WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13

Moderators: Marcus, Stanford

User avatar
jr lucosa
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,048
And1: 1,151
Joined: Jul 11, 2008
       

WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13 

Post#1 » by jr lucosa » Tue Jan 7, 2014 9:04 pm

It's actually rated TV-PG here at least, but sue me, I couldn't think of anything better. :D
CapeCrusader
General Manager
Posts: 7,750
And1: 92
Joined: Nov 07, 2008
Location: Gotham City
Contact:

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13 

Post#2 » by CapeCrusader » Tue Jan 7, 2014 9:47 pm

I like it lol.
B*TCH ! You Weren't With Me Shooting At The Gym!
User avatar
blazza18
RealGM
Posts: 56,366
And1: 29,307
Joined: Dec 02, 2010
       

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13 

Post#3 » by blazza18 » Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:06 pm

Haha yea I like it too.
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 53,571
And1: 18,824
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13 

Post#4 » by Stanford » Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:13 pm

I'm glad you open these. I don't want the responsibility of naming them.

As a little peak into my mind though, I've been listing the 'Top Posters' based on the top three post makers in the TV thread. That's not an incitement to spam, but something to think about ;).
Celtics_Champs
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,596
And1: 8,074
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
Location: TD Garden
 

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13 

Post#5 » by Celtics_Champs » Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:18 pm

What Rumble should I watch tonight? Open to all suggestions except for 1992 and last years.
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 53,571
And1: 18,824
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13 

Post#6 » by Stanford » Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:19 pm

iCooter wrote:What Rumble should I watch tonight? Open to all suggestions except for 1992 and last years.


2004.
Celtics_Champs
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,596
And1: 8,074
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
Location: TD Garden
 

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13 

Post#7 » by Celtics_Champs » Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:23 pm

I actually forget who wins that. I'll probably remember halfway through. But cheers.

2004 wasn't too bad a year for wrestling, I really liked Evolution, it was just littered with Heidenriechs and Snitskys.
User avatar
jr lucosa
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,048
And1: 1,151
Joined: Jul 11, 2008
       

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13 

Post#8 » by jr lucosa » Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:25 pm

Stanford wrote:I'm glad you open these. I don't want the responsibility of naming them.



I already have one for 14, but I was thinking last night as the last one was nearing 100 pages... this could get really hard in the late teens, 20's, etc.
User avatar
kdapiton
RealGM
Posts: 24,994
And1: 7,459
Joined: Jan 09, 2013
Location: Manetheren
 

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13 

Post#9 » by kdapiton » Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:34 pm

Wonder if Batista would look just as roided up as he was before or noticeably skinnier.
we go jim
User avatar
Rich Rane
Senior Mod - Nets
Senior Mod - Nets
Posts: 36,946
And1: 15,613
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
       

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13 

Post#10 » by Rich Rane » Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:37 pm

iCooter wrote:I actually forget who wins that. I'll probably remember halfway through. But cheers.

2004 wasn't too bad a year for wrestling, I really liked Evolution, it was just littered with Heidenriechs and Snitskys.


Snitsky STILL has my award for best Royal Rumble elimination. Paul London sold it amazingly and JR's call was perfect.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUB5L20tlFg[/youtube]
Celtics_Champs
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,596
And1: 8,074
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
Location: TD Garden
 

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13 

Post#11 » by Celtics_Champs » Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:38 pm

kdapiton wrote:Wonder if Batista would look just as roided up as he was before or noticeably skinnier.


Image

That was taken a little bit ago. He's been doing mma stuff last I heard.
Celtics_Champs
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,596
And1: 8,074
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
Location: TD Garden
 

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13 

Post#12 » by Celtics_Champs » Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:38 pm

Rich Rane wrote:
iCooter wrote:I actually forget who wins that. I'll probably remember halfway through. But cheers.

2004 wasn't too bad a year for wrestling, I really liked Evolution, it was just littered with Heidenriechs and Snitskys.


Snitsky STILL has my award for best Royal Rumble elimination. Paul London sold it amazingly and JR's call was perfect.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUB5L20tlFg[/youtube]


I love Paul London.
User avatar
kdapiton
RealGM
Posts: 24,994
And1: 7,459
Joined: Jan 09, 2013
Location: Manetheren
 

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13 

Post#13 » by kdapiton » Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:40 pm

iCooter wrote:
kdapiton wrote:Wonder if Batista would look just as roided up as he was before or noticeably skinnier.


Spoiler:
Image


That was taken a little bit ago. He's been doing mma stuff last I heard.

He doesn't seem to look that jacked here, or maybe it's just me.

It'll be an interesting return.
we go jim
Celtics_Champs
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,596
And1: 8,074
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
Location: TD Garden
 

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13 

Post#14 » by Celtics_Champs » Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:42 pm

no not at all, he lost a ton of weight. Maybe he built himself back up. Where he's doing movies, it wouldn't surprise me if he built himself back up like the rock.
User avatar
Rich Rane
Senior Mod - Nets
Senior Mod - Nets
Posts: 36,946
And1: 15,613
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
       

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13 

Post#15 » by Rich Rane » Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:44 pm

Ziggler diagnosed with concussion:
http://rajah.com/node/38381
User avatar
Stanford
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 53,571
And1: 18,824
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
   

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13 

Post#16 » by Stanford » Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:50 pm

iCooter wrote:I love Paul London.


Same. I think he'd be pretty big in today's WWE.
User avatar
jr lucosa
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,048
And1: 1,151
Joined: Jul 11, 2008
       

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13 

Post#17 » by jr lucosa » Tue Jan 7, 2014 11:04 pm

When Batista was on that Spike TV roundtable with King Mo he did look noticeably smaller, but this pic is from the summer


Spoiler:
Image
skbucks1985
RealGM
Posts: 14,893
And1: 2,025
Joined: Apr 29, 2003

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13 

Post#18 » by skbucks1985 » Tue Jan 7, 2014 11:08 pm

I saw Batista last summer at the Guardians of the Galaxy Comic-Con panel and he didn't look noticeably smaller. Or maybe I have a bad memory of how he looked at the end of his WWE run (a very distinct possibility.)
User avatar
jr lucosa
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,048
And1: 1,151
Joined: Jul 11, 2008
       

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13 

Post#19 » by jr lucosa » Tue Jan 7, 2014 11:08 pm

Stanford wrote:
iCooter wrote:I love Paul London.


Same. I think he'd be pretty big in today's WWE.


I don't know if he would be or not, but I would like to see him back either way.
skbucks1985
RealGM
Posts: 14,893
And1: 2,025
Joined: Apr 29, 2003

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13 

Post#20 » by skbucks1985 » Tue Jan 7, 2014 11:20 pm

So I re-watched the Reigns-Punk match. Two things are pretty clear, Reigns has a very, very bright future but also that he's still pretty green. Watching that match closely you could see Punk carrying him and leading him for most of that match. At this point, putting him in a singles match with someone other than 4-5 guys could yield pretty bad results. If they're committed to the Reigns as the breakout singles star of The Shield I think they should put off there breakup for a while and maybe do that babyface run that some are clamoring for.

Having said that, I don't think Cena or Batista or Rock were quite ready in terms of ring work for a top singles run when they got it. But all of those turned out pretty well.

Return to Pro Wrestling