ImageImage

Blazers VS. Kings

Moderators: Moonbeam, DeBlazerRiddem

User avatar
Fitz303
General Manager
Posts: 8,198
And1: 1,839
Joined: Oct 18, 2006
Location: Portland

 

Post#21 » by Fitz303 » Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:00 am

Man the game threads are getting lame these days.. nobody in here.. pretty awful game overall so far
User avatar
jeffhardyfan52
General Manager
Posts: 9,894
And1: 596
Joined: Jul 09, 2006
Location: Portland
Contact:
       

 

Post#22 » by jeffhardyfan52 » Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:08 am

its cuz everyones in the chatrooom
He’s not (my-vydas), he’s not (your-vydas), he’s Arvydas

Image
User avatar
d-train
RealGM
Posts: 21,227
And1: 1,098
Joined: Mar 26, 2001
   

 

Post#23 » by d-train » Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:16 am

Did anyone see the play earlier when Udrih owned Roy? Roy's defense wasn't horrible but it was a good example of how nobody can guard a NBA player without good help defense. Udrih had a lot of dribbles before he walked around Roy and there was no help.
Image
TradeMachine
Banned User
Posts: 3,301
And1: 3
Joined: May 25, 2007
Location: Birthplace of the future dyansty.

 

Post#24 » by TradeMachine » Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:18 am

Good God. I think I hate Jarrett Jack. Trade his ass already.
User avatar
b_roy7
Veteran
Posts: 2,908
And1: 0
Joined: May 11, 2007
Contact:

 

Post#25 » by b_roy7 » Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:30 am

Fitz303 wrote:Man the game threads are getting lame these days.. nobody in here.. pretty awful game overall so far
True that. C'mon guys, look at it as a positive. We get a worse record than Sacramento, we get a better chance to draft Rose! :D

Didn't get to see much of the game, but what I saw was bad.
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,117
And1: 3,094
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

 

Post#26 » by PDXKnight » Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:36 am

According to wheels, the kings were only 1-22 in games that they scored less than 100. Last time it was the kings only winning 1 game on the road vs the west and they beat us at home. Needless to say, the kings bring out the worst in the Blazers.
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,218
And1: 7,979
Joined: May 28, 2007

 

Post#27 » by Wizenheimer » Fri Mar 14, 2008 5:08 am

two games on the road trip when portland shoots less then 40% and it's the 2 losses. Sometimes it's that simple.

of course the ultra-sloppy ballhandling made this game ugly for the blazers. Brandon, LMA and Blakey combined for 14 turnovers...Yikes!
The Sebastian Express
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,387
And1: 11,559
Joined: Dec 10, 2004

 

Post#28 » by The Sebastian Express » Fri Mar 14, 2008 5:40 am

Yeah, high turnover numbers for Brandon and LMA. Very unusual. Expected a loss when we had four turnovers in the first five possessions.
pr0nny
Senior
Posts: 541
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 24, 2005

 

Post#29 » by pr0nny » Fri Mar 14, 2008 6:22 am

It's almost hilarious how awful we are sometimes.

sigh.
User avatar
BlackMamba
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,297
And1: 81
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Location: Cd. de M
         

 

Post#30 » by BlackMamba » Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:02 pm

well, good to see aldridge scoring is still in the 20pts, plys roy again having a "good" game (both had 11 TOs!!!!).

i don't know, i didn't watch the game, but i could think that fouls won the game for the kings? both joel and aldridge with 5.
User avatar
breaker91
Starter
Posts: 2,125
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 07, 2007
Location: Portland, where meniscus tears happen

 

Post#31 » by breaker91 » Fri Mar 14, 2008 4:50 pm

Jack made the night's worst in ESPN's daily dime, even though he had no TOs last night, but wow 1-18 in his last three games is pretty awful.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/dailydime ... ime-080314
User avatar
Mr Odd
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,081
And1: 8
Joined: Jul 08, 2003

 

Post#32 » by Mr Odd » Fri Mar 14, 2008 11:15 pm

pr0nny wrote:It's almost hilarious how awful we are sometimes.

sigh.


When the jumpers arent going in the Blazers do bad
and thats because there is no offensive system in
place. The teams defense is usually consistent,
but again, when the jumpers arent going in
the Blazers cant score & it makes for a
long night.. .Nate really didnt have a
system in Seattle either. It was
basically his two all-stars that
made up for the offense.. .
Hopefully Pritchard can
get some players to
help fix this!!!!!!!!
Image
bing'o-bang'o-bong'o-baby!!
User avatar
Fitz303
General Manager
Posts: 8,198
And1: 1,839
Joined: Oct 18, 2006
Location: Portland

 

Post#33 » by Fitz303 » Sat Mar 15, 2008 1:27 am

I actually didnt even realize you were ripping on Nate until I went through and read it again because my brain couldnt firugre out what in the hell you were doing with your paragraph. My head almost blew up while reading that
User avatar
Mr Odd
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,081
And1: 8
Joined: Jul 08, 2003

 

Post#34 » by Mr Odd » Sat Mar 15, 2008 2:41 am

Fitz303 wrote:I actually didnt even realize you were ripping on Nate until I went through and read it again because my brain couldnt firugre out what in the hell you were doing with your paragraph. My head almost blew up while reading that


Haha!! Thats clasic.. . :lol:

Also I wasnt exactly trying to rip Nate
but I can see how it looks that way.. .
Plus the fact that I always point out
things that he does that I dont like, lol.

I just think offense isnt one of Nates
good points in his coaching. He has
gotten better tho since taking over
with his lineups outside of playing
Jack & even lately thats been getting
better. Its just when I watch other
teams, the majority of them do so
much more to get easier buckets
then the Blazers. Now I know some
of that has to do with the Blazers
being young, but even in Nates
coaching Seattle days the offense
was basically screens for his two
all-stars which was their offensive
system.. .Anyway, ill shut up!!
Image
bing'o-bang'o-bong'o-baby!!

Return to Portland Trail Blazers