mojomarc wrote:As we know, it's not that easy. Players play for coaches who dictate who plays and the style that is played. Rudy's expression of concern is nothing more or less than the expressions of concern that committed players at the college level have when coaches leave for other jobs, and the NCAA recognizes it as a reasonable enough concern that they have one of the very few exceptions to the commitment without sacrificing eligibility.
The suggestion was that this is "lack of confidence in ability" is simply silly. I'm perfectly confident in my professional abilities, but that hardly means that I would accept any job offer that came across my desk without investigating how accepting that job might affect my professional future. My concern about this hardly makes me a bad employee, which is where this argument started in Rudy's case. He is looking at a situation where he is being asked to take a big risk both in terms of pay and in terms of culture, and we're piling on the risk of a coach that does seem to lack method in his madness (your argument that I know less than Nate doesn't hold water since Rudy also knows less than Nate, but he has to make decisions based on his imperfect information), and for us to not only be shocked by him looking at this piling on of risk with concern but to be offended by it, to suggest that somehow this makes him a bad piece for the team?
The career path choice a young man makes is never easy but there are elements of every decision that are easy. There are elements of Rudy's career path choice that are easy. It is easy to know that for a basketball player the NBA is the ultimate testing ground of your abilities. The only place a pro basketball player can reach the pinnacle of his profession is in the NBA. It is also easy to know that
_IF_ your talent is great enough the NBA is the most financially rewarding place to play basketball. The question about the financial rewards however is quite the landmine field. It is a landmine field because if your talent is not great enough the place to find the greatest financial rewards may very well not be the NBA. To succeed financially in the NBA your talents have to be extremely great or you need a rare combination of great talent and an understanding of how to use your talent to help a team succeed.
The decision Rudy is confronted with is all about his confidence in his ability and his priorities. If Rudy is worried that his ability is not great enough to overcome the challenges of the NBA, or if reaching the pinnacle of his profession isn't a high priority, he shouldn't risk his local opportunities to try the NBA. Even if Rudy is confident his abilities are great enough, he should consider there have been many people before him in his same situation and most of them were not great enough even though they thought they were.
The thing about this discussion that is silly and ludicrous Mojo is your insistence to interject Nate into it. Every basketball team has a coach and if Nate is as incompetent as you believe he will not keep his job. Actually, if Nate is as incompetent as you believe it