Jack on 1080 the FAN:primetime at 5:25pm PST

Post #1 » by **Mr Odd** » Mon Mar 3, 2008 11:26 pm

Jack will be on 1080 the FAN:Primetime at 5:25pm PST. (radio)
Or you can goto channel #37 on Comcast. (tv)

Might be interesting.

Post #2 » by **Mr Odd** » Tue Mar 4, 2008 5:31 am

Jack has his own mini show just like Frye now.

Frye comes on at 5:25pm PST every Thu.
Jack comes on at 5:25pm PST every Mon.

Jack was REALLY funny. If he could play
as good as he is funny then he'd be great!!

Jack was baggin Frye big time. Jack said that
Frye listens to Good Vibrations by the Beach
Boys and Girls Just Wanna Have Fun by Cyndi
Lauper before every game on his MP3 player.
Then Jack said he got that info from Raef.. .
LOL

To sum up what Jack said is that he doesnt
pay attention to trade talk and that he feels
he can be a starting PG but if the Blazers
feel he should come off the bench he will
have no problem with that aslong as the
team is heading in the right direction, also
that he likes being a Blazer & hope he stays.
-

Personally my feeling is that as long as Jack
is on the team it could hamper other players
growth because hes kind of Nates teachers pet.
If Nate wasnt like that then I would probably
want Jack to stay to come off the bench.. .

Klinky · Post #3 » by **Klinky** » Tue Mar 4, 2008 6:58 pm

Do you think that Nate keeps playing Jack because he really likes Jack or do you think it's some sort of mental blackmail that Jack pulls where he'll whimper & whine or get down in the dumps?

d-train · Post #4 » by **d-train** » Tue Mar 4, 2008 7:21 pm

Klinky wrote:Do you think that Nate keeps playing Jack because he really likes Jack or do you think it's some sort of mental blackmail that Jack pulls where he'll whimper & whine or get down in the dumps?

I think Nate keeps playing Jack because he is one of our 5 best players.

UGotThrilled · Post #5 » by **UGotThrilled** » Tue Mar 4, 2008 9:11 pm

I think Jack still gets more time than his inconsistency warrants because he can always be counted on to play hard and have a lot of intensity. Like everybody else, I get frustrated with his incosistency and think that we could upgrade from him, but there is no denying that the guy plays with a lot of passion and intensity.

d-train · Post #6 » by **d-train** » Tue Mar 4, 2008 9:25 pm

UGotThrilled wrote:I think Jack still gets more time than his inconsistency warrants because he can always be counted on to play hard and have a lot of intensity. Like everybody else, I get frustrated with his incosistency and think that we could upgrade from him, but there is no denying that the guy plays with a lot of passion and intensity.

So, Nate can count on Jack to play hard and compete but the results of his hard work aren't always the most desired result. That might not be ideal but its better than going with a guy who's effort isn't consistently there.

Post #7 » by **Mr Odd** » Wed Mar 5, 2008 11:52 pm

d-train wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

I think Nate keeps playing Jack because he is one of our 5 best players.

Roy
LMA
Travis
Blake
Joel
Jones