ImageImage

Win now trade idea thread (Build around Dame!!)

Moderators: Moonbeam, DeBlazerRiddem

Dame Lizard
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,849
And1: 2,363
Joined: Dec 03, 2012
 

Re: Win now trade idea thread (Build around Dame!!) 

Post#181 » by Dame Lizard » Sun Jun 5, 2022 12:02 pm

Wizenheimer wrote:
Dame Lizard wrote:As much as I'd love Nurkic @ $8m per annum and Simons @ $12m per annum, I think Nurkic will get $13-14m per and Simons $25m per.


I'd say your number for Nurkic is probably right...maybe even a bit high

for a little bit I was thinking Ant might get 25M. Then I started to think about the reality that his hype is way higher in Portland than it is elsewhere; and that Blzer fans are a lot more excited about Ant than NBA front offices. And that 25M for 4th year guard who has only had a 25 game stretch of good games when the games didn't matter to his team.

so I revised my estimate downwards. Then, I actually took the time to look at teams that might have 25M in cap-space (there are only 2-4, at most, maybe less). Then I looked at their rosters....

for instance, at guard:

* San Antonio has Dejounte Murray (all-star PG), Keldon Johnson, Lonnie Walker Jr, Josh Richardson, Joshua Primo, & Devin Vassel

* Indiana has Malcolm Brogdon, Tyrese Haliburton, Buddy Hield, TC McConnell, & Chris Duarte

* Orlando has Cole Anthony, Jalen Suggs, Terrence Ross, RJ Hampton,, Markelle Fultz and say they want to re-sign Gary Harris

* Detroit would have to renounce the rights to Marvin Bagley to even approach 25M in space (he has a 28M cap-hold). But if they re-sign him for say, 15M, the Pistons would only have 12-15M in space. Besides that, They have Cade Cunningham, Killian Hayes, Cory Joseph, Hamidou Diallo, & Frank Jackson at guard

right there, that's the potential market for a 20M+/year deal for Simons....those 4 teams. Every one of those teams are absolutely loaded at PG. So they'd have to want to offer a major contract to an undersized SG who plays poor defense and only flashed 25 games of semi-brillance, for a bad team, in 4 years in the league. I wouldn't make sense. Now obviously, every off-season some team does something that doesn't make sense and all it would take is one GM to go bonkers about Simons and Billy-King-Allen-Crabbe Portland.....but that is very unlikely

something else too: say what you will about Cronin's deadline trades, but one thing they accomplished was clearly demonstrate that Portland had every intention of re-signing Simons. The first couple of days of the off-season are critical and I have even more doubts that any team would want to tie-up their cap-space for 3 days only to have the Blazers match

personally, I don't think Nurk's market is much more than the full-MLE; and I think Ant's is less than 20M (and I could be completely wrong). What I'm hoping is that Cronin doesn't repeat the mistake Olshey made, several times, and that's bid against himself


You've outlined really good logic Wiz, which I agree with. However, I feel that Simons and Nurkic wouldn't have agreed to rest out the remainder of the season (helping the tank) if they hadn't agreed an in-principle contract with the Blazers, as it's not a good look for a free agent to have missed the last third of the season with injury.

So if that is true, the contract would also have to be attractive enough for them to 'accept' then. Unless Portland offered them a reasonable floor and said "we'll guarantee you an offer of this no matter what happens this offseason, but feel free to entertain other more lucrative offers too".
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,477
And1: 8,186
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Win now trade idea thread (Build around Dame!!) 

Post#182 » by Wizenheimer » Sun Jun 5, 2022 3:42 pm

Dame Lizard wrote:You've outlined really good logic Wiz, which I agree with. However, I feel that Simons and Nurkic wouldn't have agreed to rest out the remainder of the season (helping the tank) if they hadn't agreed an in-principle contract with the Blazers, as it's not a good look for a free agent to have missed the last third of the season with injury.

So if that is true, the contract would also have to be attractive enough for them to 'accept' then. Unless Portland offered them a reasonable floor and said "we'll guarantee you an offer of this no matter what happens this offseason, but feel free to entertain other more lucrative offers too".


that's possible

but a large part of that possibility could be:

every Blazer and Blazer fan as well as everybody in every NBA front office was well aware of Portland tanking hard. None of those front offices were going to downgrade the value of Nurkic or Simons because of that situation. It might even be that Nurkic, Simons, and their agents are well aware of what kind of contract either player would get in this particular free agent market.

For Nurkic, missing the last 20 games of an 8 year career in which he had already missed 230 games wasn't impactful, especially considering the obvious tank. What is hurting his value are those 230 missed games and the reality that he is a traditional C in a time when traditional C's are becoming a liability to the extent that several sign minimum-5M contracts every single season.

These are the C's & big men that paid for 5M or less this season:

JaVale McGee
Robin Lopez
Taj Gibson
Bobby Portis
Gorgui Dieng
Jon Leuer
Dewayne Dedmon
DeAndre Jordan
Dwight Howard
Enes Freedom
LaMarcus Aldridge
Ed Davis
Hassan Whiteside
Andre Drummond
Cody Zeller
Willy Hernangómez
Bol Bol
Frank Kaminsky
Nemanja Bjelica
Drew Eubanks
Isaiah Hartenstein
Moses Brown

Nurkic is better than most of them, maybe all of them (arguable). But he isn't so much better than some to warrant 15M year considering his injury history and flaws

And for Simons, again, with the tank in mind, missing the last 19 games wasn't going to hurt his value. What is hurting his value is the reality that it wasn't till his 4th season, in games that didn't matter for a bad team, that he put together a stretch of around 25 games where he consistently showed starting level value. That doesn't seem enough to generate a 100M dollar contract

I get so tired of other teams signing players to bargain contracts while Portland seriously overpays. I'm hoping Cronin will operate differently because personally I think Nurk is worth about 10M/year while Simons is worth 17-18M year. I'll be real disappointed if their combined deals approach 35M/year
Case2012
Head Coach
Posts: 6,029
And1: 2,102
Joined: Jan 03, 2012
 

Re: Win now trade idea thread (Build around Dame!!) 

Post#183 » by Case2012 » Sun Jun 5, 2022 5:37 pm

I still think we should work out a sign and trade somewhere for Simons. NYC would make a lot of sense with their young core. They have toppin and I think Randle would like a change of scenery. I think he'd have a bounce back year in Portland under the leadership of Dame and away from the nightmare of the NY media. If Portland can grab an all NBA pf for Simons they should do it and not look back. If they can get Grant for a reasonable price and start Hart, we'll have gotten significantly bigger and better on defense.
Image
Instagram: @casetwelve
NotMyKawhi
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,958
And1: 5,216
Joined: Jul 13, 2018

Re: Win now trade idea thread (Build around Dame!!) 

Post#184 » by NotMyKawhi » Sun Jun 5, 2022 11:43 pm

I think you should go after OG. Sign and trade Simmons for a big.
Tim Lehrbach
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,111
And1: 4,379
Joined: Jul 29, 2001
   

Re: Win now trade idea thread (Build around Dame!!) 

Post#185 » by Tim Lehrbach » Mon Jun 6, 2022 1:52 pm

Case2012 wrote:I still think we should work out a sign and trade somewhere for Simons. NYC would make a lot of sense with their young core. They have toppin and I think Randle would like a change of scenery. I think he'd have a bounce back year in Portland under the leadership of Dame and away from the nightmare of the NY media. If Portland can grab an all NBA pf for Simons they should do it and not look back. If they can get Grant for a reasonable price and start Hart, we'll have gotten significantly bigger and better on defense.


I share your sentiments here: skepticism about Simons and the feeling that Randle has been judged harshly by fans and media. That said, I'm not convinced that's a winning trade for the Blazers. Simons, for his faults, appears to be a more reliable scorer than Randle. That might be unfair to Randle, who's been doing it longer, but what I mean is that Simons displayed a scoring arsenal and production last season that exceeds what we're used to seeing from Randle. Neither is ever going to be a plus defender, but this is probably a bigger problem for the frontcourt minutes than Randle fills than the predominantly 1/2 minutes of Simons.

Definitely open to a Simons S&T, or keeping him until midseason and trying to swing a big deal then. I don't immediately have any better ideas than yours, but I'd like to think the Blazers would pursue somebody in that elusive "big, strong, switchy forward" archetype, even if such player isn't as useful offensively as Simons or Randle. Maybe by the deadline there will be some new sellers?
Clipsz 4 Life
January 20, 2002-May 17, 2006
Saxon
February 20, 2001-August 9, 2007
Case2012
Head Coach
Posts: 6,029
And1: 2,102
Joined: Jan 03, 2012
 

Re: Win now trade idea thread (Build around Dame!!) 

Post#186 » by Case2012 » Mon Jun 6, 2022 5:43 pm

Interesting seeing who the blazers are rumored to be targeting. Bridges, Collins, Lavine, Beal etc. I don't see how any of these players are acquirable with the cap space we have and the crumbs we got back from blowing up the team. Collins is probably the most realistic with the 7th but I'm not sure he's worth it when there's rookie scale players at 7 that could be just as good and way cheaper.
Image
Instagram: @casetwelve
DaVoiceMaster
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,159
And1: 2,456
Joined: Sep 26, 2003
Contact:
   

Re: Win now trade idea thread (Build around Dame!!) 

Post#187 » by DaVoiceMaster » Tue Jun 7, 2022 2:03 am

S&T Anfernee Simons to Charlotte for S&T Miles Bridges.
What more is needed?

Ball & Simon's together might be something special.

Milwaukee 2025 pick, and Eric Bledsoe to Detroit for Jerami Grant.

Grant wants to play with Lillard and doesnt seem to be in Detroits future plans. They get a future pick that "may" be decent in three years.

Covington TPE to Detroit for Corey Joseph.

I have no idea what Joseph's role is with the team or whether he's available. He doesnt seem to fit the young team role so maybe the Blazers could grab him cheaply.

CJ TPE, Greg Brown III, and a future pick
(could the Blazers buy a pick for $5M) to Atlanta for John Collins.

This saves Atlanta a whole lot of money (I heard money is an issue). What more could the Blazers add to make this more enticing.

Sign Gorgui Dieng as a backup center.

He plays some defense and can stretch the floor offensively.

ROSTER
PG Lillard / Joseph / Dunn
SG Bridges / Hart / Johnson
SF Grant / Little / Louzada
PF Collins / Winslow / Watford
_C Nurkic / Dieng / Eubanks

Alright, how bad is this? I know the Blazers salaries are really high, but aren't they supposed to be all in? Is Ingles an option? I'm not sure when he will be healthy again.
DaVoiceMaster
Senior Mod - Trail Blazers
12/27/2017 - 01/03/2018
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,496
And1: 10,045
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Win now trade idea thread (Build around Dame!!) 

Post#188 » by BlazersBroncos » Tue Jun 7, 2022 2:43 am

I don’t think Charlotte would have any reason to turn Bridges into Ant, and think the Collin’s trade is really poor for ATL.

Obviously I would do either.

Also, what happens w/ #7?
ebott
Head Coach
Posts: 6,911
And1: 157
Joined: Jun 26, 2001
Location: Portland, Oregon
 

Re: Win now trade idea thread (Build around Dame!!) 

Post#189 » by ebott » Tue Jun 7, 2022 5:32 am

Talking about getting John Collins or OG really demonstrates how badly the Blazers screwed up the 2017 draft.
Green Apple wrote:Portland fans are and have been some of the great citizens of basketball, they are a sea of basketball knowledge and passion.
Case2012
Head Coach
Posts: 6,029
And1: 2,102
Joined: Jan 03, 2012
 

Re: Win now trade idea thread (Build around Dame!!) 

Post#190 » by Case2012 » Tue Jun 7, 2022 5:44 am

DaVoiceMaster wrote:S&T Anfernee Simons to Charlotte for S&T Miles Bridges.
What more is needed?

Ball & Simon's together might be something special.

Milwaukee 2025 pick, and Eric Bledsoe to Detroit for Jerami Grant.

Grant wants to play with Lillard and doesnt seem to be in Detroits future plans. They get a future pick that "may" be decent in three years.

Covington TPE to Detroit for Corey Joseph.

I have no idea what Joseph's role is with the team or whether he's available. He doesnt seem to fit the young team role so maybe the Blazers could grab him cheaply.

CJ TPE, Greg Brown III, and a future pick
(could the Blazers buy a pick for $5M) to Atlanta for John Collins.

This saves Atlanta a whole lot of money (I heard money is an issue). What more could the Blazers add to make this more enticing.

Sign Gorgui Dieng as a backup center.

He plays some defense and can stretch the floor offensively.

ROSTER
PG Lillard / Joseph / Dunn
SG Bridges / Hart / Johnson
SF Grant / Little / Louzada
PF Collins / Winslow / Watford
_C Nurkic / Dieng / Eubanks

Alright, how bad is this? I know the Blazers salaries are really high, but aren't they supposed to be all in? Is Ingles an option? I'm not sure when he will be healthy again.


If you could sub Nurk for Miles Turner that would be my dream roster. I think I would rather trade for him instead of Collins and start Hart at the 2 instead of Bridges. I managed to put that team together on 2k in gm mode on the highest difficulty and got fired.

Sign and trade Simons for Bridges. Trade down for 13 and 15. Trade 13 and Keon for Grant plus CJ TPE.

15, bledsoe, Milwaukee pick for Turner. Add the seconds where needed.

Dame/ Dunn/ Bwill
Hart/ Nas/ McLemore
Bridges/ Winslow/ Ingles
Grant/ Watford/ GB3
Turner/ Eubanks

I have a hard time thinking Charlotte would be interested in that unless it was essentially Simons + 7 for Bridges + 13 + 15. Not even remotely legal but if it was agreed to before the draft (also illegal) I'm not sure the value is right. Perhaps ANOTHER sign and trade for Nurkic and a tpe could get it done, but that's even more complicated. Maybe if we included Nas and Nurkic was signed and traded for Oubre? Ugh.
Image
Instagram: @casetwelve
DaVoiceMaster
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,159
And1: 2,456
Joined: Sep 26, 2003
Contact:
   

Re: Win now trade idea thread (Build around Dame!!) 

Post#191 » by DaVoiceMaster » Tue Jun 7, 2022 1:51 pm

BB and Case, excellent point. I had this all typed up and it disappeared so I started over and forgot to include the pick. Perhaps that is the trade... #7 and Simon's for #13 and Bridges? Then #13 and Bledsoe for Grant? Maybe #7 needs to go to Atlanta for Collins instead or Toronto for some type of deal for OG Anunoby?
DaVoiceMaster
Senior Mod - Trail Blazers
12/27/2017 - 01/03/2018
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,496
And1: 10,045
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Win now trade idea thread (Build around Dame!!) 

Post#192 » by BlazersBroncos » Tue Jun 7, 2022 3:56 pm

Even with Bridges posting a picture of himself with a cup of lean, I still don’t think CHA would do the swap lol
Case2012
Head Coach
Posts: 6,029
And1: 2,102
Joined: Jan 03, 2012
 

Re: Win now trade idea thread (Build around Dame!!) 

Post#193 » by Case2012 » Tue Jun 7, 2022 4:22 pm

Bridges majorly screwed up, that’s a multimillion dollar picture he just bought. I don’t think I would want him in PDX now given how bad the drug scene is here. He’d probably die of a fentanyl OD within the first year.
Image
Instagram: @casetwelve
DaVoiceMaster
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,159
And1: 2,456
Joined: Sep 26, 2003
Contact:
   

Re: Win now trade idea thread (Build around Dame!!) 

Post#194 » by DaVoiceMaster » Tue Jun 7, 2022 11:10 pm

I thought Zack Lavine used to be a good/decent defender. Did I dream that or what happened? If he played better defense, he might be a decent backcourt player with Lillard.
DaVoiceMaster
Senior Mod - Trail Blazers
12/27/2017 - 01/03/2018
Jsun947
Analyst
Posts: 3,626
And1: 450
Joined: Jan 02, 2007

Re: Win now trade idea thread (Build around Dame!!) 

Post#195 » by Jsun947 » Wed Jun 8, 2022 6:25 am

Bridges isn’t that good… I wouldn’t swap Simons for him.

Also this is the first I saw of him being a dumbass and I’ve never heard of lean until now. **** kids..
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,496
And1: 10,045
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Win now trade idea thread (Build around Dame!!) 

Post#196 » by BlazersBroncos » Thu Jun 9, 2022 12:02 am

Most recent semi-simple offseason:

Bledsoe + #7 for Collins - PDX gets a youngster that has upside and can ideally be #3 offensively to Dame / Ant
TPE for Kyle Anderson (S&T 12M AV) - PDX gets a versatile defender
TPE + Future NO SRP for David Nwaba - PDX gets another versatile defender
TP MLE to a C (Isaiah Hartenstein, JaVale Mcgee - in order of preference)
#36 on BPA

G - Damian Lillard / Anfernee Simons / Kris Dunn
G - Anfernee Simons / Josh Hart / Keon Johnson
F - Kyle Anderson / Nas Little / David Nwaba
F - John Collins / Justice Winslow / Greg Brown
C - Jusuf Nurkic / TP MLE / Trendon Watford

Assuming Dame is 25ppg, Ant 22ppg and Collins 20ppg + another 30ppg or so combined w/ Nurk + Hart you are looking at enough scoring and the rest of the rotation guys are + defenders who play hard and know their roles. Unlike Grant who may be looking at 25M+ in summer 2023, you get Collins locket up at 23, 25 and 26 for the next 3 years (Not a bad cost due to upside and IMO a high chance that he unlocks some game outside the pounding rock style of play Trae brings).
DaVoiceMaster
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,159
And1: 2,456
Joined: Sep 26, 2003
Contact:
   

Re: Win now trade idea thread (Build around Dame!!) 

Post#197 » by DaVoiceMaster » Fri Jun 10, 2022 2:32 am

Contest - winner gets bragging rights.

Can the Blazers find a starting SG, SF, PF, C and back-up PG and C with:

    $20,864,1988 TPE
    $6,519,792 TPE
    $3,261,480 TPE
    Bledsoe $19,375,000 contract (only $3.9M guaranteed)
    #7 Pick
    Simon's S&T
    Nurkic S&T
    Watford, Johnson, Louzada, Brown III
    Milwaukee 2025 Pick
    $10,264,000 MLE
    $4,017,000 BAE

Possible targets (but not limited to) - names I've heard/read about recently:

    John Collins
    OG Anunoby
    Obi Toppin
    Jerami Grant
    Miles Bridges
    Luguentz Dort
    Zack Lavine
    Bradley Beal
DaVoiceMaster
Senior Mod - Trail Blazers
12/27/2017 - 01/03/2018
Jsun947
Analyst
Posts: 3,626
And1: 450
Joined: Jan 02, 2007

Re: Win now trade idea thread (Build around Dame!!) 

Post#198 » by Jsun947 » Sat Jun 11, 2022 6:51 am

DaVoiceMaster wrote:Contest - winner gets bragging rights.

Can the Blazers find a starting SG, SF, PF, C and back-up PG and C with:

    $20,864,1988 TPE
    $6,519,792 TPE
    $3,261,480 TPE
    Bledsoe $19,375,000 contract (only $3.9M guaranteed)
    #7 Pick
    Simon's S&T
    Nurkic S&T
    Watford, Johnson, Louzada, Brown III
    Milwaukee 2025 Pick
    $10,264,000 MLE
    $4,017,000 BAE

Possible targets (but not limited to) - names I've heard/read about recently:

    John Collins
    OG Anunoby
    Obi Toppin
    Jerami Grant
    Miles Bridges
    Luguentz Dort
    Zack Lavine
    Bradley Beal



Bledsoe, Little, Mil 1st, #7 for Collins & #16
TPE, Brown & #16 for Grant
MLE for TJ Warren
BAE for Robin Lopez
Vet Min for Eubanks

Dame/Joseph
Simons/Hart/Johnson
Grant/Warren/Didi
Collins/Winslow/Watford
Nurkic/Lopez/Eubanks
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,477
And1: 8,186
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Win now trade idea thread (Build around Dame!!) 

Post#199 » by Wizenheimer » Sat Jun 11, 2022 4:24 pm

I see a lot of S&T ideas for guys like Simons and Bridges and Ayton, players headed for their rookie extensions. The reality is those trades are really difficult to accomplish because that is the one circumstance in the CBA that still attaches BYC restrictions

essentially the team signing, then trading a player only gets outgoing salary credit for 1/2 of the player's 1st year salary. Meanwhile, the team receiving the player accepts his full salary onto their cap. For instance, if Portland signs Ant for 20M, they are credited for trading 10M in salary; meaning the most salary they could take back is 15M. On the other hand, the team receiving Ant is taking on 20M so they have to send out a minimum of 15M. There aren't too many players in the NBA making exactly between 14.9M and 15.1M. Right now there is only one, Taurean Prince

so the trade has be be a bigger trade with a lot more salary involved in order to offset the BYC differential. The double S&T for Simons and Bridges would double the complication. If Bridges signed for 28M, that would be 28M incoming for Portland. Now, in the case of Simons at 20M, because of BYC he'd be 10M; add Bledsoe's 19.3M and Portland is sending out 29.3M. So Bridges would fit on Portland's end and the 125% rule would mean the Blazers could take as much as 36.7M back. But Charlotte would be sending out 14M in BYC salary with Bridges. But they'd be taking back 39.3M in salary in Simons + Bledsoe. So they have to send out a minimum of 31.5M. But if they add 15.5M in outgoing salary, Portland is taking back 43.5M which is 6.8M too much. It's an almost impossible puzzle to solve unless there is a 3rd team inviolved

but again, this BYC rule only apples to players on rookie scale contracts signing their 2nd contract

also: doing any S&T in July using picks in the draft 10 days from now is essentially impossible
Jsun947
Analyst
Posts: 3,626
And1: 450
Joined: Jan 02, 2007

Re: Win now trade idea thread (Build around Dame!!) 

Post#200 » by Jsun947 » Sat Jun 11, 2022 6:21 pm

Wizenheimer wrote:I see a lot of S&T ideas for guys like Simons and Bridges and Ayton, players headed for their rookie extensions. The reality is those trades are really difficult to accomplish because that is the one circumstance in the CBA that still attaches BYC restrictions

essentially the team signing, then trading a player only gets outgoing salary credit for 1/2 of the player's 1st year salary. Meanwhile, the team receiving the player accepts his full salary onto their cap. For instance, if Portland signs Ant for 20M, they are credited for trading 10M in salary; meaning the most salary they could take back is 15M. On the other hand, the team receiving Ant is taking on 20M so they have to send out a minimum of 15M. There aren't too many players in the NBA making exactly between 14.9M and 15.1M. Right now there is only one, Taurean Prince

so the trade has be be a bigger trade with a lot more salary involved in order to offset the BYC differential. The double S&T for Simons and Bridges would double the complication. If Bridges signed for 28M, that would be 28M incoming for Portland. Now, in the case of Simons at 20M, because of BYC he'd be 10M; add Bledsoe's 19.3M and Portland is sending out 29.3M. So Bridges would fit on Portland's end and the 125% rule would mean the Blazers could take as much as 36.7M back. But Charlotte would be sending out 14M in BYC salary with Bridges. But they'd be taking back 39.3M in salary in Simons + Bledsoe. So they have to send out a minimum of 31.5M. But if they add 15.5M in outgoing salary, Portland is taking back 43.5M which is 6.8M too much. It's an almost impossible puzzle to solve unless there is a 3rd team inviolved

but again, this BYC rule only apples to players on rookie scale contracts signing their 2nd contract

also: doing any S&T in July using picks in the draft 10 days from now is essentially impossible


The BYC thing is solved by teams being under the salary cap where they don't even need matching salary. That really limits the number of teams you can trade with though...

Return to Portland Trail Blazers