ImageImage

Larry Nance to Portland

Moderators: The Sebastian Express, Moonbeam, DeBlazerRiddem

User avatar
JasonStern
RealGM
Posts: 11,736
And1: 3,993
Joined: Dec 13, 2008
 

Re: Larry Nance to Portland 

Post#21 » by JasonStern » Fri Aug 27, 2021 6:27 pm

Myth wrote:
JasonStern wrote:
Myth wrote:
Pre-injury last season, CJ was absolutely playing like an all-star (all-nba really). Not sure if the injury knocked him down to earth or if he was going to come back down anyway, but he was great at that time. If he comes back in that form and Dame simultaneously plays great (he was underperforming while CJ was killing it), plus we have other capable role players, we don't need Simons/Little/Brown to be great. I'm not saying I'm expecting this, but the possibility is certain there.


And come playoff time, he was outplayed by Facundo Campazzo and Austin Rivers. Doesn't mean I'm going to overvalue Facundo Campazzo and Austin Rivers.

CJ's great play was a solid 12.5 games (until that injury halfway through a game) that were all consistently pretty great. My point is he has it in him to be an all-star level player.


One time, Damon Stoudamire put up 54 points. Another time, Andre Miller, who has no shot, put up 52. There is no doubt that CJ is capable of going off, but doing it for an entire season is far more unlikely.
Image
"I don't get timeouts. You're getting paid millions. Go do basketball things."
- Chauncey Billups
pinman42
Freshman
Posts: 56
And1: 17
Joined: Dec 15, 2011
   

Re: Larry Nance to Portland 

Post#22 » by pinman42 » Fri Aug 27, 2021 6:32 pm

Read on Twitter
Myth
General Manager
Posts: 9,996
And1: 8,646
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: Larry Nance to Portland 

Post#23 » by Myth » Fri Aug 27, 2021 6:45 pm

JasonStern wrote:
Myth wrote:
JasonStern wrote:
And come playoff time, he was outplayed by Facundo Campazzo and Austin Rivers. Doesn't mean I'm going to overvalue Facundo Campazzo and Austin Rivers.

CJ's great play was a solid 12.5 games (until that injury halfway through a game) that were all consistently pretty great. My point is he has it in him to be an all-star level player.


One time, Damon Stoudamire put up 54 points. Another time, Andre Miller, who has no shot, put up 52. There is no doubt that CJ is capable of going off, but doing it for an entire season is far more unlikely.

I don't know why your response is going with actually smaller and smaller sample sizes. I get it though, you have no faith in him.
HoopsFanAZ
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,371
And1: 317
Joined: Jun 16, 2008

Re: Larry Nance to Portland 

Post#24 » by HoopsFanAZ » Fri Aug 27, 2021 6:46 pm

For people who don't like the trade -- Nance, the lottery protected 1st -- I get the criticisms. Reasonable.

I love the trade. Nance Jr. -- I'm a fan. I even liked him with the Lakers. I don't like his missing that many games. The protected pick for a serious big (big and play big, not tall) in his prime? Done. Nurkic, Zeller, Nance. Better. Some help for RoCo doing the work.

Good luck, DJJ. I wish him the best.

Good job. A solid, slid-in-safe double for Olshey, IMHO. We'll see how it works out. [Yes, I like Markkanen but not much D from him, yet.] [The potential for Love in a buy out ... or even LMA would round it out fairly well.]

8-)
elias808
Junior
Posts: 316
And1: 317
Joined: Jul 31, 2015
 

Re: Larry Nance to Portland 

Post#25 » by elias808 » Fri Aug 27, 2021 6:51 pm

Soulyss wrote:
DusterBuster wrote:
elias808 wrote:Trading the FRP will come back to bite us once Dame leaves and we tank.


It’s protected and I would hope fully lottery protected forever to at least give some intelligence to this trade…. So not worried about it biting the Blazers in them losing a lottery pick. That said, Olshey is needlessly wasting an asset that could be used in a bigger trade, but he seems totally disinterested in even entertaining that as an option, so w/e I guess


I think this signals that Dame will absolutely be in Portland the rest of this year. Nance is a significant rotational upgrade over DJJ who was near unplayable.

I know some people are going to hate this, but don't be shocked to see a K-Love buyout where he lands in Portland. You can smell the collusion on this deal :P


I believe I read the protection on the pick is lottery till 2028. I just hate the idea of whenever Dame might leave, we are punting on the first year of the tank.
Myth
General Manager
Posts: 9,996
And1: 8,646
Joined: Oct 01, 2008
   

Re: Larry Nance to Portland 

Post#26 » by Myth » Fri Aug 27, 2021 6:58 pm

elias808 wrote:
Soulyss wrote:
DusterBuster wrote:
It’s protected and I would hope fully lottery protected forever to at least give some intelligence to this trade…. So not worried about it biting the Blazers in them losing a lottery pick. That said, Olshey is needlessly wasting an asset that could be used in a bigger trade, but he seems totally disinterested in even entertaining that as an option, so w/e I guess


I think this signals that Dame will absolutely be in Portland the rest of this year. Nance is a significant rotational upgrade over DJJ who was near unplayable.

I know some people are going to hate this, but don't be shocked to see a K-Love buyout where he lands in Portland. You can smell the collusion on this deal :P


I believe I read the protection on the pick is lottery till 2028. I just hate the idea of whenever Dame might leave, we are punting on the first year of the tank.

How are we punting the tank? If we tank and are in the lottery, we keep the pick. That is the point of the protection. If we make miss playoffs until 2028, it becomes a 2nd rounder. A single one at that. That is fantastic.
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 10,429
And1: 8,039
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Larry Nance to Portland 

Post#27 » by BlazersBroncos » Fri Aug 27, 2021 7:24 pm

I must be missing something, and maybe its just because its a year removed, but its astonishes me that the concensus last summer was that RoCo was easily worth 2 FRP while moving one for LNJ is being scoffed at.

People are going to realize very quickly that the difference between RoCo and LNJ isnt a FRP. Nance is a really, really good player.
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 33,466
And1: 19,052
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
   

Re: Larry Nance to Portland 

Post#28 » by DusterBuster » Fri Aug 27, 2021 7:27 pm

Soulyss wrote:
DusterBuster wrote:
elias808 wrote:Trading the FRP will come back to bite us once Dame leaves and we tank.


It’s protected and I would hope fully lottery protected forever to at least give some intelligence to this trade…. So not worried about it biting the Blazers in them losing a lottery pick. That said, Olshey is needlessly wasting an asset that could be used in a bigger trade, but he seems totally disinterested in even entertaining that as an option, so w/e I guess


I think this signals that Dame will absolutely be in Portland the rest of this year. Nance is a significant rotational upgrade over DJJ who was near unplayable.

I know some people are going to hate this, but don't be shocked to see a K-Love buyout where he lands in Portland. You can smell the collusion on this deal :P


If that's what this ends up in, I can lie to myself to consider it a decent trade. That said, not sure that's actually the case here, but we'll see.

I just hate seeing a trade asset like a FRP wasted in such a mediocre move if there isn't more behind the curtain with this move. Sure, Nance probably is an upgrade over Jones (who - btw - if he was so unplayable, why did the Blazers blow their MLE load on him last summer?...), but Nance is still a backup. He's not a starter. I just have such a hard time seeing how losing a decently valuable trade asset that could be used in a bigger trade is wise (again, gonna assume this is just it).

And yeah, I'm sure Dame stays in Portland all year... but my god... Olshey is doing absolutely f-all to convince Dame they can put a great roster around him this summer. It may work out in the ends, but jcf these are some uninspiring and downright wasteful looking deals right now.
Devilzsidewalk wrote:DB is like the ultimate Wolves troll
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 33,466
And1: 19,052
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
   

Re: Larry Nance to Portland 

Post#29 » by DusterBuster » Fri Aug 27, 2021 7:30 pm

Myth wrote:
elias808 wrote:
Soulyss wrote:
I think this signals that Dame will absolutely be in Portland the rest of this year. Nance is a significant rotational upgrade over DJJ who was near unplayable.

I know some people are going to hate this, but don't be shocked to see a K-Love buyout where he lands in Portland. You can smell the collusion on this deal :P


I believe I read the protection on the pick is lottery till 2028. I just hate the idea of whenever Dame might leave, we are punting on the first year of the tank.

How are we punting the tank? If we tank and are in the lottery, we keep the pick. That is the point of the protection. If we make miss playoffs until 2028, it becomes a 2nd rounder. A single one at that. That is fantastic.


Yeah, we don't know the full protection, but this is my assumption. Usually those picks that are full lottery protected until the final year just roll into being a 2nd rounder, not a fully unprotected pick. I would assuming (and pray) that Olshey wasn't too stupid to make sure that's how the protection works on the pick.

EDIT: Just saw the Woj tweet above. That's good at least. So yeah, not worried about losing a lottery pick to Cleveland because of this deal, but it's still an asset gone now.
Devilzsidewalk wrote:DB is like the ultimate Wolves troll
Norm2953
RealGM
Posts: 15,566
And1: 1,886
Joined: May 17, 2003
Location: Oregon

Re: Larry Nance to Portland 

Post#30 » by Norm2953 » Fri Aug 27, 2021 7:30 pm

It'd be interesting to know if this puts this over the tax line but then again they have until the trade
deadline to duck under the line. Team likely is still not done for they still lack a classic 3/D SF and
now have Roco, Nance and Little similar players
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 10,429
And1: 8,039
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Larry Nance to Portland 

Post#31 » by BlazersBroncos » Fri Aug 27, 2021 7:41 pm

Norm2953 wrote:It'd be interesting to know if this puts this over the tax line but then again they have until the trade
deadline to duck under the line. Team likely is still not done for they still lack a classic 3/D SF and
now have Roco, Nance and Little similar players


The 'classic 3/D SF' is probably the most saught after player archetype right now after the 'star' player. If Robert Covington is now considered a PF, then there are about 8-10 starting caliber 'classic 3/D SF' players in this league. Probably less.

The biggest thing this move does is allow us to run CJ as the 6th man. I think he is mature enough to handle that, and the way it balances the team would be huge.

G - Damian Lillard (34) / CJ McCollum (14)
G - Norman Powell (15) / CJ McCollum (18) / Anfernee Simons (15)
F - Robert Covington (18) / Norman Powell (15) / Tony Snell (15)
F - Larry Nance Jr (30) / Robert Covington (12) / Nassir Little or Greg Brown (6)
C - Jusuf Nurkic (28) / Cody Zeller (20)

The SL is far more balanced, with way better defense and enough scoring outside Dame IMO. Then you have the best 6th man in the league in CJ, who can create for himself and others while being the primary ballhandler off the bench. Then you have designated 3PT shooters in Simons and Snell off the bench and Zeller to set the Kanter screens but play better defense (And rebound/score less effeciently). They still get a quarter or so worth of 3 guard ball a game, which is an amount that I think works in our favor to keep the opposition off balanced, but its also giving us 3/4ths of the game of non-small-ball, which is how you win when it matters.

IDK, I might just be in a good mood but of the realistic options avaliable this is about as good a move as I can think of.
skywalker33
Nuggets Forum Mock Draft Champ
Posts: 13,767
And1: 5,277
Joined: Jun 02, 2014
       

Re: Larry Nance to Portland 

Post#32 » by skywalker33 » Fri Aug 27, 2021 8:38 pm

Sounds like you just paved the way for CLE to get Markkanen, hope you got big-time protections on that 1st. IMO, Nance isn't even worth that by himself. Good Luck with that.
Texas Chuck wrote:I'd like to see Utah, and Denver lose


Exactly as I've been saying all along !!
User avatar
kumquat
Starter
Posts: 2,450
And1: 63
Joined: May 25, 2006

Re: Larry Nance to Portland 

Post#33 » by kumquat » Fri Aug 27, 2021 8:48 pm

Definitely a move that needed to be made to fill a Power Forward spot, so roster wise not the worst move. I think this is a TBD could turn out to be a great move, could turn out to be an average move.
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 33,466
And1: 19,052
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
   

Re: Larry Nance to Portland 

Post#34 » by DusterBuster » Fri Aug 27, 2021 8:50 pm

skywalker33 wrote:Sounds like you just paved the way for CLE to get Markkanen, hope you got big-time protections on that 1st. IMO, Nance isn't even worth that by himself. Good Luck with that.


Woj posted the protection, full lottery protection and rolls into a 2nd rounder if not conveyed. But yeah... Why didn't the Blazers just take Markkanen for themselves? More upside, not as good a defender, but at least still has some good potential left. The only thing the Bulls didn't get from POR was a meaningless 2nd rounder they could have easily supplied. I guess with S&T's it depends if Markkanen wanted to come to Portland in the first place, but still... Can't imagine he wouldn't have picked Portland with Dame over Cleveland with Depression if those were his two options...
Devilzsidewalk wrote:DB is like the ultimate Wolves troll
KuruptedCav
Analyst
Posts: 3,043
And1: 1,126
Joined: Dec 15, 2004

Re: Larry Nance to Portland 

Post#35 » by KuruptedCav » Fri Aug 27, 2021 9:00 pm

You guys are going to love LNJ. On the court: He is an excellent defender, athletic, plays selfless basketball and does all the little things that contribute to winning basketball. He has been injury plagued (though part of that was the Cavs playing for picks) and does have to manage his Crohn’s disease, but he’ll plug and play well.

Off the court, you are getting someone who will be active, generous, and will never make headlines for anything negative. Last year he made headlines by donating.

As a Cavs fan, we’re disappointed that he’s leaving and disappointed in the trade. But, happy he’s going to a team that’s poised to win, has great fans, and will appreciate him.

Go Blazers.


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
monopoman
RealGM
Posts: 12,398
And1: 6,253
Joined: Nov 11, 2009
     

Re: Larry Nance to Portland 

Post#36 » by monopoman » Fri Aug 27, 2021 9:13 pm

I mean this pick is lottery protected every single year, and becomes a 2028 second if it never conveys.

So if Dame really does demand out and we end up trading him and the other older players, this pick could theoretically be a second round pick in 2028.
Brandon-Clyde
RealGM
Posts: 22,758
And1: 5,660
Joined: May 29, 2008
     

Re: Larry Nance to Portland 

Post#37 » by Brandon-Clyde » Fri Aug 27, 2021 9:14 pm

DusterBuster wrote:
skywalker33 wrote:Sounds like you just paved the way for CLE to get Markkanen, hope you got big-time protections on that 1st. IMO, Nance isn't even worth that by himself. Good Luck with that.


Woj posted the protection, full lottery protection and rolls into a 2nd rounder if not conveyed. But yeah... Why didn't the Blazers just take Markkanen for themselves? More upside, not as good a defender, but at least still has some good potential left. The only thing the Bulls didn't get from POR was a meaningless 2nd rounder they could have easily supplied. I guess with S&T's it depends if Markkanen wanted to come to Portland in the first place, but still... Can't imagine he wouldn't have picked Portland with Dame over Cleveland with Depression if those were his two options...

Markannen will earn almost $7 million more than Nance this coming season. Portland would have had to add more salary meaning adding Simons and possibly Ellerby for salary matching purposes.
There are no constraints on the human mind, no walls around the human spirit, no barriers to our progress except those we ourselves erect." -- Ronald Reagan
User avatar
kumquat
Starter
Posts: 2,450
And1: 63
Joined: May 25, 2006

Re: Larry Nance to Portland 

Post#38 » by kumquat » Fri Aug 27, 2021 9:30 pm

Nance vs Embiid defensive highlights
User avatar
monopoman
RealGM
Posts: 12,398
And1: 6,253
Joined: Nov 11, 2009
     

Re: Larry Nance to Portland 

Post#39 » by monopoman » Fri Aug 27, 2021 10:16 pm

Impressive defense against one of the best big men in the league.
User avatar
JasonStern
RealGM
Posts: 11,736
And1: 3,993
Joined: Dec 13, 2008
 

Re: Larry Nance to Portland 

Post#40 » by JasonStern » Fri Aug 27, 2021 10:26 pm

DusterBuster wrote:Sure, Nance probably is an upgrade over Jones (who - btw - if he was so unplayable, why did the Blazers blow their MLE load on him last summer?...)


Because Chandler Parsons turned us down. :(
Image
"I don't get timeouts. You're getting paid millions. Go do basketball things."
- Chauncey Billups

Return to Portland Trail Blazers