ImageImage

Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything?

Moderators: Moonbeam, DeBlazerRiddem

DeBlazerRiddem
Forum Mod - Blazers
Forum Mod - Blazers
Posts: 14,617
And1: 6,612
Joined: Mar 11, 2010

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1021 » by DeBlazerRiddem » Mon Feb 3, 2025 7:12 pm

Walton1one wrote:
tester551 wrote:
Butter wrote:
ID bet it's down to Simon's and Sexton

Magic fans think they're in the running for Cam Johnson.

Also a few think they might target Tre Jones.


Yeah, ORL just does not seem to be that interested in Simons, kind of chasing every player but him. Makes you wonder if they have had discussions with Cronin and the asking price is ridiculous, so they have moved on. If Cronin wanted (2) 1st's for example or a 1st & Black, then ORL is right to move on, better off spending those (2) 1st's on Cam Johnson, who is a better player on a better contract.

Even Sexton's stats are better than Simons this year:
18.7ppg 47.8% FG - 41.4% 3ptFG

Simons is, 18.2ppg 42.4% FG - 36.9% 3ptFG%

I think it could be that rumors are true about Cronin, he sets unrealistic prices on his players and refuses to move off them. Hope I am wrong, but certainly doesn't appear to be the case so far.


Orlando fans have been pretty adamant that their FO wants and focuses on 2-way and defensive minded players and their roster moves have generally reflected this, going for guards like Black and Suggs when better offensive options were available. So I can buy the theory that they just simply aren't real interested in Simons, unless maybe we legit just give him away (and some folks here would be more than happy to do so.)

No idea regarding Cronin, he doesn't seem to be real pro-active moving players which is a major problem for where we currently sit. In theory setting the starting price high is not a bad negotiating strategy, but it cannot be so high that you prevent yourself from making moves.

There is often sometimes other context to consider, the Lakers trade with Grant is a good example, the second pick was asked for because we would have to eat bad salary and waive like 3-4 of our young players and so wanted compensation for that. Maybe we should have done that, trade Grant, waive a bunch of young players, and eat useless 2-3 year contracts all for a single measly Lakers pick that was probably protected anyways, but I can see where the juice wasn't worth the squeeze from them without a second pick in that scenario. I know I don't value Laker picks very highly and the Luka trade shows exactly why. But of course when rumors leak they don't mention all the secondary costs Portland would incur for a Grant for 1 first round pick, they just say Portland wants 2 picks for Grant and not Portland wants a protected pick for Grant and a protected pick for waiving players and eating useless contracts, which is still maybe too much to ask but not quite as unreasonable in that context. But I am generally a bit skeptical of how trades leak to the fans, big market teams seem to be much better at getting their narrative out there.

But regardless, results matter more than excuses. I can buy a trade or two falling apart because the other team asks for too much and gives too little but when it happens time and time again then there is a problem to be addressed. He has a couple days but if all 3 of the players in this thread post are still on the team post the deadline no quarter should be given.
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,166
And1: 3,114
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1022 » by PDXKnight » Mon Feb 3, 2025 7:32 pm

I have to think there would be a bidder on ant if we weren't asking too much. He's overpaid but his contract has 1 year remaining after this so it's not that horrendous to prospective teams I'd wager.

Ayton is probably a big more difficult to match salary wise. Quite often teams would be giving up 2-3 players of similar production in order to match the money whereas with ants figure teams could get it done with 2 players or less quite often
tblazrdude
Ballboy
Posts: 42
And1: 11
Joined: Jun 25, 2013

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1023 » by tblazrdude » Mon Feb 3, 2025 7:33 pm

DeBlazerRiddem wrote:
Walton1one wrote:
tester551 wrote:Magic fans think they're in the running for Cam Johnson.

Also a few think they might target Tre Jones.


Yeah, ORL just does not seem to be that interested in Simons, kind of chasing every player but him. Makes you wonder if they have had discussions with Cronin and the asking price is ridiculous, so they have moved on. If Cronin wanted (2) 1st's for example or a 1st & Black, then ORL is right to move on, better off spending those (2) 1st's on Cam Johnson, who is a better player on a better contract.

Even Sexton's stats are better than Simons this year:
18.7ppg 47.8% FG - 41.4% 3ptFG

Simons is, 18.2ppg 42.4% FG - 36.9% 3ptFG%

I think it could be that rumors are true about Cronin, he sets unrealistic prices on his players and refuses to move off them. Hope I am wrong, but certainly doesn't appear to be the case so far.


the Lakers trade with Grant is a good example, the second pick was asked for because we would have to eat bad salary and waive like 3-4 of our young players and so wanted compensation for that. Maybe we should have done that, trade Grant, waive a bunch of young players, and eat useless 2-3 year contracts all for a single measly Lakers pick that was probably protected anyways,


You're spot on. I actually think Joe would have accepted an unprotected first, but am guessing the offer was a crappy protected first that turned into seconds eventually. Paired with the ballast you'd have to bring back and asking for 2 firsts was his way of getting the protections removed from that first. I don't actually think he wouldn't have done the deal without the 2nd first. 'Joe always talks about both sides getting what they want', setting the price at 2 firsts was his way of moving the deal zone towards the 1 good first he wanted.
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,166
And1: 3,114
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1024 » by PDXKnight » Mon Feb 3, 2025 7:38 pm

tblazrdude wrote:
DeBlazerRiddem wrote:
Walton1one wrote:
Yeah, ORL just does not seem to be that interested in Simons, kind of chasing every player but him. Makes you wonder if they have had discussions with Cronin and the asking price is ridiculous, so they have moved on. If Cronin wanted (2) 1st's for example or a 1st & Black, then ORL is right to move on, better off spending those (2) 1st's on Cam Johnson, who is a better player on a better contract.

Even Sexton's stats are better than Simons this year:
18.7ppg 47.8% FG - 41.4% 3ptFG

Simons is, 18.2ppg 42.4% FG - 36.9% 3ptFG%

I think it could be that rumors are true about Cronin, he sets unrealistic prices on his players and refuses to move off them. Hope I am wrong, but certainly doesn't appear to be the case so far.


the Lakers trade with Grant is a good example, the second pick was asked for because we would have to eat bad salary and waive like 3-4 of our young players and so wanted compensation for that. Maybe we should have done that, trade Grant, waive a bunch of young players, and eat useless 2-3 year contracts all for a single measly Lakers pick that was probably protected anyways,


You're spot on. I actually think Joe would have accepted an unprotected first, but am guessing the offer was a crappy protected first that turned into seconds eventually. Paired with the ballast you'd have to bring back and asking for 2 firsts was his way of getting the protections removed from that first. I don't actually think he wouldn't have done the deal without the 2nd first. 'Joe always talks about both sides getting what they want', setting the price at 2 firsts was his way of moving the deal zone towards the 1 good first he wanted.


This could well be. And considering the Lakers are repeatedly able to add an all star for a first or two and a pile of dirt with the help of the agents cant say i blame them not coming off the protection on just the 1 first either..
tblazrdude
Ballboy
Posts: 42
And1: 11
Joined: Jun 25, 2013

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1025 » by tblazrdude » Mon Feb 3, 2025 7:48 pm

PDXKnight wrote:
tblazrdude wrote:
DeBlazerRiddem wrote:
the Lakers trade with Grant is a good example, the second pick was asked for because we would have to eat bad salary and waive like 3-4 of our young players and so wanted compensation for that. Maybe we should have done that, trade Grant, waive a bunch of young players, and eat useless 2-3 year contracts all for a single measly Lakers pick that was probably protected anyways,


You're spot on. I actually think Joe would have accepted an unprotected first, but am guessing the offer was a crappy protected first that turned into seconds eventually. Paired with the ballast you'd have to bring back and asking for 2 firsts was his way of getting the protections removed from that first. I don't actually think he wouldn't have done the deal without the 2nd first. 'Joe always talks about both sides getting what they want', setting the price at 2 firsts was his way of moving the deal zone towards the 1 good first he wanted.


This could well be. And considering the Lakers are repeatedly able to add an all star for a first or two and a pile of dirt with the help of the agents cant say i blame them not coming off the protection on just the 1 first either..


yeah sometimes your old pal will call you up and you can manipulate their desparation.

the fact that the lakers have 'anything' left in terms of young players or picks is ridiculous.
Walton1one
Starter
Posts: 2,175
And1: 1,210
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1026 » by Walton1one » Mon Feb 3, 2025 11:29 pm

It certainly appears as if ORL is looking elsewhere. If they don't trade for Simons, what teams might? Only other team Ic an think of is DET?

Read on Twitter
Walton1one
Starter
Posts: 2,175
And1: 1,210
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1027 » by Walton1one » Mon Feb 3, 2025 11:47 pm

If Doncic joins Fox as potential 2026 free agents “off the table,” then the top remaining potential 2026 free agents would be Atlanta’s Trae Young ($49 million player option), Milwaukee’s Damian Lillard ($63 million player option for 2026-27), Boston’s Kristaps Porzingis, Memphis’ Jaren Jackson Jr., the Knicks’ Mikal Bridges and Phoenix’s Kevin Durant. Some of those players are expected to sign extensions before 2026, including Jackson and Bridges.

Others who could exercise free agency that summer of 2026 include Portland’s DeAndre Ayton and Anfernee Simons, Chicago’s Zach LaVine ($49 million player option), Houston’s Fred Van Vleet, Utah’s Colin Sexton, Chicago’s Coby White, the Pelicans’ C.J. McCollum and the Clippers’ James Harden.


https://www.miamiherald.com/sports/nba/miami-heat/article299621044.html

POR has potentially over $88+ million coming off the books in 26' if they let Ayton\Simons\RW3\Thybulle walk, but no one significant to spend it on, even if that was Cronin's master plan? The value of those 5 players will only go down in the offseason and down again at the next deadline.

If none of these guys are dealt, it certainly appears that it is b\c Cronin thinks they are longer term pieces, which is foolish for 1 & mystifying for 2, considering he rarely has mentioned any of these guys when speaking about POR future. So if neither one of these (cap space in 26', keeping vets b\c he thinks they can be playoff competitive with them) are true, then that means he is on the verge of greatly overplaying his hand (in terms of their trade value), just like Masai Ujiri in TOR did.
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,166
And1: 3,114
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1028 » by PDXKnight » Tue Feb 4, 2025 12:11 am

Feels like the 2024 off season was a major botch. We had players teams wanted and those teams have seemingly said they will seek other avenues based on our asking price
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,166
And1: 3,114
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1029 » by PDXKnight » Tue Feb 4, 2025 12:14 am

Walton1one wrote:
If Doncic joins Fox as potential 2026 free agents “off the table,” then the top remaining potential 2026 free agents would be Atlanta’s Trae Young ($49 million player option), Milwaukee’s Damian Lillard ($63 million player option for 2026-27), Boston’s Kristaps Porzingis, Memphis’ Jaren Jackson Jr., the Knicks’ Mikal Bridges and Phoenix’s Kevin Durant. Some of those players are expected to sign extensions before 2026, including Jackson and Bridges.

Others who could exercise free agency that summer of 2026 include Portland’s DeAndre Ayton and Anfernee Simons, Chicago’s Zach LaVine ($49 million player option), Houston’s Fred Van Vleet, Utah’s Colin Sexton, Chicago’s Coby White, the Pelicans’ C.J. McCollum and the Clippers’ James Harden.


https://www.miamiherald.com/sports/nba/miami-heat/article299621044.html

POR has potentially over $88+ million coming off the books in 26' if they let Ayton\Simons\RW3\Thybulle walk, but no one significant to spend it on, even if that was Cronin's master plan? The value of those 5 players will only go down in the offseason and down again at the next deadline.

If none of these guys are dealt, it certainly appears that it is b\c Cronin thinks they are longer term pieces, which is foolish for 1 & mystifying for 2, considering he rarely has mentioned any of these guys when speaking about POR future. So if neither one of these (cap space in 26', keeping vets b\c he thinks they can be playoff competitive with them) are true, then that means he is on the verge of greatly overplaying his hand (in terms of their trade value), just like Masai Ujiri in TOR did.


I hope we don't see them as long term players at least If the money is gonna line out anywhere near what it is currently.

Cap space can give us room for flexibility to make moves and take firsts for cap relief so I wouldn't underestimate that. But I would underestimate cronins ability to not squander that money before we get the chance to use that flexibility..
DaVoiceMaster
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,084
And1: 2,393
Joined: Sep 26, 2003
Contact:
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1030 » by DaVoiceMaster » Tue Feb 4, 2025 12:24 am

I'm not greedy when it comes to Grant. Just give me the players and call it good.
DaVoiceMaster
Senior Mod - Trail Blazers
12/27/2017 - 01/03/2018
Sinobas
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,802
And1: 609
Joined: Jun 20, 2008

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1031 » by Sinobas » Tue Feb 4, 2025 12:34 am

Walton1one wrote:
If Doncic joins Fox as potential 2026 free agents “off the table,” then the top remaining potential 2026 free agents would be Atlanta’s Trae Young ($49 million player option), Milwaukee’s Damian Lillard ($63 million player option for 2026-27), Boston’s Kristaps Porzingis, Memphis’ Jaren Jackson Jr., the Knicks’ Mikal Bridges and Phoenix’s Kevin Durant. Some of those players are expected to sign extensions before 2026, including Jackson and Bridges.

Others who could exercise free agency that summer of 2026 include Portland’s DeAndre Ayton and Anfernee Simons, Chicago’s Zach LaVine ($49 million player option), Houston’s Fred Van Vleet, Utah’s Colin Sexton, Chicago’s Coby White, the Pelicans’ C.J. McCollum and the Clippers’ James Harden.


https://www.miamiherald.com/sports/nba/miami-heat/article299621044.html

POR has potentially over $88+ million coming off the books in 26' if they let Ayton\Simons\RW3\Thybulle walk, but no one significant to spend it on, even if that was Cronin's master plan? The value of those 5 players will only go down in the offseason and down again at the next deadline.

If none of these guys are dealt, it certainly appears that it is b\c Cronin thinks they are longer term pieces, which is foolish for 1 & mystifying for 2, considering he rarely has mentioned any of these guys when speaking about POR future. So if neither one of these (cap space in 26', keeping vets b\c he thinks they can be playoff competitive with them) are true, then that means he is on the verge of greatly overplaying his hand (in terms of their trade value), just like Masai Ujiri in TOR did.


We could actually re-sign Damian Lillard, but he'd have to want to opt out of his super max to sign with us.

We'll be having to pay Sharpe that year, then Scoot and Camara the following year. I can see us keeping Ayton at 10 mil per year...
Tim Lehrbach
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,111
And1: 4,379
Joined: Jul 29, 2001
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1032 » by Tim Lehrbach » Tue Feb 4, 2025 12:52 am

It is maddening being so in the dark. I appreciate y'all fumbling through it with best guesses and ideas and hopes, but we just don't know nuthin. Cronin could be jealously guarding these players with visions of huge hauls, or he could be offering them left and right with no takers. He could be excited to extend or re-sign them for years to come, or he could be patiently waiting for them to walk.

It's been months and there is zero solid intel about actual offers made and rejected from any side. Just murmurs about "interest" and "asking prices."

The more time that passes, the more I am pinning my hopes to just letting these guys expire and move on. Just please don't retain them or trade them for even worse contracts.
Clipsz 4 Life
January 20, 2002-May 17, 2006
Saxon
February 20, 2001-August 9, 2007
DaVoiceMaster
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,084
And1: 2,393
Joined: Sep 26, 2003
Contact:
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1033 » by DaVoiceMaster » Tue Feb 4, 2025 1:03 am

If we trade Ayton, we will likely take back a contract(s) similar in size and length. Clingan is nowhere near ready for starter minutes. If Ayton is open to signing an extension for around 3 years, 15M, with the 3rd year being a team option, should the Blazers hang onto him? He has been playing fairly well lately. I wonder if people would have an issue with him if he was making half of what he currently makes.
DaVoiceMaster
Senior Mod - Trail Blazers
12/27/2017 - 01/03/2018
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,166
And1: 3,114
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1034 » by PDXKnight » Tue Feb 4, 2025 1:10 am

DaVoiceMaster wrote:If we trade Ayton, we will likely take back a contract(s) similar in size and length. Clingan is nowhere near ready for starter minutes. If Ayton is open to signing an extension for around 3 years, 15M, with the 3rd year being a team option, should the Blazers hang onto him? He has been playing fairly well lately. I wonder if people would have an issue with him if he was making half of what he currently makes.


Personally i just want him gone but I could live with that deal as he'd be very tradeable
Butter
General Manager
Posts: 8,744
And1: 396
Joined: Aug 14, 2002
Location: Youth movement, here we come
 

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1035 » by Butter » Tue Feb 4, 2025 1:33 am

Walton1one wrote:It certainly appears as if ORL is looking elsewhere. If they don't trade for Simons, what teams might? Only other team Ic an think of is DET?

Read on Twitter


Dang it
Rip City, baby!!!!
Norm2953
RealGM
Posts: 16,460
And1: 2,207
Joined: May 17, 2003
Location: Oregon

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1036 » by Norm2953 » Tue Feb 4, 2025 1:34 am

I would find it difficult to believe Ayton averaging 14.5/10.1 would accept a $45/3
extension from a lottery bound Blazers team.

Let's see first if he's still a Blazer on Friday
kdawg32086
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 10,928
And1: 1,090
Joined: Jun 12, 2004
Location: Clark County, Washington
         

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1037 » by kdawg32086 » Tue Feb 4, 2025 2:30 am

What does everyone think about the idea of sending Time Lord to Houston for Jeff Green and the 2027 Suns FRP?
Image
Thank you triplemke23 for the sig.
Blazinaway
General Manager
Posts: 8,828
And1: 1,585
Joined: Jan 27, 2009

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1038 » by Blazinaway » Tue Feb 4, 2025 2:30 am

Norm2953 wrote:I would find it difficult to believe Ayton averaging 14.5/10.1 would accept a $45/3
extension from a lottery bound Blazers team.

Let's see first if he's still a Blazer on Friday


I don't think there is much of a market for him around the league unless he comes fairly cheap - the "book" is out on him. So, 15 mil per yr after current contract expires IMO is probably his range.
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,166
And1: 3,114
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1039 » by PDXKnight » Tue Feb 4, 2025 2:35 am

kdawg32086 wrote:What does everyone think about the idea of sending Time Lord to Houston for Jeff Green and the 2027 Suns FRP?


I'd do it personally
Blazinaway
General Manager
Posts: 8,828
And1: 1,585
Joined: Jan 27, 2009

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#1040 » by Blazinaway » Tue Feb 4, 2025 2:36 am

kdawg32086 wrote:What does everyone think about the idea of sending Time Lord to Houston for Jeff Green and the 2027 Suns FRP?

is that 2027 Suns pick fully unprotected? if it is I am all in, though I'd be surprised if HOU did that trade for a fully unprotected pick from the Suns since their situation does not look very promising a few years out

Return to Portland Trail Blazers