ImageImage

nj + pdx + dallas

Moderators: Moonbeam, DeBlazerRiddem

User avatar
SoHo
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,570
And1: 0
Joined: May 28, 2007

 

Post#101 » by SoHo » Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:25 am

The Truehoop blog over at ESPN has some interesting analysis on the rumored trade

He talks about how Harris might fit in our offense as well as why our roster situation makes it make sense. Of course he also talks about how terrible it could be for us if Harris didn't meet expectations and Outlaw continued to blow up.
ppp000
Pro Prospect
Posts: 920
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 18, 2007

 

Post#102 » by ppp000 » Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:37 am

Like I said Portland is high on Outlaw, Mavs are high on Harris. Besides this rumor going around, there are others that do not include Harris or Portland. In any case, the Mavs are not going to make any rash moves to lose Harris and depth when PG is not an an area of weakness for them to warrant such a big change.

And even IF the mavs were shopping Harris for Kidd, which by Dallas accounts they are NOT, I don't see the need for Portland to be involved in this deal when you guys have a nice young core.
Butter
General Manager
Posts: 8,776
And1: 421
Joined: Aug 14, 2002
Location: Youth movement, here we come
 

 

Post#103 » by Butter » Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:42 am

ppp000 wrote:Like I said Portland is high on Outlaw, Mavs are high on Harris. Besides this rumor going around, there are others that do not include Harris or Portland. In any case, the Mavs are not going to make any rash moves to lose Harris and depth when PG is not an an area of weakness for them to warrant such a big change.

And even IF the mavs were shopping Harris for Kidd, which by Dallas accounts they are NOT, I don't see the need for Portland to be involved in this deal when you guys have a nice young core.


Agreed. The Blazers should either deal straight with NJ or pass on the trade completely.
DeezXXnutZ
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,881
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 13, 2006
Location: Courtside at the Rose Garden with Jessica Simpson

 

Post#104 » by DeezXXnutZ » Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:45 am

Butter wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Agreed. The Blazers should either deal straight with NJ or pass on the trade completely.


Even if we are going for Kidd I don't feel Outlaw will be on the table..Martell is the trade piece in my mind....
User avatar
Fitz303
General Manager
Posts: 8,201
And1: 1,844
Joined: Oct 18, 2006
Location: Portland

 

Post#105 » by Fitz303 » Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:50 am

If there is ANY way of getting Harris without giving up Roy, LMA, Oden, or Outlaw, KP would be an idiot not to take it. I would take back Dampiers ridiculous contract if it meant getting Harris. The kids numbers do him no justice. He is a VERY good player (also a great character guy) and if giving up Webster, Jack, and a 1st rd pick would bring him in, I hope KP would sign without a second thought
Butter
General Manager
Posts: 8,776
And1: 421
Joined: Aug 14, 2002
Location: Youth movement, here we come
 

 

Post#106 » by Butter » Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:53 am

DeezXXnutZ wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Even if we are going for Kidd I don't feel Outlaw will be on the table..Martell is the trade piece in my mind....


I have no idea if the Blazers are even interested in dealing with anyone right now, but I can't really see a good reason to bring in Harris when the Blazers have so many young PG's with potential to be solid starters in this league.

If the Blazers were to make a deal, I'd much rather see Kidd playing for this year and next, expire, and leave the Blazer with a significant cap space. In that span, they would hopefully be able to identify if any of their current PG's are going to be able to step up, or if they need to make a run at a different PG with all of that $$$. :o
Norm2953
RealGM
Posts: 16,500
And1: 2,235
Joined: May 17, 2003
Location: Oregon

 

Post#107 » by Norm2953 » Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:10 am

I'd like to know how everyone thinks Devon Harris would fit with
Portland if the trade somehow comes down?

I'm not totally unopposed to the deal if it yields us a serious
upgrade at a spot we could use an upgrade (PG). Four months
ago, we would have jumped at moving Outlaw, Frye and JJ
for Harris but I'd be uncomfortable losing Frye and Outlaw
from our front court.
Billy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,623
And1: 161
Joined: Aug 14, 2001
 

 

Post#108 » by Billy » Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:21 am

If ESPN grows the cajones to put something on the main page of their site that isn't an insider article we may have something.
Ripcity4life
Analyst
Posts: 3,062
And1: 219
Joined: Jul 09, 2006

 

Post#109 » by Ripcity4life » Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:28 am

I am 99% sure the trade as laid out by that Paper and reported on ESPN does not even pass the Trade checker test. this being the case the ONLY thing that MIGHT be true is that either NJ or Dallas was/is trying to get the Blazers involved. Everything after that is complete and utter GARBAGE.

Let's not even mention the fact that it makes NO sense for the Blazers to pull the trigger. I believe its getting close to time to LOCK this SILLY/STUPID/IDIOTIC Thread, pick your word it fits.


NEXT TOPIC ............
Image
User avatar
mojomarc
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,931
And1: 1,088
Joined: Jun 01, 2004
Location: Funkytown

 

Post#110 » by mojomarc » Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:29 am

Billy wrote:If ESPN grows the cajones to put something on the main page of their site that isn't an insider article we may have something.


There's nothing on Insider that we haven't already discussed in this thread.
User avatar
Dakotah612
Head Coach
Posts: 6,758
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 15, 2003
Location: Minnesota

 

Post#111 » by Dakotah612 » Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:34 am

Failed Trade Scenario
Sorry, but this trade does not work.

There were BYC players involved in this trade, so this trade is subject to the BYC provisions of the CBA. Due to New Jersey, Dallas and Portland being over the cap, the 25% trade rule is invoked. New Jersey, Dallas and Portland had to be no more than 125% plus $100,000 of the salary given out for the trade to be accepted, which did not happen here (only New Jersey met the condition). This trade does not satisfy the provisions of the Collective Bargaining Agreement.


Trade ID #4452796
"Damn the Blazers. Damn them to hell. They are working the rest of the league like a speedbag."
- Bill Simmons
User avatar
Dakotah612
Head Coach
Posts: 6,758
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 15, 2003
Location: Minnesota

 

Post#112 » by Dakotah612 » Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:36 am

Devin Harris fits our system and complements Brandon Roy to a T. He can score, pass, and defend. However, this deal overpaying for him by A LOT.
"Damn the Blazers. Damn them to hell. They are working the rest of the league like a speedbag."
- Bill Simmons
User avatar
Pugsley_2491
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,253
And1: 3
Joined: Aug 29, 2007

 

Post#113 » by Pugsley_2491 » Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:40 am

http://myespn.go.com/blogs/truehoop/0-2 ... -Fun-.html

interesting take on the situation from Pritchard's perspective.
Billy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,623
And1: 161
Joined: Aug 14, 2001
 

 

Post#114 » by Billy » Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:41 am

mojomarc wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



There's nothing on Insider that we haven't already discussed in this thread.


I know. I was commenting on the fact that ESPN is doing "teasers" for a possible trade. Unless they are willing to put it in black and white I don't think they have anything worth reporting yet. That's all I'm sayin :)
User avatar
SaintofKillers
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,001
And1: 506
Joined: Aug 16, 2003
 

 

Post#115 » by SaintofKillers » Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:51 am

mojomarc wrote:He's a point guard on a very good offensive team with guys like Stackhouse and Dirk to pass to, and he can't even average more assists than Brandon does?


Harris is not a PG. His value lies in his ability to get to the rim at will (although saying it's top 10 material is an overstatement of epic proportions) and provide elite-level perimeter defense, provided its coupled with a big man that can defend pick-and-rolls.

His downside is that his jump shot goes from non-existent to spotty, reacts to every foul call like he's been accused of raping a chinchilla, and has the playmaking skills of Andrew Declerq.

So you got to weight which is more important to you.

mharris3 wrote:If Devin Harris is all that - then why do the Mavericks need Jason Kidd?


Our core is approaching, or are already in their 30s; the championship window is closing. If you can get the best point guard in the league then you do it.
Image
ppp000
Pro Prospect
Posts: 920
And1: 0
Joined: Nov 18, 2007

 

Post#116 » by ppp000 » Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:59 am

If the Mavs really were willing to give up Harris, why the need for a third team to be involved? Why not just a simple Harris+filler+crap for Kidd.

I don't see much incentive for Portland in this. Probably b/c this rumor is bogus.
User avatar
SaintofKillers
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,001
And1: 506
Joined: Aug 16, 2003
 

 

Post#117 » by SaintofKillers » Thu Jan 31, 2008 4:11 am

ppp000 wrote:If the Mavs really were willing to give up Harris, why the need for a third team to be involved? Why not just a simple Harris+filler+crap for Kidd.


Bingo, which is why I think this rumor is bogus. It also doesn't jive with Cuban's over-the-top "crack dealer" response.
Billy
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 12,623
And1: 161
Joined: Aug 14, 2001
 

 

Post#118 » by Billy » Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:25 am

Don't know if this has been posted, but this is an article from Adrian Wojnarowski:

Link

If so I'm sorry and I must've missed it.

Normally I wouldn't give this guy the time of day, but he did also report this completely far fetched deal shortly before the draft:

Link
abuzz
Senior
Posts: 533
And1: 83
Joined: Sep 24, 2005
Location: Rockville, MD

 

Post#119 » by abuzz » Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:31 am

Lucky Charms bought me to my senses and to pay attention to the postings that appear like airports ':wink:'

Ten pages too. ':oops:'

Here is more to the rumor mill.


http://www.protrade.com/content/Display ... 6376561661
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,469
And1: 8,178
Joined: May 28, 2007

 

Post#120 » by Wizenheimer » Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:37 am

all these different 'sources' reporting the same ridiculous trade.

Here's what I think it is: this is basically BS put out by NJ's FO to try and drive Kidd's price up.

I guess another way to put it would be to say it's a lie

Return to Portland Trail Blazers