ImageImage

Portland and recently waived players

Moderators: DeBlazerRiddem, Moonbeam

realboredcactus
Ballboy
Posts: 36
And1: 3
Joined: Jul 01, 2019
   

Re: Portland and recently waived players 

Post#21 » by realboredcactus » Wed Jul 17, 2019 11:52 am

DusterBuster wrote:
realboredcactus wrote:CHRISTIAN WOOD IS A FREE AGENT. NEIL. GET THIS MAN


He's worth a flyer imo.


I def overrate him, but can we really do better for a 14th/15th man?
Renegade
Sophomore
Posts: 145
And1: 21
Joined: Jun 16, 2008
 

Re: Portland and recently waived players 

Post#22 » by Renegade » Wed Jul 17, 2019 1:53 pm

realboredcactus wrote:
DusterBuster wrote:
realboredcactus wrote:CHRISTIAN WOOD IS A FREE AGENT. NEIL. GET THIS MAN


He's worth a flyer imo.


I def overrate him, but can we really do better for a 14th/15th man?


Perhaps the better question would be should the Blazers pay (salary + tax) a guy whose only playing time will be practice? For him to get real game time would require an injury ... probably several of them.

It might be wiser to leave the spot for a released player that might add something in minimal minutes.
User avatar
d-train
RealGM
Posts: 21,227
And1: 1,098
Joined: Mar 26, 2001
   

Re: Portland and recently waived players 

Post#23 » by d-train » Wed Jul 17, 2019 3:58 pm

Renegade wrote:
realboredcactus wrote:
DusterBuster wrote:
He's worth a flyer imo.


I def overrate him, but can we really do better for a 14th/15th man?


Perhaps the better question would be should the Blazers pay (salary + tax) a guy whose only playing time will be practice? For him to get real game time would require an injury ... probably several of them.

It might be wiser to leave the spot for a released player that might add something in minimal minutes.

If we do spend the money, should we get a prospect or a veteran? And, if we take a prospect, is Wood worth it? I think we can do better.
Image

Return to Portland Trail Blazers