Sinobas wrote:
Jerami Grant has been ass all year. He'll have a good game every now and then, but he's mostly bad. Ayton is ok, but he's one of those players where the box score makes him look better than he is. He'll slack on defense and has an inconsistent motor. There's a reason Joe drafted Clingan.
I've never heard anyone say that we paid to much for Camara. He was an extra that Joe got in the trade and he's turning into an elite role player.. And I've not seen any Blazer fan say we paid too much for Deni since he broke out of his early season slump. Acquiring Deni was a major steal, and just about everyone that follows the NBA knows that.
Some people on this board seem to be desperate to hate Cronin. But I just give him credit for the good moves he's made.
Cronin has made some good moves; he's also made plenty of bad moves. Context is important
* dismantling the idiot Olshey roster and trading away CJ-Powell-RoCo-Nance was necessary and a pair of good moves considering that he got Hart and created the assets/TPE to acquire Grant
(I also would suggest he had the Vulcans pushing him into that kind of roster clearing)
* acquiring Grant was a good move; re-signing him was a bad move
* re-signing Simons and Nurkic for far above their market value at the time were bad moves
* signing Gary Payton and hard-capping the Blazers was a bad move
* Matching the Thybulle offer sheet was a bad move; really dumb
* even though it's pretty clear that Cronin boxed Dame into the corner that 'forced' him into demanding a trade, it could be argued as a necessary move. So, maybe neutral. But coveting Ayton for 2 years as Cronin reportedly did was dumb; and making Ayton the centerpiece of the return for Dame was dumber; and agreeing to take back the total injury magnet Timelord as part of the trade was dumber-squared. Cronin traded one deeply flawed big man (Nurkic at 18M/year) for two deeply flawed big men at 47M year. That was a bad move
* getting Camara in the trade was a good move but I'm extremely skeptical that Cronin/Schmitz knew he was going to be this good
* trading for Avdija was a good move even though the timing of that kind of move is questionable, but the price was fairly steep. The Blazers paid Brogdon + 4 draft picks for Avdija. And it could be they will end up paying 2 lottery picks for him as well as their 2028 & 2030 2nd round picks. And because of Avdija's contract, he won't be signing an extension and will become UFA, and the Blazers may convey those 3 picks after Avdija signs with another team. We can't really judge the Avdija trade properly until we see what the 2029 first is and if Avdija re-signs with Portland
* never fully committing to a rebuild has been a really bad series of decisions. If Trading Dame was necessary, then also trading Simons, Grant, Ayton, Timelord, and Thybulle were necessary as well. Keeping those vets is fence-straddling at it's worst
* keep in mind that right now, the positive assets Portland got from the Dame trade are Avdija, Camara, a very likely late 1st in 2029, and a couple of swaps that may not convey. I know many will say that's a good return for an aging franchise player; maybe it is. But again: context. OKC traded Paul George and got SGA, Jalen Williams, and still have an unprotected Clippers picks in 2026 plus an unprotected Miami pick the same year; that trade has made them a championship contender. The Jazz traded Donovan Mitchell for Lauri Markkanen, Colin Sexton, Isaiah Collier and still have 3 late first round picks coming vs Portland with 1
and yes, those vets Portland has unwisely kept have added damaging wins. According to winshares, the foursome of Simons-Ayton-Grant-Timelord have added 10 wins this season. Having watched the games, I'm pretty certain it's closer to 13-15 wins. However, replacement players would have added a win or two, and more minutes for the young guys would have added a win or two
so call it 10 wins added by the vets, Subtract those wins and the Blazers would be 5th seed in the lottery. Find a way to lose another game and they'd be tied for 4th seed; lose another and they are tied for 3rd seed
Cronin inherited a team that won the equivalent of 48 games. This is his 4th season and his roster is 12th seed. Worse is that every season, because of his fence-straddling with flawed high price role-players, the Blazers are always dodging the luxury tax. They may make it to the play-in but only because other teams are tanking and injured
I'm not nearly as anti-Cronin as I was anti-Olshey. Don't even think that's possible as I hated Olshey. But I'm pretty unsatisfied with the job Cronin has done