Page 1 of 75

WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13

Posted: Tue Jan 7, 2014 9:04 pm
by jr lucosa
It's actually rated TV-PG here at least, but sue me, I couldn't think of anything better. :D

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13

Posted: Tue Jan 7, 2014 9:47 pm
by CapeCrusader
I like it lol.

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13

Posted: Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:06 pm
by blazza18
Haha yea I like it too.

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13

Posted: Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:13 pm
by Stanford
I'm glad you open these. I don't want the responsibility of naming them.

As a little peak into my mind though, I've been listing the 'Top Posters' based on the top three post makers in the TV thread. That's not an incitement to spam, but something to think about ;).

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13

Posted: Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:18 pm
by Celtics_Champs
What Rumble should I watch tonight? Open to all suggestions except for 1992 and last years.

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13

Posted: Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:19 pm
by Stanford
iCooter wrote:What Rumble should I watch tonight? Open to all suggestions except for 1992 and last years.


2004.

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13

Posted: Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:23 pm
by Celtics_Champs
I actually forget who wins that. I'll probably remember halfway through. But cheers.

2004 wasn't too bad a year for wrestling, I really liked Evolution, it was just littered with Heidenriechs and Snitskys.

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13

Posted: Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:25 pm
by jr lucosa
Stanford wrote:I'm glad you open these. I don't want the responsibility of naming them.



I already have one for 14, but I was thinking last night as the last one was nearing 100 pages... this could get really hard in the late teens, 20's, etc.

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13

Posted: Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:34 pm
by kdapiton
Wonder if Batista would look just as roided up as he was before or noticeably skinnier.

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13

Posted: Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:37 pm
by Rich Rane
iCooter wrote:I actually forget who wins that. I'll probably remember halfway through. But cheers.

2004 wasn't too bad a year for wrestling, I really liked Evolution, it was just littered with Heidenriechs and Snitskys.


Snitsky STILL has my award for best Royal Rumble elimination. Paul London sold it amazingly and JR's call was perfect.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUB5L20tlFg[/youtube]

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13

Posted: Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:38 pm
by Celtics_Champs
kdapiton wrote:Wonder if Batista would look just as roided up as he was before or noticeably skinnier.


Image

That was taken a little bit ago. He's been doing mma stuff last I heard.

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13

Posted: Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:38 pm
by Celtics_Champs
Rich Rane wrote:
iCooter wrote:I actually forget who wins that. I'll probably remember halfway through. But cheers.

2004 wasn't too bad a year for wrestling, I really liked Evolution, it was just littered with Heidenriechs and Snitskys.


Snitsky STILL has my award for best Royal Rumble elimination. Paul London sold it amazingly and JR's call was perfect.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUB5L20tlFg[/youtube]


I love Paul London.

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13

Posted: Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:40 pm
by kdapiton
iCooter wrote:
kdapiton wrote:Wonder if Batista would look just as roided up as he was before or noticeably skinnier.


Spoiler:
Image


That was taken a little bit ago. He's been doing mma stuff last I heard.

He doesn't seem to look that jacked here, or maybe it's just me.

It'll be an interesting return.

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13

Posted: Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:42 pm
by Celtics_Champs
no not at all, he lost a ton of weight. Maybe he built himself back up. Where he's doing movies, it wouldn't surprise me if he built himself back up like the rock.

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13

Posted: Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:44 pm
by Rich Rane
Ziggler diagnosed with concussion:
http://rajah.com/node/38381

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13

Posted: Tue Jan 7, 2014 10:50 pm
by Stanford
iCooter wrote:I love Paul London.


Same. I think he'd be pretty big in today's WWE.

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13

Posted: Tue Jan 7, 2014 11:04 pm
by jr lucosa
When Batista was on that Spike TV roundtable with King Mo he did look noticeably smaller, but this pic is from the summer


Spoiler:
Image

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13

Posted: Tue Jan 7, 2014 11:08 pm
by skbucks1985
I saw Batista last summer at the Guardians of the Galaxy Comic-Con panel and he didn't look noticeably smaller. Or maybe I have a bad memory of how he looked at the end of his WWE run (a very distinct possibility.)

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13

Posted: Tue Jan 7, 2014 11:08 pm
by jr lucosa
Stanford wrote:
iCooter wrote:I love Paul London.


Same. I think he'd be pretty big in today's WWE.


I don't know if he would be or not, but I would like to see him back either way.

Re: WWE TV Thread: Rated PG-13

Posted: Tue Jan 7, 2014 11:20 pm
by skbucks1985
So I re-watched the Reigns-Punk match. Two things are pretty clear, Reigns has a very, very bright future but also that he's still pretty green. Watching that match closely you could see Punk carrying him and leading him for most of that match. At this point, putting him in a singles match with someone other than 4-5 guys could yield pretty bad results. If they're committed to the Reigns as the breakout singles star of The Shield I think they should put off there breakup for a while and maybe do that babyface run that some are clamoring for.

Having said that, I don't think Cena or Batista or Rock were quite ready in terms of ring work for a top singles run when they got it. But all of those turned out pretty well.