ImageImage

Game Thread: Suns vs Blazers Redux! 7.30pm

Moderators: Moonbeam, DeBlazerRiddem

TBpup
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,907
And1: 247
Joined: Jan 07, 2004
Location: Financial Planning office in L.O.
       

 

Post#21 » by TBpup » Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:28 am

PS, have I mentioned how much I hate Jack?


TradeMachine....he was only -14 on the plus/minus ratio. :P

:starwars
@TBpup22
TradeMachine
Banned User
Posts: 3,301
And1: 3
Joined: May 25, 2007
Location: Birthplace of the future dyansty.

 

Post#22 » by TradeMachine » Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:33 am

TBpup wrote:
PS, have I mentioned how much I hate Jack?


TradeMachine....he was only -14 on the plus/minus ratio. :P

:starwars


He didn't really cost us the game tonight, but I'm tired of his boneheaded plays. It's getting comical nowadays.

Rudy has nothing to worry about in regards to PT. He doesn't really need to be too good to take Jack's time.
User avatar
Yadadimean
Analyst
Posts: 3,407
And1: 76
Joined: Mar 02, 2006
Location: Oakland

 

Post#23 » by Yadadimean » Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:35 am

TradeMachine wrote:I don't think I've ever seen Roy have as bad a game as he had tonight. meh, he'll bounce back.

PS, have I mentioned how much I hate Jack?


very off shooting night for roy but the rest of his game showed up at least and lma keeps showing how good he is gonna be.
User avatar
Yadadimean
Analyst
Posts: 3,407
And1: 76
Joined: Mar 02, 2006
Location: Oakland

 

Post#24 » by Yadadimean » Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:37 am

TradeMachine wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



He didn't really cost us the game tonight, but I'm tired of his boneheaded plays. It's getting comical nowadays.

Rudy has nothing to worry about in regards to PT. He doesn't really need to be too good to take Jack's time.


either way i refuse to change my avatar cause it took me like 6 years to figure out how to put this one on
User avatar
Effigy
RealGM
Posts: 14,527
And1: 13,784
Joined: Nov 27, 2001
     

 

Post#25 » by Effigy » Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:40 am

I didn't get to see the game, did LMA cover Amare?

From a look at the box score the one bright spot for us was that LMA outperformed Amare. Shot better, scored more and rebounded slightly better. Amare went to the line way way more than LMA which is the only thing that put his points up to as high as they were.
User avatar
mojomarc
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,838
And1: 999
Joined: Jun 01, 2004
Location: Funkytown

 

Post#26 » by mojomarc » Wed Mar 19, 2008 10:24 am

I liked the way we fought in the first half, hated the way we rolled over and died in the second.
taufblazers33
Starter
Posts: 2,356
And1: 654
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Chicago
   

 

Post#27 » by taufblazers33 » Wed Mar 19, 2008 11:48 am

Yadadimean wrote:


either way i refuse to change my avatar cause it took me like 6 years to figure out how to put this one on

:rofl: :rofl: :bowdown: :bowdown: :rofl: :rofl:
User avatar
BlackMamba
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,297
And1: 81
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Location: Cd. de M
         

 

Post#28 » by BlackMamba » Wed Mar 19, 2008 2:24 pm

well, it wasn't that bad of a game for the blazers. of course roy had a pretty bad game and that maybe was the cause for the blazers loss.

and what's with webster only taking 3 shots? i know aldridge was having a good game, so he took a LOT of shots, but still, there is no clear 3rd option.

and yes, joel should stay as a blazer until the day he retires. he is going to be the perfect compliment for oden.

Return to Portland Trail Blazers