ImageImage

The Nuggets score 168 pts vs the Sonics

Moderators: Moonbeam, DeBlazerRiddem

taufblazers33
Starter
Posts: 2,356
And1: 654
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Chicago
   

The Nuggets score 168 pts vs the Sonics 

Post#1 » by taufblazers33 » Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:51 am

..speaking of defense...
TBpup
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,907
And1: 247
Joined: Jan 07, 2004
Location: Financial Planning office in L.O.
       

 

Post#2 » by TBpup » Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:56 am

OK....who on the Sonics thought they would score 116 points....and lose by 52! Denver had seven players with 17+ points...insane. 44 assists? Holy cow..and only one player (Najera) shot under 50%.

Shades of Issel/Enlish/Vandeweghe.


:starwars
@TBpup22
User avatar
mojomarc
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,838
And1: 999
Joined: Jun 01, 2004
Location: Funkytown

 

Post#3 » by mojomarc » Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:59 am

What's even more amazing is that Denver's averaging 142ppg against the Sonics this season.
User avatar
Mr Odd
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,081
And1: 8
Joined: Jul 08, 2003

 

Post#4 » by Mr Odd » Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:59 am

AHH VIDEO GAMES ARE REAL!!
Image
bing'o-bang'o-bong'o-baby!!
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,117
And1: 3,094
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

 

Post#5 » by PDXKnight » Mon Mar 17, 2008 6:24 am

It's the sonics, I'm shocked they didn't score 200 on them. Seattle's defense has been absolutely atrocious ever since they got rid of Kurt Thomas (it's hard to believe that it actually got worse). This was a nice game on Denver's part though and I definitely give them a lot of credit for how well they played tonight. They led a very balanced offensive attack and were able to catch Seattle by surprise. :lol:
MrCavs
Sophomore
Posts: 160
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia

 

Post#6 » by MrCavs » Mon Mar 17, 2008 9:31 am

no.....no suprise there as soon as Minny beat them the other day...its time to start tanking for that special #2 Pick....And who wouldnt have traded Kurt Thomas for a future 1st Rounder??
User avatar
PhilipNelsonFan
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 17,246
And1: 6
Joined: Oct 11, 2004

 

Post#7 » by PhilipNelsonFan » Mon Mar 17, 2008 9:51 am

Seattle may be bad, but did you see Denver's shooting percentages? 60% FG and 50% 3PT. That was basically everything breaking right for Denver, and when that happens...look out.

Obviously a flukish game but a lot of fun to see big numbers in the boxscore. Still makes me hate the Nuggets though.
Tim Lehrbach wrote:I will break the Rose Garden.
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,117
And1: 3,094
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

 

Post#8 » by PDXKnight » Mon Mar 17, 2008 8:09 pm

MrCavs wrote:no.....no suprise there as soon as Minny beat them the other day...its time to start tanking for that special #2 Pick....And who wouldnt have traded Kurt Thomas for a future 1st Rounder??


I didn't say the trade was bad for Seattle, I was just saying Seattle's defense got worse following the trade.
User avatar
swede
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,771
And1: 6
Joined: Oct 18, 2005
Location: Z-Bo: Cuz the NBA aint got Roger Goodell.

 

Post#9 » by swede » Mon Mar 17, 2008 8:20 pm

Seattle is going to be scary. They have so many fkn first round picks. PLZ take 3 project centers in the near future :)
Cyborg21 wrote:Screw you Batum, throwing us under the bus, I hope we destroy these scum next year.
User avatar
mojomarc
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,838
And1: 999
Joined: Jun 01, 2004
Location: Funkytown

 

Post#10 » by mojomarc » Tue Mar 18, 2008 3:30 am

Just think--one more point and Denver would have matched what the Philadelphia Warriors scored the night Wilt Chamberlain got 100 all by himself.

Return to Portland Trail Blazers