Cali_Blazer wrote:If we do full rebuild how does that make Cho feel?
Validated... It was a huge mistake to let him go like that. But Paul Allen wants to run the show w/o a gm.
Moderators: Moonbeam, DeBlazerRiddem
Cali_Blazer wrote:If we do full rebuild how does that make Cho feel?

Prodigy73 wrote:fredericklove wrote:Chill out, bro. Things will get better when we face the next 3 games in Nets, Mavs and Rockets, relax, chill.
If we go 0-3 during that Imma chillllllllllllll
number15 wrote:If Tracy McGrady makes it to the HOF, then so should DeMar Derozan
Oden2 wrote:On second thought, I made a list of my top prospects. This draft is LOADED and we should be able to get two studs at 6 and 11. Hopefully we dont do something stupid. I honestly wouldnt take Drummond at 6.
DusterBuster wrote:Oden2 wrote:On second thought, I made a list of my top prospects. This draft is LOADED and we should be able to get two studs at 6 and 11. Hopefully we dont do something stupid. I honestly wouldnt take Drummond at 6.
I haven't done much research on MKG, but your post has made me want to read up on him a bit more.
As for the part of your post I quoted here, assuming things hold to form, the draft would have to look like this for Drummond to be available at 6.....
1 Davis
2 Robinson
3 MKG
4 Beal
5 Barnes
If you don't want to take the chance on Drum, who would you take at 6?
One rumor flying around has the Cavs offering their Nos. 4 and 24 picks to Charlotte for the Bobcats’ No. 2. Another one is 4 and 24 for Portland’s 6 and 11.
Blazinaway wrote:The more I look at hear about Damien Lillard the more I like. I think he may go top 8, a lot will be based on workouts and IMO the only real question about him is the "small school low competition" knock. The guy supposedly has a 40 inch vertical and 6'9"" wingspan, that's more then Westbrook in both cases
GreenRiddler wrote:Blazinaway wrote:The more I look at hear about Damien Lillard the more I like. I think he may go top 8, a lot will be based on workouts and IMO the only real question about him is the "small school low competition" knock. The guy supposedly has a 40 inch vertical and 6'9"" wingspan, that's more then Westbrook in both cases
Just because a guy has a higher vertical than Westbrook Dose not mean he is Westbrook, if so then Iman Shumpert would have been the second pick last year. There is no Westbrook in this draft, The only reason Lillard is even a lottery pick this year is cause there are no pg's this year if this was 2009 he wouldn't have even cracked the 1st round. I wouldn't even pick him at 11 if we got a big at 6, I would have ever loooove to know where you heard that 6'9" wingspan cause I searched DX and a number of other places that have shown no measurements. Trust me if he really did have that kind of wingspan it would be noticeable in pics (like Lamb). I don't know why you guys want this kid so much did we not just trade Jerryd Bayless 2 years ago why would we draft him again except this time higher????
Blazinaway wrote:GreenRiddler wrote:Blazinaway wrote:The more I look at hear about Damien Lillard the more I like. I think he may go top 8, a lot will be based on workouts and IMO the only real question about him is the "small school low competition" knock. The guy supposedly has a 40 inch vertical and 6'9"" wingspan, that's more then Westbrook in both cases
Just because a guy has a higher vertical than Westbrook Dose not mean he is Westbrook, if so then Iman Shumpert would have been the second pick last year. There is no Westbrook in this draft, The only reason Lillard is even a lottery pick this year is cause there are no pg's this year if this was 2009 he wouldn't have even cracked the 1st round. I wouldn't even pick him at 11 if we got a big at 6, I would have ever loooove to know where you heard that 6'9" wingspan cause I searched DX and a number of other places that have shown no measurements. Trust me if he really did have that kind of wingspan it would be noticeable in pics (like Lamb). I don't know why you guys want this kid so much did we not just trade Jerryd Bayless 2 years ago why would we draft him again except this time higher????
IMO he much more of a PG coming out of college then Bayless was, Bayless was at best a combo guard, Lillard has four years as a PG and improved significantly every year and IMO can contribute almost immediately vs Bayless who was raw. We will see
GreenRiddler wrote:and he missed like 19 games his junior season with a foot injury I don't want a injury player at #6
#Drummond4life
Blazinaway wrote:GreenRiddler wrote:and he missed like 19 games his junior season with a foot injury I don't want a injury player at #6
#Drummond4life
did you not even read my wingspan post at 6'9"? way more than bayless, and he played a full season last yr after the foot injury, I'd say he's fully healed. How many knee surgeries did Roy have and we still drafted him?

Return to Portland Trail Blazers