WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,997
- And1: 7,275
- Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
People are speculating that wwe is now inserting crowd noise into their live shows.
Just sad if that’s true. That some Trump administration level stuff right there.
Just sad if that’s true. That some Trump administration level stuff right there.
Do it for Chuck
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- Stanford
- Forum Mod
- Posts: 52,169
- And1: 16,865
- Joined: Feb 07, 2005
- Location: Parts Unknown
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
I'm going to start pumping fake posts into this thread
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,521
- And1: 4,405
- Joined: May 23, 2014
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
jakecronus8 wrote:People are speculating that wwe is now inserting crowd noise into their live shows.
Just sad if that’s true. That some Drumpf administration level stuff right there.
I mean, they've been editing negative crowd reactions for years, especially when Roman Reigns was involved, so not sure why anyone would be surprised by this.
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- LLJ
- RealGM
- Posts: 53,104
- And1: 17,215
- Joined: Jul 10, 2003
- Location: Unfixed
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Really? WWE main roster crowds still look and sound as dead as ever to me
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,521
- And1: 4,405
- Joined: May 23, 2014
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
LLJ wrote:Really? WWE main roster crowds still look and sound as dead as ever to me
I haven't watched Raw or Smackdown in forever, so I was just going off of previous posts. No idea if they're actually doing it, but I don't think it would be at all surprising given their history of editing crowd reactions.
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,054
- And1: 903
- Joined: Jul 01, 2014
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
The wrestling is on point, but the storylines are pretty pathetic to be fair.
West-Flemish for behinners:
- - Dust means thirsty.
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,997
- And1: 7,275
- Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
improper wrote:jakecronus8 wrote:People are speculating that wwe is now inserting crowd noise into their live shows.
Just sad if that’s true. That some Drumpf administration level stuff right there.
I mean, they've been editing negative crowd reactions for years, especially when Roman Reigns was involved, so not sure why anyone would be surprised by this.
Muting the crowd is one thing. Adding fake noise in to support your own heel/face booking seems cheap/weak even by Vince standards.
Do it for Chuck
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- iMoreland
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,443
- And1: 2,946
- Joined: Jan 23, 2014
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Shinsuke (c) vs Strowman tonight. They have to out the title on Strowman right? Shinsuke has been IC champ for 200 days and defended it 3 times.
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- tugs
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,633
- And1: 2,926
- Joined: Jul 22, 2010
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Aaaaaand it happened. Interesting where the stable will go from here. But I don't think the feud is over.
Main event is stupidly entertaining. Roman was enjoying that dog food segment, you really can tell
Main event is stupidly entertaining. Roman was enjoying that dog food segment, you really can tell
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,997
- And1: 7,275
- Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
That Miz/Morrison ‘Once Upon a Time in Hollwood’ segment was one of the best things I’ve seen in years. Truly tremendous stuff.
Of course new day has to come out and immediately bore me but nonetheless, great stuff.
Of course new day has to come out and immediately bore me but nonetheless, great stuff.
Do it for Chuck
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,054
- And1: 903
- Joined: Jul 01, 2014
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
The Dirt Sheet was great stuff.
Goldberg vs The Fiend. I just want Goldberg to bounce of The Fiend when he spears him.
Goldberg vs The Fiend. I just want Goldberg to bounce of The Fiend when he spears him.
West-Flemish for behinners:
- - Dust means thirsty.
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- tugs
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,633
- And1: 2,926
- Joined: Jul 22, 2010
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Best part of the New Day promo were the dudes getting popcorns from Big E's bucket!jakecronus8 wrote:That Miz/Morrison ‘Once Upon a Time in Hollwood’ segment was one of the best things I’ve seen in years. Truly tremendous stuff.
Of course new day has to come out and immediately bore me but nonetheless, great stuff.
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- WRau1
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,925
- And1: 5,144
- Joined: Apr 30, 2005
- Location: Milwaukee
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Meltzer is speculating that Goldberg will go over at Super Showdown because Goldberg vs Reigns at Mania will draw more interest. That would be hilarious having two part time wrestlers as your main title holders. Only in the WWE...
#FreeChuckDiesel
#FreeNowak008
#FreeNewz
#FreeNowak008
#FreeNewz
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 47,909
- And1: 11,579
- Joined: Jul 17, 2001
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
The_Brecht wrote:The Dirt Sheet was great stuff.
Goldberg vs The Fiend. I just want Goldberg to bounce of The Fiend when he spears him.
A match with no selling - interesting. Then again, Golberg's likely to accidentally injure The Fiend or himself.
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,054
- And1: 903
- Joined: Jul 01, 2014
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Ruzious wrote:The_Brecht wrote:The Dirt Sheet was great stuff.
Goldberg vs The Fiend. I just want Goldberg to bounce of The Fiend when he spears him.
A match with no selling - interesting. Then again, Golberg's likely to accidentally injure The Fiend or himself.
It's an interesting choice they made. I don't get it really and I have low expectations for the fued and match.
West-Flemish for behinners:
- - Dust means thirsty.
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,521
- And1: 4,405
- Joined: May 23, 2014
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
WRau1 wrote:Meltzer is speculating that Goldberg will go over at Super Showdown because Goldberg vs Reigns at Mania will draw more interest. That would be hilarious having two part time wrestlers as your main title holders. Only in the WWE...
If nothing else it will be fun watching the fans crap all over that match.
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,054
- And1: 903
- Joined: Jul 01, 2014
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
WRau1 wrote:Meltzer is speculating that Goldberg will go over at Super Showdown because Goldberg vs Reigns at Mania will draw more interest. That would be hilarious having two part time wrestlers as your main title holders. Only in the WWE...
That would be the stupidest decision ever.
So it could really happen...
West-Flemish for behinners:
- - Dust means thirsty.
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,636
- And1: 3,038
- Joined: May 27, 2004
- Location: Masalaland
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
The_Brecht wrote:WRau1 wrote:Meltzer is speculating that Goldberg will go over at Super Showdown because Goldberg vs Reigns at Mania will draw more interest. That would be hilarious having two part time wrestlers as your main title holders. Only in the WWE...
That would be the stupidest decision ever.
So it could really happen...
I cant imagine that would be the case, build up the Fiend just to feed him to Goldberg. Unless the want to ensure a Reigns pinfall gets cheers, I guess him beating Goldberg would be more popular than beating Bray
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
- tugs
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,633
- And1: 2,926
- Joined: Jul 22, 2010
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
They can go that route like The Fiend suddenly turning to Funhouse Bray pre match and gets surprised with Spears
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,997
- And1: 7,275
- Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Re: WWE SmackDown Discussion II
Only thing I’d semi enjoy would be that idea someone had where taker costs fiend the match and fiend properly retires taker at mania in a squash
Do it for Chuck