. But Otunga will get it eventually I think.
Re: WWE: Hell In A Cell
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:45 pm
by Jackson 5ive
Sheffield can play a Batista role imo.
Re: WWE: Hell In A Cell
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 4:06 am
by CapeCrusader
The triple threat match added should be good. But the stipulation is stupid.
Re: WWE: Hell In A Cell
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:18 pm
by Jackson 5ive
CapeCrusader wrote:The triple threat match added should be good. But the stipulation is stupid.
Agreed, Morrison heel turn?
Re: WWE: Hell In A Cell
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 9:42 pm
by skbucks1985
Jackson 5ive wrote:CapeCrusader wrote:The triple threat match added should be good. But the stipulation is stupid.
Agreed, Morrison heel turn?
I don't think so. I think this is more of a way to protect Miz so he doesn't tap in 2 straight PPV's. Plus, Raw is already too heel heavy at the top its why Edge hasn't gotten a good storyline since he got the show and why I don't think anyone would be surprised to see him show up on Friday.
Re: WWE: Hell In A Cell
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:41 am
by SpReEfOrAlL
I missed Raw, whats the deal with the triple threat? can anyone fill me in?
Re: WWE: Hell In A Cell
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:44 am
by Stanford
SpReEfOrAlL wrote:I missed Raw, whats the deal with the triple threat? can anyone fill me in?
Submissions count anywhere.
Which is beyond stupid.
Re: WWE: Hell In A Cell
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:55 am
by SpReEfOrAlL
Stanford wrote:SpReEfOrAlL wrote:I missed Raw, whats the deal with the triple threat? can anyone fill me in?
Submissions count anywhere.
Which is beyond stupid.
Lol. That makes no sense. But seeing Morrison and Bryan together will be sick. Morrison deserves the push that the Miz is getting.
Re: WWE: Hell In A Cell
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:32 am
by Jackson 5ive
Does anyone think the "Higher Power" may be Triple H and he comes back to help Wade Barrett beat Cena?
Re: WWE: Hell In A Cell
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 4:18 am
by CapeCrusader
Jackson 5ive wrote:Does anyone think the "Higher Power" may be Triple H and he comes back to help Wade Barrett beat Cena?
What "Higher Power" are you taking about?