ImageImage

LIVE - Board Competition - Blazers Off-Season Plan

Moderators: Moonbeam, DeBlazerRiddem

User avatar
TGW
RealGM
Posts: 13,362
And1: 6,732
Joined: Oct 22, 2010

Re: LIVE - Board Competition - Blazers Off-Season Plan 

Post#21 » by TGW » Mon Jun 3, 2024 1:39 pm

Norm2953 wrote:Agreed, the Wizards board is laughing there is a thread about trading Deni.


It's not that Avidja is untradeable. It's just that people think the Wizards would trade him for a poopoo platter of bench players and a mediocre pick (i.e. the trade above) out of desperation. We get it...the Wizards suck, but it doesn't mean they're just giving away good players just because.
Some random troll wrote:Not to sound negative, but this team is owned by an arrogant cheapskate, managed by a moron and coached by an idiot. Recipe for disaster.
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,435
And1: 9,998
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: LIVE - Board Competition - Blazers Off-Season Plan 

Post#22 » by BlazersBroncos » Mon Jun 3, 2024 1:40 pm

Norm2953 wrote:Agreed, the Wizards board is laughing there is a thread about trading Deni.


Ya - I think OKC could dramatically beat this offer (Giddey + 12 + 2025 MIA FRP + another future FRP) and I still am not sure WAS would do it.

Deni is a 2 way forward with great size, great rebounding, above average passing, a great motor, a connector who doesnt overdribble and moves the ball quickly, still quite young and on a top-5 contract in the league (15.6M / 14.3M / 13.1M / 11.8M) - the only real question is whether the shooting sticks.

He is tremendously valuable. In terms of draft pick value, if he was on the Blazers I wouldnt trade him for anything outside the Top-2 picks in this draft.
Walton1one
Starter
Posts: 2,262
And1: 1,262
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: LIVE - Board Competition - Blazers Off-Season Plan 

Post#23 » by Walton1one » Mon Jun 3, 2024 11:01 pm

Norm2953 wrote:Agreed, the Wizards board is laughing there is a thread about trading Deni.


1) I did not come up with the Avdija to POR trade, that was a rumor provided by another poster, who just said there were discussions. Discussions do not = deal imminent, nor were the "details" of the trade revealed, just some of the major moving parts

2) I don't think we should be leaning on the opinion of WAS fans who clearly overvalue Avdija (hello POR fans\Simons), as in that same thread was proposed Deni & #26 for the #1 pick....or SA giving up a 2025 1st to move up a few spots, neither of those are realistic IMO.

3) I do not think an end of the lottery pick (#14), Cole Anthony & Jabari Walker is a "poopoo platter" for a player who had not really shown much until this year, where he took a nice step forward. A lot IMO depends on IF WAS values a player at\around #14 (Carter, Collier, McCain, Ware) that they know will not be there at #26, something that seems to get overlooked in this conversation.

It sure APPEARS that WAS will be taking Risacher, who plays the same position as Avdija. So moving off of Avdija for some better complementary talent makes sense. Both Anthony & Walker at least fill some rotational roles for WAS.

Again, it maybe? has been discussed, which means, likely not happening, but sort of 3-team deal like this IS at least in the realm of possibility IMO.
Walton1one
Starter
Posts: 2,262
And1: 1,262
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: LIVE - Board Competition - Blazers Off-Season Plan 

Post#24 » by Walton1one » Mon Jun 3, 2024 11:05 pm

BlazersBroncos wrote:
Norm2953 wrote:Agreed, the Wizards board is laughing there is a thread about trading Deni.


Ya - I think OKC could dramatically beat this offer (Giddey + 12 + 2025 MIA FRP + another future FRP) and I still am not sure WAS would do it.


THREE first round picks for Avdija? (+ Giddey!!). Uh, no I do not see that happening....Love to see what the OKC board would have to say about that... Respectfully disagree here.
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,435
And1: 9,998
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: LIVE - Board Competition - Blazers Off-Season Plan 

Post#25 » by BlazersBroncos » Mon Jun 3, 2024 11:56 pm

Deni averaged 19, 9 and 4 over the 2nd half of his year 23 season while playing + defense and having a contract that declines all the way down to 11.5M by his final year.

I would argue that to many if not most teams Deni is seen as more valuable than both Scoot and Sharpe.
zzaj
General Manager
Posts: 9,146
And1: 3,687
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
 

Re: LIVE - Board Competition - Blazers Off-Season Plan 

Post#26 » by zzaj » Tue Jun 4, 2024 11:18 pm

I know it's insane...but anybody else kinda, weirdly sad that JJ Redick isn't going to be coaching the Blazers?
DaVoiceMaster
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,115
And1: 2,418
Joined: Sep 26, 2003
Contact:
   

Re: LIVE - Board Competition - Blazers Off-Season Plan 

Post#27 » by DaVoiceMaster » Tue Jun 4, 2024 11:30 pm

Butter wrote:
DeBlazerRiddem wrote:
Butter wrote:Portland Trades
Matisse Thybulle

Portland Receives
Evan Fournier ($19M expiring)

Why for Portland? Salary dump. Fournier's contract is a Team Option next year. The Blazers can keep him for a veteran mentor, OR cut him loose for cap relief. I really wanted to pull the Mavs pick to the Blazers, but sent it to the Pistons to make this deal happen.


FWIW I think they closed this loophole a few years ago. If you trade for a player with an option you basically have to pick it up now. We could have done at the trade deadline but just not during summer. Detroit seems to be getting the better player and the pick which is just a great deal for them, I think if we have to eat Fournier's last team option year while giving up Thybulle+Williams we should be demanding that pick.


DVM - good catch, and thanks for the input. Without Fournier coming off this season, the Blazers cap savings are minimal this year, but pretty substantial next season.


You give me too much credit!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:
DaVoiceMaster
Senior Mod - Trail Blazers
12/27/2017 - 01/03/2018
User avatar
JasonStern
RealGM
Posts: 12,235
And1: 4,284
Joined: Dec 13, 2008
 

Re: LIVE - Board Competition - Blazers Off-Season Plan 

Post#28 » by JasonStern » Wed Jun 5, 2024 7:43 pm

POR trades: Simons
POR receives: future 1st, filler
Future pick for a veteran young enough to keep on our core

POR trades: Grant
POR receives: protected 1st, filler
Future pick for a veteran

POR trades: Brogdon
POR receives: protected 1st, filler
Future pick for a veteran

POR trades: Ayton
POR receives: expirings
Remove a veteran big young enough for the rebuild to free up cap space we won't use

POR trades: Williams
POR receives: TPE
Remove a veteran big young enough for the rebuild to free up cap space we won't use

POR trades: Thybulle
POR receives: 2 future 2nds
Future picks for a veteran

POR trades: Scoot
POR receives: Future 1st
Cash out on Scoot, who can't shoot

POR trades: Sharpe
POR receives: Future 1st
Cash out on Sharpe, who people who have never met him says he has no work ethic

POR trades: Murray
POR receives: Future 2nd
Cash out on Murray, who underperformed

POR trades: Banton
POR receives: Cash considerations
Frees up minutes

POR trades: Reath
POR receives: Future Protected 2nd
Frees up minutes, get a pick

POR trades: Walker
POR receives: Future Protected 2nd
Frees up minutes, get a pick

POR trades: Camara
POR receeives: Future Protected 2nd

POR trades: Rupert
POR receives: Cash considerations
Cash out on Rupert

End roster (g-league stats):
Ashton Hagans - 13.5p 5.0r 10.5a
D'Moi Hodge - 15.0p 5.8r 1.0a
Taze Moore - 19.0p 6.5r 7.5a
Kevin Knox - 21.0p 8.0r 2.0a
G. Conditt IV - 11.4p 8.8r 2.0a

Am I doing this right? Is this what everyone wants? A g-league team but with a bunch of picks that are unlikely to pan out and a bunch of cap space to land the next Festus Ezeli?
Because love can burn like a cigarette.
And leave you left with nothing.
Leave you left with nothing.
DaVoiceMaster
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,115
And1: 2,418
Joined: Sep 26, 2003
Contact:
   

Re: LIVE - Board Competition - Blazers Off-Season Plan 

Post#29 » by DaVoiceMaster » Sun Jun 9, 2024 12:59 am

Trade #1

Portland trades: Brogdon, RWIII, Rupert, 2024 #7 pick
Houston Trades: Eason, Whitmore, Brooks, 2024 #3 pick
Why? Houston is in win-now mode. Usoka knows both players coming in. Portland takes on Brooks contract which explains the pick swap, but moves up to grab the player they want.

----------------------
Trade #2

Portland trades: Simons, Thybulle
Orlando trades: Black, Anthony, Denver 2025 pick
Why: Orlando needs exactly what Simons and Thybulle provide. Portland gets a couple of rookies to build with.

---------------------
Trade #3

Portland trades: Grant, Camara, 2024 #13 pick, #34 pick
Detroit trades: Fournier, 2024 #5 pick
Why: Detroit is rumored to be interested in Grant and possibly okay moving back in the draft. Portland moves up in the draft (nothing more).

#3 Pick - Donovan Clingan
#5 Pick - Stephon Castle
#40 Pick - Ajay Mitchell - two way contract

Buyout - Fournier

PG - Henderson / Anthony / Mitchell
SG - Sharpe / Whitmore / Castle
SF - Black / Banton / Murray
PF - Eason / Walker / Brooks
_C - Ayton / Clingan / Reath

Coach - Billups (one more year)
DaVoiceMaster
Senior Mod - Trail Blazers
12/27/2017 - 01/03/2018
User avatar
Pattycakes
General Manager
Posts: 8,662
And1: 2,310
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Contact:
     

Re: LIVE - Board Competition - Blazers Off-Season Plan 

Post#30 » by Pattycakes » Sun Jun 9, 2024 2:08 pm

JasonStern wrote:POR trades: Simons
POR receives: future 1st, filler
Future pick for a veteran young enough to keep on our core

POR trades: Grant
POR receives: protected 1st, filler
Future pick for a veteran

POR trades: Brogdon
POR receives: protected 1st, filler
Future pick for a veteran

POR trades: Ayton
POR receives: expirings
Remove a veteran big young enough for the rebuild to free up cap space we won't use

POR trades: Williams
POR receives: TPE
Remove a veteran big young enough for the rebuild to free up cap space we won't use

POR trades: Thybulle
POR receives: 2 future 2nds
Future picks for a veteran

POR trades: Scoot
POR receives: Future 1st
Cash out on Scoot, who can't shoot

POR trades: Sharpe
POR receives: Future 1st
Cash out on Sharpe, who people who have never met him says he has no work ethic

POR trades: Murray
POR receives: Future 2nd
Cash out on Murray, who underperformed

POR trades: Banton
POR receives: Cash considerations
Frees up minutes

POR trades: Reath
POR receives: Future Protected 2nd
Frees up minutes, get a pick

POR trades: Walker
POR receives: Future Protected 2nd
Frees up minutes, get a pick

POR trades: Camara
POR receeives: Future Protected 2nd

POR trades: Rupert
POR receives: Cash considerations
Cash out on Rupert

End roster (g-league stats):
Ashton Hagans - 13.5p 5.0r 10.5a
D'Moi Hodge - 15.0p 5.8r 1.0a
Taze Moore - 19.0p 6.5r 7.5a
Kevin Knox - 21.0p 8.0r 2.0a
G. Conditt IV - 11.4p 8.8r 2.0a

Am I doing this right? Is this what everyone wants? A g-league team but with a bunch of picks that are unlikely to pan out and a bunch of cap space to land the next Festus Ezeli?


If the goal is to undersell all of our young guys and manage to get even worse, than yes David Kahn you have performed well in this mock.
Somewhere trying not to offend Texas Chuck.
User avatar
JasonStern
RealGM
Posts: 12,235
And1: 4,284
Joined: Dec 13, 2008
 

Re: LIVE - Board Competition - Blazers Off-Season Plan 

Post#31 » by JasonStern » Sun Jun 9, 2024 10:25 pm

Pattycakes wrote:
JasonStern wrote:POR trades: Simons
POR receives: future 1st, filler
Future pick for a veteran young enough to keep on our core

POR trades: Grant
POR receives: protected 1st, filler
Future pick for a veteran

POR trades: Brogdon
POR receives: protected 1st, filler
Future pick for a veteran

POR trades: Ayton
POR receives: expirings
Remove a veteran big young enough for the rebuild to free up cap space we won't use

POR trades: Williams
POR receives: TPE
Remove a veteran big young enough for the rebuild to free up cap space we won't use

POR trades: Thybulle
POR receives: 2 future 2nds
Future picks for a veteran

POR trades: Scoot
POR receives: Future 1st
Cash out on Scoot, who can't shoot

POR trades: Sharpe
POR receives: Future 1st
Cash out on Sharpe, who people who have never met him says he has no work ethic

POR trades: Murray
POR receives: Future 2nd
Cash out on Murray, who underperformed

POR trades: Banton
POR receives: Cash considerations
Frees up minutes

POR trades: Reath
POR receives: Future Protected 2nd
Frees up minutes, get a pick

POR trades: Walker
POR receives: Future Protected 2nd
Frees up minutes, get a pick

POR trades: Camara
POR receeives: Future Protected 2nd

POR trades: Rupert
POR receives: Cash considerations
Cash out on Rupert

End roster (g-league stats):
Ashton Hagans - 13.5p 5.0r 10.5a
D'Moi Hodge - 15.0p 5.8r 1.0a
Taze Moore - 19.0p 6.5r 7.5a
Kevin Knox - 21.0p 8.0r 2.0a
G. Conditt IV - 11.4p 8.8r 2.0a

Am I doing this right? Is this what everyone wants? A g-league team but with a bunch of picks that are unlikely to pan out and a bunch of cap space to land the next Festus Ezeli?


If the goal is to undersell all of our young guys and manage to get even worse, than yes David Kahn you have performed well in this mock.


It seems like we're at the point in the rebuild where everyone forgets this is a for-profit team, pin-points every potential flaw any player has - only to overvalue them in trades, and massively overvalues the possible potential of future draft picks. I feel like my off-season plan maximizes this irrational thought process.

Laugh now, but if we trade Simons for a future 1st, we might be lucky enough in the draft to land the next Anfernee Simons.
Because love can burn like a cigarette.
And leave you left with nothing.
Leave you left with nothing.
Butter
General Manager
Posts: 8,756
And1: 409
Joined: Aug 14, 2002
Location: Youth movement, here we come
 

Re: LIVE - Board Competition - Blazers Off-Season Plan 

Post#32 » by Butter » Sun Jun 9, 2024 10:32 pm

JasonStern wrote:
Pattycakes wrote:
JasonStern wrote:POR trades: Simons
POR receives: future 1st, filler
Future pick for a veteran young enough to keep on our core

POR trades: Grant
POR receives: protected 1st, filler
Future pick for a veteran

POR trades: Brogdon
POR receives: protected 1st, filler
Future pick for a veteran

POR trades: Ayton
POR receives: expirings
Remove a veteran big young enough for the rebuild to free up cap space we won't use

POR trades: Williams
POR receives: TPE
Remove a veteran big young enough for the rebuild to free up cap space we won't use

POR trades: Thybulle
POR receives: 2 future 2nds
Future picks for a veteran

POR trades: Scoot
POR receives: Future 1st
Cash out on Scoot, who can't shoot

POR trades: Sharpe
POR receives: Future 1st
Cash out on Sharpe, who people who have never met him says he has no work ethic

POR trades: Murray
POR receives: Future 2nd
Cash out on Murray, who underperformed

POR trades: Banton
POR receives: Cash considerations
Frees up minutes

POR trades: Reath
POR receives: Future Protected 2nd
Frees up minutes, get a pick

POR trades: Walker
POR receives: Future Protected 2nd
Frees up minutes, get a pick

POR trades: Camara
POR receeives: Future Protected 2nd

POR trades: Rupert
POR receives: Cash considerations
Cash out on Rupert

End roster (g-league stats):
Ashton Hagans - 13.5p 5.0r 10.5a
D'Moi Hodge - 15.0p 5.8r 1.0a
Taze Moore - 19.0p 6.5r 7.5a
Kevin Knox - 21.0p 8.0r 2.0a
G. Conditt IV - 11.4p 8.8r 2.0a

Am I doing this right? Is this what everyone wants? A g-league team but with a bunch of picks that are unlikely to pan out and a bunch of cap space to land the next Festus Ezeli?


If the goal is to undersell all of our young guys and manage to get even worse, than yes David Kahn you have performed well in this mock.


It seems like we're at the point in the rebuild where everyone forgets this is a for-profit team, pin-points every potential flaw any player has - only to overvalue them in trades, and massively overvalues the possible potential of future draft picks. I feel like my off-season plan maximizes this irrational thought process.

Laugh now, but if we trade Simons for a future 1st, we might be lucky enough in the draft to land the next Anfernee Simons.


Acknowledging your point, but the bottom line is that when the Blazers traded Dame, they dumped any hope of winning play off series's. This team had too bad of a record to be at the salary apron.

Simons and Grant are good players, butbI just don't believe those salaries match the teams current timeline to be competitive.
Rip City, baby!!!!
User avatar
JasonStern
RealGM
Posts: 12,235
And1: 4,284
Joined: Dec 13, 2008
 

Re: LIVE - Board Competition - Blazers Off-Season Plan 

Post#33 » by JasonStern » Sun Jun 9, 2024 10:40 pm

Butter wrote:Acknowledging your point, but the bottom line is that when the Blazers traded Dame, they dumped any hope of winning play off series's. This team had too bad of a record to be at the salary apron.

Simons and Grant are good players, butbI just don't believe those salaries match the teams current timeline to be competitive.


Simons is 25 and is on a reasonable contract. If you don't think the Blazers can rebuild in the next 5 years, we have bigger problems than Simons on the roster.

Jerami Grant I completely admit makes no sense. Like I really get keeping Brogon to mentor Scoot. But Grant is a win-now piece on a lose-now roster that doesn't seem to fill a veteran presence. Maybe if we take some wings in the draft that changes.
Because love can burn like a cigarette.
And leave you left with nothing.
Leave you left with nothing.
Butter
General Manager
Posts: 8,756
And1: 409
Joined: Aug 14, 2002
Location: Youth movement, here we come
 

Re: LIVE - Board Competition - Blazers Off-Season Plan 

Post#34 » by Butter » Sun Jun 9, 2024 10:56 pm

JasonStern wrote:
Butter wrote:Acknowledging your point, but the bottom line is that when the Blazers traded Dame, they dumped any hope of winning play off series's. This team had too bad of a record to be at the salary apron.

Simons and Grant are good players, butbI just don't believe those salaries match the teams current timeline to be competitive.


Simons is 25 and is on a reasonable contract. If you don't think the Blazers can rebuild in the next 5 years, we have bigger problems than Simons on the roster.

Jerami Grant I completely admit makes no sense. Like I really get keeping Brogon to mentor Scoot. But Grant is a win-now piece on a lose-now roster that doesn't seem to fill a veteran presence. Maybe if we take some wings in the draft that changes.


To me, it's two separate issues. If Simons was committed to being a 6th man super sub, OR if he was a 6'8" wing with a similar skill set, then fine. The Blazers can't play him next to Scoot, and he's blocking Sharpe.

But to your point, he is a reasonable contract with value, so I'm proposing trading him to regain value and even out the roster.
Rip City, baby!!!!
User avatar
JasonStern
RealGM
Posts: 12,235
And1: 4,284
Joined: Dec 13, 2008
 

Re: LIVE - Board Competition - Blazers Off-Season Plan 

Post#35 » by JasonStern » Sun Jun 9, 2024 11:09 pm

Butter wrote:
JasonStern wrote:
Butter wrote:Acknowledging your point, but the bottom line is that when the Blazers traded Dame, they dumped any hope of winning play off series's. This team had too bad of a record to be at the salary apron.

Simons and Grant are good players, butbI just don't believe those salaries match the teams current timeline to be competitive.


Simons is 25 and is on a reasonable contract. If you don't think the Blazers can rebuild in the next 5 years, we have bigger problems than Simons on the roster.

Jerami Grant I completely admit makes no sense. Like I really get keeping Brogon to mentor Scoot. But Grant is a win-now piece on a lose-now roster that doesn't seem to fill a veteran presence. Maybe if we take some wings in the draft that changes.


To me, it's two separate issues. If Simons was committed to being a 6th man super sub, OR if he was a 6'8" wing with a similar skill set, then fine. The Blazers can't play him next to Scoot, and he's blocking Sharpe.

But to your point, he is a reasonable contract with value, so I'm proposing trading him to regain value and even out the roster.


The problem with your view is that you think that Scoot/Sharpe are legit NBA starters. As flawed as a Brogdon/Simons back court is, it is the best chance to actually play competitive basketball at a professional level. I am the biggest Sharpe fan on RealGM. But I also accept the fact that players take time to develop, and having mentors train them daily is more valuable than throwing them out against the best players in the world 82 times in a competitive environment and expecting them to magically learn.

That said, I'm not opposed to trading Brogdon or Simons. The return just has to make sense. A 2032 Clippers pick that might convey as two 2nd round picks or expire really doesn't excite me, especially at a time when the morale for the team in general is rather bad.

And whether people accept it or not, we are in year 3 of a rebuild that has shown zero success.
"NUH UH! DAME SCORED A BUNCH OF POINTS!"
And that landed us a lotto pick in Sharpe, a top 3 pick in Scoot, and two lotto picks in this draft. We are either farther in the rebuild than you want to admit, or we are horribly mismanaged. But any "we're year one into a rebuild" claims clearly show that you haven't paid attention to the team. To miss the play-in with Dame's best statistical season...
Because love can burn like a cigarette.
And leave you left with nothing.
Leave you left with nothing.
DaVoiceMaster
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,115
And1: 2,418
Joined: Sep 26, 2003
Contact:
   

Re: LIVE - Board Competition - Blazers Off-Season Plan 

Post#36 » by DaVoiceMaster » Tue Jun 11, 2024 1:14 am

The Blazers have been rebuilding since Aldridge left and they got rid of everyone else. I'm tired of small guards that can shoot but can't play defense. Lillard produced a ton so you can live with it and he at least played "some" defense. CJ produced rather well and we overlooked his flaws for a number of years. One is fine, but both together isn't good enough. Then came Simon's and the 3 of them together was just bad. Now that 2 are gone, I'm ready to be done with Simon's, as well. I'm not saying he is bad, but I'm ready for a change. That's not to say Scoot and Sharpe are the answer cuz the jury is still out. I'd move Simon's, Grant, Brogdon, Timelord, and Thybulle for young talent and better/future picks.
DaVoiceMaster
Senior Mod - Trail Blazers
12/27/2017 - 01/03/2018
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,435
And1: 9,998
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: LIVE - Board Competition - Blazers Off-Season Plan 

Post#37 » by BlazersBroncos » Tue Jun 11, 2024 1:53 am

DaVoiceMaster wrote:The Blazers have been rebuilding since Aldridge left and they got rid of everyone else. I'm tired of small guards that can shoot but can't play defense. Lillard produced a to. So you can live with it and he at least played some defense. CJ produced rather well and we overlooked his flaws for a number of years. One is fine, but both together isn't good enough. Then came Simon's and the 3 of them together was bad. Now that 2 are gone, I'm ready to be done with Simon's, as well. I'm not saying he is bad, but I'm ready for a change. That's not to say Scoot and Sharpe are the answer cuz the jury is still out. I'd move Simon's, Grant, Brogdon, Timelord, and Thybulle for young talent and better/future picks.


I think we need some vets, just not this many.

Trade Simons and Grant.
Keep Brogdan and Thybulle.
Rebuild RWIII’s value and hope a team overpays at the DL. (Especially like this 1/2 season of RW idea if we draft a big at 14. Let them sit and learn a bit then cash RW and slide the rook to C2 behind Ayton).
zzaj
General Manager
Posts: 9,146
And1: 3,687
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
 

Re: LIVE - Board Competition - Blazers Off-Season Plan 

Post#38 » by zzaj » Tue Jun 11, 2024 2:32 am

The point is not that Simons is some kind of bad basketball player.

The point is you can relatively easily get 80% (or more) of what Simons brings to an NBA team for 1/4 of the pricetag—and THAT is better for a rebuilding team.
zzaj
General Manager
Posts: 9,146
And1: 3,687
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
 

Re: LIVE - Board Competition - Blazers Off-Season Plan 

Post#39 » by zzaj » Tue Jun 11, 2024 3:46 pm

I'm not going to pretend to have any guess at what the offseason is really going to look like...but I hope beyond hopes that Scoot and Sharpe are looking at the level of defensive awareness, connectedness and effectiveness that Jrue and White are committed to, and taking notes.
Norm2953
RealGM
Posts: 16,485
And1: 2,222
Joined: May 17, 2003
Location: Oregon

Re: LIVE - Board Competition - Blazers Off-Season Plan 

Post#40 » by Norm2953 » Tue Jun 11, 2024 4:21 pm

As we have seen with the Pistons, who have drafted fifth several times in a row, tearing the team
down to its roots isn't going to work unless one can see a franchise player on the horizon.

I do think the thing to do to have a plan to how the team wishes to play. If the team builds around
Scoot/SS, what does the team need to add in order to win with these players?

Return to Portland Trail Blazers