Khazim wrote:Wizenheimer wrote:Delladova got 9.5 million/year from the Bucks
Good to know we aren't the only one's handing out crazy over-pays...
I think people need to get used to these kinds of numbers for backups. 7-10mil is the new 5mil MLE.
Moderators: Moonbeam, DeBlazerRiddem
Khazim wrote:Wizenheimer wrote:Delladova got 9.5 million/year from the Bucks
Good to know we aren't the only one's handing out crazy over-pays...
TheEnforcer20 wrote:I understand that the rest of the NBA is spending like drunken sailors but Portland has to be smart. Olshey looks more like Isaiah Thomas right now than a GM with a long or short term plan. If there is no player who fits an immediate need or not a vast improvement over what you have, then re-sign your own players and develop them and take a gamble on a guy like Terrence Jones. Wait for the right guy and situation to make changes for the better not for the sake of just changing things up.
DusterBuster wrote:Khazim wrote:Wizenheimer wrote:Delladova got 9.5 million/year from the Bucks
Good to know we aren't the only one's handing out crazy over-pays...
I think people need to get used to these kinds of numbers for backups. 7-10mil is the new 5mil MLE.
TheEnforcer20 wrote:I understand that the rest of the NBA is spending like drunken sailors but Portland has to be smart. Olshey looks more like Isaiah Thomas right now than a GM with a long or short term plan. If there is no player who fits an immediate need or not a vast improvement over what you have, then re-sign your own players and develop them and take a gamble on a guy like Terrence Jones. Wait for the right guy and situation to make changes for the better not for the sake of just changing things up.
DusterBuster wrote:TheEnforcer20 wrote:I understand that the rest of the NBA is spending like drunken sailors but Portland has to be smart. Olshey looks more like Isaiah Thomas right now than a GM with a long or short term plan. If there is no player who fits an immediate need or not a vast improvement over what you have, then re-sign your own players and develop them and take a gamble on a guy like Terrence Jones. Wait for the right guy and situation to make changes for the better not for the sake of just changing things up.
This isn't about the NBA spending like drunken sailors. This is the new reality for NBA contracts. This is what happens with a nearly 100 million dollar salary cap.
Blazinaway wrote:DusterBuster wrote:Khazim wrote:Good to know we aren't the only one's handing out crazy over-pays...
I think people need to get used to these kinds of numbers for backups. 7-10mil is the new 5mil MLE.
Bayless got 9 mil per and I think Augustin got close to 8 mil per
TheEnforcer20 wrote:DusterBuster wrote:TheEnforcer20 wrote:I understand that the rest of the NBA is spending like drunken sailors but Portland has to be smart. Olshey looks more like Isaiah Thomas right now than a GM with a long or short term plan. If there is no player who fits an immediate need or not a vast improvement over what you have, then re-sign your own players and develop them and take a gamble on a guy like Terrence Jones. Wait for the right guy and situation to make changes for the better not for the sake of just changing things up.
This isn't about the NBA spending like drunken sailors. This is the new reality for NBA contracts. This is what happens with a nearly 100 million dollar salary cap.
it is true that there is a large salary cap but not every team is throwing out dollars like they are at a strip club.
Run PDX wrote:Idea...
S&T Crabbe to Sacramento for Kosta Koufus and Ben McLemore.
WHY FOR PORTLAND?
Reason 1: If Crabbe demands $15M, we can cut roughly $3M with this deal.
Reason 2: Koufus played with Turner in college and McCollum in high school.
Reason 3: McLemore deserves a chance to play with a better team.
WHY FOR SACRAMENTO?
Reason 1: The cap hit would be smaller for Crabbe.
Reason 2: The Kings are loaded at center, and they really have no need for Koufus.
Reason 3: McLemore would fall further into the bench if Sacramento adds Crabbe and Waiters anyway.
DusterBuster wrote:Run PDX wrote:Idea...
S&T Crabbe to Sacramento for Kosta Koufus and Ben McLemore.
WHY FOR PORTLAND?
Reason 1: If Crabbe demands $15M, we can cut roughly $3M with this deal.
Reason 2: Koufus played with Turner in college and McCollum in high school.
Reason 3: McLemore deserves a chance to play with a better team.
WHY FOR SACRAMENTO?
Reason 1: The cap hit would be smaller for Crabbe.
Reason 2: The Kings are loaded at center, and they really have no need for Koufus.
Reason 3: McLemore would fall further into the bench if Sacramento adds Crabbe and Waiters anyway.
I'd love this.
DusterBuster wrote:TheEnforcer20 wrote:DusterBuster wrote:
This isn't about the NBA spending like drunken sailors. This is the new reality for NBA contracts. This is what happens with a nearly 100 million dollar salary cap.
it is true that there is a large salary cap but not every team is throwing out dollars like they are at a strip club.
Actually, most of them are and if they haven't yet, it hasn't been for a lack of trying.
DusterBuster wrote:Speaking of weird salaries, ESPN has Meyers Leonard listed as getting 24mil next season lol: http://espn.go.com/nba/salaries
Wizenheimer wrote:well, not that it matters much but on the trades board there are two polls
one is 'who won the deal, Turner or Blazers. Turner leads 41-0
the other is 'What is the worst deal so far: Turner's is getting 62% of the vote
ouch
in other news, will this thread be the first thread in years to hit 100 pages? Can't remember the last thread that did that
TheEnforcer20 wrote:DusterBuster wrote:TheEnforcer20 wrote:it is true that there is a large salary cap but not every team is throwing out dollars like they are at a strip club.
Actually, most of them are and if they haven't yet, it hasn't been for a lack of trying.
I understand that is the impression but I don't see teams like Phoenix or Chicago making it rain. The Pacers got a need for 30mil and PDX just spent 40 mil more for a player that does nothing to vastly improve the team. The teams that have dropped coin for the most part had a need and paid and overpaid for that need, PDX does not need Turner, they could keep what they have and make a run at a project like Jones. Turner does not solve any issues that Portland has, they will still have no rim protector and they have little to no offensive production in the post. Turner is not Wesley Matthews defensively on the perimeter and he can't shoot the 3, so it looks like a ton of cap space was squandered on a guy who is not true and visible need.
Jsun947 wrote:TheEnforcer20 wrote:DusterBuster wrote:
We also need some legit rim protection but getting Evan Turner isn't mutually exclusive to accomplishing that. If we renounce Leonard we'll have about 16 mil to do that...
Return to Portland Trail Blazers