WWE General Discussion II
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2018 5:52 pm
I think Ricochet is like a cross between Rey Mysterio and the Undertaker.
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=273&t=1718727
Ruzious wrote:he went up against a bunch of pretty bad prospects and lost somewhere in the middle. He looked like he had talent, but he sounded like an ass and obviously didn't shine enough anywhere to stay in the competition. When I see him, I remember a loser from that competition.
Stanford wrote:Ruzious wrote:he went up against a bunch of pretty bad prospects and lost somewhere in the middle. He looked like he had talent, but he sounded like an ass and obviously didn't shine enough anywhere to stay in the competition. When I see him, I remember a loser from that competition.
Merit isn't considered when deciding the winner of Tough Enough. The two winners of that season didn't have a single televised NXT match while the losers are thriving.
He didn't lose because he was bad. Everyone knew he was the best.
Ruzious wrote:Stanford wrote:Ruzious wrote:he went up against a bunch of pretty bad prospects and lost somewhere in the middle. He looked like he had talent, but he sounded like an ass and obviously didn't shine enough anywhere to stay in the competition. When I see him, I remember a loser from that competition.
Merit isn't considered when deciding the winner of Tough Enough. The two winners of that season didn't have a single televised NXT match while the losers are thriving.
He didn't lose because he was bad. Everyone knew he was the best.
Doesn't really matter - he got eliminated for reasons over a period of time - presumably valid, and now people here just 3 years later are calling him the best young pro wrestler in the business. If you have different standards - that's fine. For me, it doesn't compute - at all.
Stanford wrote:Ruzious wrote:Stanford wrote:
Merit isn't considered when deciding the winner of Tough Enough. The two winners of that season didn't have a single televised NXT match while the losers are thriving.
He didn't lose because he was bad. Everyone knew he was the best.
Doesn't really matter - he got eliminated for reasons over a period of time - presumably valid, and now people here just 3 years later are calling him the best young pro wrestler in the business. If you have different standards - that's fine. For me, it doesn't compute - at all.
He got eliminated by an online fan vote, which the coaches strongly disagreed with.
If you have different standards, that's fine.
spykelee wrote:That show represents a missed opportunity and nothing more. Mandy rose and Sonya deville were both voted off from that season and have since made the main roster. Does that make them better prospects than VD?
Stanford wrote:I think Mandy and Sonya are on their way to being good wrestlers.
Ruzious wrote:Stanford wrote:Ruzious wrote:he went up against a bunch of pretty bad prospects and lost somewhere in the middle. He looked like he had talent, but he sounded like an ass and obviously didn't shine enough anywhere to stay in the competition. When I see him, I remember a loser from that competition.
Merit isn't considered when deciding the winner of Tough Enough. The two winners of that season didn't have a single televised NXT match while the losers are thriving.
He didn't lose because he was bad. Everyone knew he was the best.
Doesn't really matter - he got eliminated for reasons over a period of time - presumably valid, and now people here just 3 years later are calling him the best young pro wrestler in the business. If you have different standards - that's fine. For me, it doesn't compute - at all.
improper wrote:spykelee wrote:That show represents a missed opportunity and nothing more. Mandy rose and Sonya deville were both voted off from that season and have since made the main roster. Does that make them better prospects than VD?
Nope, just shows how devoid of talent the women's division is on the main roster. Got about six to eight girls who know how to work and the rest are just Diva-era crap.
I feel like male main roster prospects have to demonstrate the ability to be incredibly good at something. Owens was great in the ring and on the mic, even if his look isn't great. Zayn was an elite worker with a good character (his awesome heel work has proven how great he is on the mic, at least before he went to Raw...guessing that's a Vince issue) and a solid look. AJ Styles came in as one of the best workers in the world, probably the most famous non-WWE wrestler, and improved a great deal on the mic. The list goes on.
Female prospects basically just have to demonstrate the ability to walk and chew gum and look good while doing it. That's enough for Vince. Or if you're related to Rock, I guess you get pushed too. I'd include Flair in that too, but Charlotte at least deserved her push, even if they shouldn't have had her beat Asuka only to job to Carmella.
Dominater wrote:Ruzious wrote:Stanford wrote:
Merit isn't considered when deciding the winner of Tough Enough. The two winners of that season didn't have a single televised NXT match while the losers are thriving.
He didn't lose because he was bad. Everyone knew he was the best.
Doesn't really matter - he got eliminated for reasons over a period of time - presumably valid, and now people here just 3 years later are calling him the best young pro wrestler in the business. If you have different standards - that's fine. For me, it doesn't compute - at all.
If we're going by that standard, then do you still see Dolph Ziggler as a cheerleader?
LLJ wrote:Yet he still keeps pushing DE BLONDES.
Stanford wrote:LLJ wrote:Yet he still keeps pushing DE BLONDES.
That's all you see Alexa as?
LLJ wrote:But if she were black, brunette or anything other than a hot blonde, would she would get the same push?
Stanford wrote:LLJ wrote:But if she were black, brunette or anything other than a hot blonde, would she would get the same push?
Yes.
LLJ wrote:Funny thing: I heard Vince's favorite female wrestler of all time was actually AJ Lee because she was "different" from the cookie cutter types. Yet he still keeps pushing DE BLONDES.
I don't think Vince cares as much about in-ring ability as he should. I heard he only fell for AJ Lee when he saw her character and mic work. It wasn't the fact that she was a half-decent worker that impressed him, though he probably would have used it to bolster any argument if he were asked.
I'm going to guess the major reason Asuka keeps hanging around the title picture and being put in major angles still is probably because of her look and charisma rather than her wrestling ability.
Stanford wrote:LLJ wrote:But if she were black, brunette or anything other than a hot blonde, would she would get the same push?
Yes.
improper wrote:
Come on, man. You don't honestly believe that.
Maybe if she was brunette. But if she were black or Asian? No chance she gets booked as dominantly as Alexa has been.
Hell, we literally saw what Vince has done with Asuka, an attractive Asian woman who is probably the most dominant female performer the WWE has ever had outside of Chyna, who looked like a dude. It took like a month and a half for Vince to turn her into a forgettable joke.