ImageImage

2025 Blazer Draft Prospects

Moderators: DeBlazerRiddem, Moonbeam

dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 33,309
And1: 18,875
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: 2025 Blazer Draft Prospects 

Post#281 » by dckingsfan » Mon Mar 31, 2025 5:11 pm

tester551 wrote:
Blazers20 wrote:Does Essengue have superstar potential? Does anyone else see a young Giannis in Essengue, he’s long, pretty athletic and finishes above the rim. Essengue is a player you roll the dice on and hope he can become something special. I also see a little Batum in him as well.

Essengue is my favorite prospect in the 8-16 range, but I don't see Giannis at all.

Giannis had a very good handle and PG skills in the youth leagues he was in. I see Noa as having more of a Aldridge type impact (without LMA's stupid inefficient mid-range turnaround jumper). I think Noa can be a very good player... potentially a fringe all-star level.

I think if you really want Essengue, you will be able to trade down (potentially) with Brooklyn. 9th pick for Brooklyn's 17 & 26.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 33,309
And1: 18,875
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: 2025 Blazer Draft Prospects 

Post#282 » by dckingsfan » Mon Mar 31, 2025 5:17 pm

If we do get the first pick - duh.

Second pick also a duh.

If we get the third or fourth pick, I would like to see Edgecombe. I think he would fit in nicely next to Deni/Camara/Clingan where this team hangs its collective hat on D. His 3-point shot from the corner is fine although he isn't going to be the creator of someone like Harper.

Still, that wouldn't be a bad upgrade on the defensive end, IMO. And unlike Sharpe, he wants to take it to the basket.
tester551
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,402
And1: 1,174
Joined: Jan 10, 2005
Location: Missing the Coast & Trees

Re: 2025 Blazer Draft Prospects 

Post#283 » by tester551 » Mon Mar 31, 2025 5:32 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
tester551 wrote:
Blazers20 wrote:Does Essengue have superstar potential? Does anyone else see a young Giannis in Essengue, he’s long, pretty athletic and finishes above the rim. Essengue is a player you roll the dice on and hope he can become something special. I also see a little Batum in him as well.

Essengue is my favorite prospect in the 8-16 range, but I don't see Giannis at all.

Giannis had a very good handle and PG skills in the youth leagues he was in. I see Noa as having more of a Aldridge type impact (without LMA's stupid inefficient mid-range turnaround jumper). I think Noa can be a very good player... potentially a fringe all-star level.

I think if you really want Essengue, you will be able to trade down (potentially) with Brooklyn. 9th pick for Brooklyn's 17 & 26.

Trade down would be awesome, and ideal IMO.

Brooklyn at 17 might be too far down though.
Atlanta at 13/24 or Orlando at 15/25 would be much better... even if Portland had to throw a 2nd or two in (or a player).

Top pick would be Essengue
Second pick would be Clifford or Sergio.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 33,309
And1: 18,875
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: 2025 Blazer Draft Prospects 

Post#284 » by dckingsfan » Mon Mar 31, 2025 6:40 pm

tester551 wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:
tester551 wrote:Essengue is my favorite prospect in the 8-16 range, but I don't see Giannis at all.

Giannis had a very good handle and PG skills in the youth leagues he was in. I see Noa as having more of a Aldridge type impact (without LMA's stupid inefficient mid-range turnaround jumper). I think Noa can be a very good player... potentially a fringe all-star level.

I think if you really want Essengue, you will be able to trade down (potentially) with Brooklyn. 9th pick for Brooklyn's 17 & 26.

Trade down would be awesome, and ideal IMO.

Brooklyn at 17 might be too far down though.
Atlanta at 13/24 or Orlando at 15/25 would be much better... even if Portland had to throw a 2nd or two in (or a player).

Top pick would be Essengue
Second pick would be Clifford or Sergio.

A trade with Orlando could be very good for both teams. Orlando is going to have to come to grips with signing Paolo in two years. Our expiring contracts could have value this off-season.

Not sure I have suggestions for what the trade would look like though. I think taking on Isaac would be great, not sure Orlando would feel the same way. KCP would be a possibility also but then toss in a couple of SRPs too? :dontknow:
Walton1one
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,882
And1: 1,051
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: 2025 Blazer Draft Prospects 

Post#285 » by Walton1one » Mon Mar 31, 2025 7:28 pm

Moving Simons this offseason would seem to make a ton of sense, and ORL\MIA have both been rumored, both have multiple (2) picks in the 1st round and salaries to make something work. It just comes down to if Cronin is willing to be reasonable for what he gets back for him, and all indications so far are that he is not.
Walton1one
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,882
And1: 1,051
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: 2025 Blazer Draft Prospects 

Post#286 » by Walton1one » Mon Mar 31, 2025 8:01 pm

Nice breakdown on Tomislav Ivisic from No Ceilings. Would like to See POR draft this guy if he stays in the draft. I think he could be a steal

https://forums.realgm.com/boards/posting.php?mode=reply&f=28&t=2410900#preview

I believe Illinois’s 7’1” freshman, Tomislav Ivisic, has been one of the more undervalued players throughout this draft cycle.


Tomislav Ivisic might be the most underrated offensive value proposition in the 2025 NBA Draft. He’s really, really skilled, and I’m not sure we’ve fully appreciated that. Let’s start with his shot. Among NBA big men who’ve stuck in the last eight years, their median pre-draft season three-point volume was 1.7 threes per 100 possessions, and the median efficiency was 28.1%. This year, Ivisic took an astounding 9.9 threes per 100 possessions and made 35.7% of them. It’s not just that Ivisic is a really accurate marksman for a big man, it’s that it is exceptionally rare to find someone his size who launches this many threes. Plus, volume tends to be a great indicator of future efficiency. We’re dealing with a super high-end “floor spacing five” prospect here.


The speed of his release bodes well for his shot’s NBA translation, too. He’s not a guy who has to bring the ball down with a deep dip before going into his shooting motion. Instead, he’s able to keep the ball pretty high and get into his release much quicker than most his size. Add in the height of his shot’s apex, and he’s comfortable shooting over closeouts, too. Per Synergy, a majority of Ivisic’s catch-and-shoot threes were classified as “guarded,” and he made 36.1% of them.


...it’s not just reasonable to believe that Ivisic’s shot could translate to the next level, but it should border on an expectation. Now, think about what that opens up for an NBA team. Having a big man who can space the floor creates additional lineup flexibility. Have a defensively oriented wing that needs some additional room to operate? Ivisic has your back. Plus, given the amount of playmaking required of modern centers (think short roll, DHO, delay), having a big man who can knock down a triple goes a long way in keeping defenses honest. The fact that Ivisic projects to be a real-deal shooter who actually draws closeouts is significant. What makes it even better is that he has the passing skills to further accentuate these traits.


Ivisic had a 15.8 AST% and a 1.41 assist-to-turnover ratio this past season, both of which grade out in the highest tier of big men prospects...He’s dynamite as a short roll passer whether he’s finding an open shooter in the weakside corner or a hard-charging cutter for a dunk. He’s comfortable operating handoffs and sees the floor well in that setting, occasionally catching defenses off-guard with more advanced reads than most big men are capable of making. He can wire bounce passes to cutters through tight windows. Ivisic can also use his length to generate advantageous angles for his deliveries, too. It’s all here. Every pass that an NBA offense could plausibly ask for out of a center, Tomislav Ivisic can make—and he generally does so while avoiding turnovers.


...Ivisic’s interior finishing. While his skill set lends itself more to the perimeter, I think it’s at least worth nothing that he’s still been really good inside. Per Synergy, he’s made 80.5% of his halfcourt rim attempts this season. His length makes it easy for him to finish dunks off rolls and dump off passes. He’s also got a decent handle for a big man when attacking a closeout, so there’s a bit of self-creation in there. His patience, touch with both hands, and post footwork help him to convert on non-dunks, too


The biggest concern about Tomislav Ivisic is whether or not he’s going to be up to scratch on the defensive end. The shortcomings are clear. For starters, his 4.0 BLK% is a super low mark for a guy who played the five. The success rate on “true centers” with that minuscule of a block rate is…not great...He’s sort of a clunky mover in space, actually. As a result, he’s near the rim a lot. His biggest issue is that he tends to keep his hands down far too late against drivers. He’s also not particularly strong, so he doesn’t swallow up smaller players with his chest. If opponents get him off his feet, he doesn’t have an easy second jump to get back into the play. There are real issues, both tactical and physical, at play here.


...can get to a level of respectability. I do believe he processes the game well. There are moments when he makes timely rotations to prevent clean looks inside. While he’s not the fastest in terms of ground coverage, he generally knows where to go and has a basic understanding of concepts such as nail help on the perimeter. He’s not clueless out there. There have also been games where he’s done a good job of using angles in drop coverage to prevent opponents from getting clean looks inside. Whether he uses his length to keep the ball handler at bay or prevents an angle to pass it to the big, he can be something of a rim deterrent, if nothing else.


While he didn’t block a high number of shots, he did make a lot of dudes miss. Per Synergy, he held opponents to 38.5% on halfcourt rim attempts this season. When smaller players drive at him, his length and fluidity prevent him from getting put on skates. As they get inside, his size and use of angles often forces them into difficult, high-arching shots. Against post players, he remains disciplined and stays grounded when he needs to. As a result, he keeps himself out of foul trouble.


Go through a list in your head of guys who got played off the floor in the playoffs over the last several years. You’re probably thinking of a lot of smaller players and wings who can’t shoot, and a lot of big guys who can’t defend...If nothing else, Ivisic did a good enough job of stopping players from scoring inside that there’s something to work with. Development doesn’t stop when a player gets to the league, and a team will need to put effort into improving his habits in drop coverage. If he doesn’t do that, it’s going to be a serious ceiling inhibitor.

...confident in Ivisic from a size and feel standpoint. If he can get better at leveraging his length inside, it would be a very meaningful development. Plus, we’re being presented with a serious surplus of offensive value. It is exceedingly difficult to find guys who launch threes like Ivisic pre-draft, particularly on his efficiency and with the functionality of his mechanics. He’s also an outstanding passer who can make advanced reads and precise deliveries without getting overindulgent. I always say that at a certain point in the draft, you have to bet on something. Depending on team context, I’d be willing to bet on Ivisic earlier than most. He’s a “guaranteed contract” tier prospect for me.


as a b\u big to Clingan, could be great, depending if the defense can come around. again though, you are talking a backup big. There are a lot of good bigs in this draft that could be future back ups to DC. Given Ayton's contract status, Williams' injuries and Reath's age, taking a late 1st or 2nd round flyer on a young big would seem to me to be a good idea. Ivisic is one of the ones that stand out to me.
User avatar
Pattycakes
General Manager
Posts: 8,481
And1: 2,084
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Contact:
     

Re: 2025 Blazer Draft Prospects 

Post#287 » by Pattycakes » Mon Mar 31, 2025 11:39 pm

My guts telling me we trade the pick along with a vet and scoop another underrated gem like Deni or Toumani that just need new scenery.

We don’t need to get younger, and we have to invest in what is mostly a complete starting lineup of 20-24 year olds.

We used to argue we needed more talent regardless of age, we can now start arguing we need to skim talent off the rest of the league as Cronins been ballin at.

My gut says it becomes an asset, and we trade down at best for a backup guard like Richardson.

I do think the Sabonis trade has potential conversation. Sacramento seems back to stupid decision purgatory and I could see them seeing Ayton much more favorably than the general consensus, looking through that lens of thinking vet treadmill is somehow the way.
Somewhere trying not to offend Texas Chuck.
Walton1one
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,882
And1: 1,051
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: 2025 Blazer Draft Prospects 

Post#288 » by Walton1one » Tue Apr 1, 2025 12:09 am

Pattycakes wrote:My guts telling me we trade the pick along with a vet and scoop another underrated gem like Deni or Toumani that just need new scenery.

We don’t need to get younger, and we have to invest in what is mostly a complete starting lineup of 20-24 year olds.

We used to argue we needed more talent regardless of age, we can now start arguing we need to skim talent off the rest of the league as Cronins been ballin at.

My gut says it becomes an asset, and we trade down at best for a backup guard like Richardson.

I do think the Sabonis trade has potential conversation. Sacramento seems back to stupid decision purgatory and I could see them seeing Ayton much more favorably than the general consensus, looking through that lens of thinking vet treadmill is somehow the way.


I'd be surprised if SAC traded Sabonis this season, I would be even more surprised if they traded him to POR. SAC has no real monetary issues this year and Sabonis is under contract for 3 more years, so the situation is not even remotely close to DeAaron Fox. They will look to add a player or two and roll back with what they have, and see what they are like with a full year of Lavine, but even if Sabonis asks out, he has no leverage, so the chance of Sabonis being traded, let alone to POR is close to zero.

For all this talent that you speak of, this team is currently 11 games under .500, and they had almost everything go right for them (no injuries, other teams with massive injuries, teams' resting stars vs POR or actively tanking), and even with that, they have shown they are incapable of beating legit playoff teams w\o an asterisk.

This team is SHORT on talent, and more importantly missing the KEY ingredient, a star player, so yeah they are not trading from a surplus...

You may be right, they may trade their 1st round pick, like to hear from you, who you think this underrated gem from another team might be, b\c I have checked and have not seen any players likely to be available that meet such criteria...
Case2012
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,825
And1: 1,976
Joined: Jan 03, 2012
 

Re: 2025 Blazer Draft Prospects 

Post#289 » by Case2012 » Tue Apr 1, 2025 6:05 am

I have been saying I think Cronin is gonna trade for Trae or Zion for a while now, idk why just my spidey sense i guess. Man, I think building through the draft is really the key to any successful team here. If we can't get into the top 3, i would not mind trading down for 2 picks. Maybe ATL? 9 for 13 and 24?

I want Clifford and Wolf.. Fleming too but there's no chance we draft 3 guys(if we even use the pick at all). Clifford looks like he could be a Knecht/Jaquez type guy but with a way more complete game with the passing. Speaking of passing --- WOLF... Tell me he doesn't give Sabonis vibes? Maybe Sengun would be a better comparison.

He would be such a nice offensive contrast to Clingan. Guys his size that can move like that and have that kind of vision are special. Hopefully we don't have to trade down and can just unload Simons for the 15th pick. I don't care what order they're drafted in but Wolf and Clifford neeeed to be Blazers.

Imagine adding Clifford and Wolf to this team to start the season next year. I've always been a pass first player and I drool over players with special passing vision and both these guys have "IT" in that dept. They're 21 and 23 so I think they would fit with age of the core right away.


;ab_channel=NoCeilingsNBA
;t=755s&ab_channel=NoCeilingsNBA
Image
Instagram: @casetwelve
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 11,989
And1: 9,432
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: 2025 Blazer Draft Prospects 

Post#290 » by BlazersBroncos » Wed Apr 2, 2025 3:40 am

I’m in on Wolf. Love his complimentary game to DC. Think he could be Mehment Okur with some more athletic juice.
Walton1one
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,882
And1: 1,051
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: 2025 Blazer Draft Prospects 

Post#291 » by Walton1one » Wed Apr 2, 2025 5:39 pm

No Ceilings on Carter Bryant, a darkhorse name to consider for POR, considering their draft pick may continue to fall back from #9....

https://www.noceilingsnba.com/p/carter-bryant-is-a-winning-player?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=536361&post_id=160027389&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=1f5gb9&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

Bryant’s role and involvement have fluctuated all season, but that’s never deterred him from doing the little things that make everyone else around him better. Whether it’s taking the toughest defensive matchup, knocking down shots off the catch, crashing the boards, or making quick decisions, Bryant consistently makes winning plays. Bryant may not have as high of a ceiling as other prospects in the 2025 NBA Draft have, but his consistency, fundamentals, and athletic tools give him an incredibly high floor with plenty of room to grow.


He’s one of those players that you really have to focus on because of all the little things he does that impact that game. The fact that Bryant is already such a catalyst to winning basketball is incredibly encouraging for his career outlook.

When Bryant was on the floor for Arizona, they had an offensive rating of 128.4 (5th) and a defensive rating of 94.1 (15th). Without Bryant on the floor, those ratings were 122.1 (18th) and 97.3 (35th) respectively. Those aren’t detrimental drop-offs, but the difference is staggering when you consider that Bryant only started five out of 36 games and ranks seventh on the team in minutes per game.


Bryant’s BPM of 7.8 ranked second on the team (just behind Henri Veesaar), eighth among all freshmen (behind Cooper Flagg, VJ Edgecombe, Jase Richardson, Kon Knueppel, Asa Newell, Khaman Maluach, and Dylan Harper), and his defensive BPM of 4.6 ranked fourth among all freshmen (behind Flagg, Flory Bidunga, and Luke Bamgboye), per BartTorvik.So how did a freshman who had a minute share of just 47.5 (Flagg was 71.3 for reference) and averaged 6.5 points make such an impact on winning?


...there aren’t many prospects who have the same combination of footwork, awareness, strength, and explosiveness that Bryant has. Bryant is an incredibly unselfish defender as he constantly has his head on a swivel; he is a highly effective weak-side rim protector, and he doesn’t hesitate to scramble on defense. Bryant’s reliability and consistency as a help defender are extremely rare for his age and a driving reason behind why he posted a block rate of 6.0 and a steal rate of 2.7.


Bryant has also proven that he’s one of the most effective and versatile on-ball defenders in this draft class...He moves his feet incredibly well, sits down in a stance, and can defend nearly any position on the court. He’ll occasionally get a little too handsy or beat by the extremely quick guards, but he is almost never out of the play. By constantly sliding his feet and staying on balance, Bryant is a nightmare to try and beat to the rim. He rarely allows ball handlers to turn the corner because of his footwork, and his strength allows him to wall up drives and switch on bigger opponents. Additionally, his balance, footwork, and explosiveness make him elite at contesting jumpers. Bryant is disciplined with his block attempts, is quick off the ground, and has great instincts.


If POR is going "all in" on the defensive identity, Bryant would sure seem to be a good fit alongside Camara, Deni & Clingan (maybe Thybulle?)....

There are a lot of players who are either elite on-ball or as team defenders. The really special ones are those who consistently combine both facets from possession to possession. That’s the group that Bryant falls into. The way that he can switch nearly everything, act as a defensive playmaker, bail his teammates out with rotations, and shut down isolation possessions is incredibly valuable. When we look at the elite defenders in the 2025 NBA Draft class, Bryant is up there with the best of them


When we look at the elite wing defenders in this class, there is a pretty steep drop-off and not a ton of names up there after Flagg, Edgecombe, Nique Clifford, and Bryant.


Clifford & Bryant....I think those would be the 2 names to watch at POR pick, especially since it looks like Knueppel may be gone by the time they pick, besides they apparently don't like shooters anyway...lol

The reason that Bryant doesn’t consistently get mentioned with the top wings in this class is because of his offense...Per Synergy, the three most common play types for Bryant are spot up at 36.1%, transition at 17%, and cuts at 14.9%. That’s 68% of his possessions as being just a play finisher while only 9.8% consist of him operating the pick-and-roll along with zero isolation possessions. This usage distribution is only an issue if you’re trying to find a wing creator. If you’re scouting Bryant for what he is while also developing ancillary traits to explore his upside, though, you’re going to be really happy with the efficient off-ball scorer that he is.


I don't think they are looking for a wing creator (they should be IMO), but for another plug & play guy that could be an interchangeable piece at the forward spots.

...Bryant is confident shooting off the catch, isn’t deterred by a defender’s presence, and was thrown a lot of last-second grenades. All of these factors suggest positive growth for him as a shooter going forward...has improved substantially as a shooter...still has some work to do...isn’t exclusively limited to being a standstill shooter. We saw him knock down plenty of relocation threes, but he’s also a very good mover without the ball. His timely cuts, activity, and athleticism make him a great outlet for ball handlers. It also allows him to get easy hoops at the rim on cuts and offensive rebounds. This season, Bryant ranked in the 97th percentile in at-rim scoring and shot 78.9% at the rim in the halfcourt. The volume wasn’t astronomical, given his role, but his size, strength, and explosiveness make him a big-time threat.


The more theoretical aspects of Bryant’s offense are his pull-up shooting and playmaking...What lends more optimism is that his film shows consistent mechanics to his shot off the catch, a high, fluid release, and encouraging scoring touch. I wouldn’t plan on Bryant rapidly growing into a dynamic pull-up shooter, but I believe there is a ton of room for him to grow as a second-side creator.


An assist rate of 8.6, a turnover rate of 18.9, and an assist-to-turnover ratio of 1.0 don’t exactly scream PASSER. I get it. At the same time, though, those numbers feel like they align far more with his role than his capabilities. As we can see below, Bryant has really good vision and accuracy. He keeps his head up, hits teammates in stride, and is willing to make some difficult passes. His eagerness also led to plenty of air-mailed passes, but the flashes are incredibly enticing.


...I’d be pretty surprised if he grows into an offensive hub. His handle needs a lot of work, and we’ve never really seen him in that role, but that doesn’t mean he’s inept at creating on offense...imagining him as a team’s third offensive option...On offense, he’s a highly efficient play-finisher with tantalizing passing upside. On defense, he does just about everything at a high level. Bryant may not have the upside that guys in the Top 5 have, but that’s why he doesn’t get mentioned in that range. What he does have, though, is an incredible baseline as a 3-and-D wing who looks like he could play a decade-plus in the league. At a minimum, that archetype deserves to go much higher than he tends to get mentioned.
Walton1one
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,882
And1: 1,051
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: 2025 Blazer Draft Prospects 

Post#292 » by Walton1one » Wed Apr 2, 2025 5:47 pm

No Ceilings on Adou Thiero, can't say I have watched a ton on him, but doesn't really excite me as a prospect. Mostly seen him mentioned as a 2nd rounder. He is another defensive oriented switchable wing though...

https://www.noceilingsnba.com/p/a-scouts-eyes-adou-thiero-growing?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=536361&post_id=160295894&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=1f5gb9&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email


The key to immediate NBA playing time for Thiero will be his defensive versatility and playmaking (2.3 stocks per game)...As a wing, Thiero offers switchability (1 through perimeter-oriented 4s), a weak-side shot-blocking threat, and upside as a point-of-attack defender...gifted athlete with NBA positional size on top of an assortment of explosive and functional physical tools that show up defensively...all of the tools are there for him to quickly develop into a plus NBA defender.


...his best offensive asset: play-finishing...thrives in the open floor and on timely cuts (97th percentile via Synergy) while operating as a significant out-of-area offensive rebounder (1.8 offensive rebounds per game) and put-back threat... still not a very creative or shifty scorer, Thiero is a physical slasher and capable shotmaker with adequate ball skills who is most effective when he’s playing downhill on direct line drives...only real blemish...unfortunate step back in his swing skill: three-point shooting...outside touch dropped significantly to 25.6% on 1.6 3PA/G (11-43 3PA) this season...his production still greatly diminished despite taking easier shots in theory...nothing egregious about his shooting mechanics or foundation....cleaning up some of the minor issues that seem to emerge on his jumper at times (inconsistent balance and landing spots, can flick the ball at the release point instead of smoothly following through) could help change his current shooting trajectory.


Thiero projects as a defensively tilted wing with NBA positional size that can defend multiple perimeter positions, impact games as a defensive playmaker, and dynamic play-finisher with functional ball skills. Eventually filling a 3-and-D role is ideal, but he must continue to grow as a shooter to fulfill it (career 28.4% 3P shooter on 74 3PA)...how well Thiero shoots in pre-draft workouts in conjunction with his career marks will decide if NBA decision-makers believe their staff can develop him into a reliable open three-point shooter, which ultimately determines his draft stock...is in that late first to early second round range
Walton1one
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,882
And1: 1,051
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: 2025 Blazer Draft Prospects 

Post#293 » by Walton1one » Wed Apr 2, 2025 6:03 pm

BR updated mock draft, Final 4 edition

https://www.nba.com/news/bleacher-report-2025-nba-mock-draft-final-four

Queen @ #5 to BRK, Fears @ #6 to PHI

Both these seem a little odd to me...more so Fears to Philly, for a team with Maxey & McCain, adding another smallish guard?

Brooklyn has several developmental bigs that it looks like they plan to keep: Claxton, Clowney, Sharpe, but adding Queen I don't think would be totally bizarre, Fears/Johnson/Richardson would seem to make more sense though, especially with unknown status of Cam Thomas and some projections of $30mil+, which why bid against themselves? But at minimum $20+ mil...

Spurs taking Johnson 2 #8

POR taking Richardson @ #9? I don't see that, and passing on Knueppel & Jakucionis

Jase Richardson scored 20 points on just eight shots against Ole Miss, stepping into spot-up threes and picking the right spots to use his dribble and drive. His shots just wouldn’t fall against Auburn, but nothing alarming was exposed in the loss.

Part of the reason he’d become so well regarded was because of his consistency. Even without a high-usage role, he had been a reliable source for shotmaking, finishing and high-energy plays.

It’s also become clear that he offers more creativity than the early numbers suggest. While he’s been incredibly efficient off the ball, he’s also been one of the nation’s most efficient ball-screen scorers thanks to his feel on drives, elite finishing and 49.1% pull-up shooting.


MIA taking Knueppel @ #10, Jakucionis @ #12, Essengue up to #13, Newell @ #14

Carter Bryant @ #15, I would not be surprised if he goes higher...

Arizona’s three NCAA tournament games served as a reminder that Carter Bryant’s game and role make him highly dependent on making spot-up threes and getting transition opportunities.

But he also made enough jumpers with convincing mechanics for scouts to buy Carter’s shooting long term. And that his physical tools and athleticism, the play-finishing and defensive playmaking also appear translatable. A 6-foot-8, 220-pound, 19-year-old three-and-D wing figures to start drawing serious consideration in the mid-first round.


Demin falling to #18 to UTA, this draft has them getting Flagg AND Demin

Egor Demin could have only helped himself in the NCAA tournament. He showed how advantageous his size and ball-handling can be for slashing against Alabama. Against VCU, he hit three threes and a pair of fallaways, shots he made sporadically throughout the season that create some degree of hope/optimism in his potential to become a more reliable outside threat.

Regardless, teams’ main draw to Demin will be his playmaking, which projects to translate first and easiest.

Bad turnovers, poor shooting and limited off-ball value just suggest Demin may be tough for NBA playoff teams to trust for minutes next year.


Nique Clifford @ #20 to MIA, so this mock has MIA taking Knueppel AND Clifford

Danny Wolf @ #21 to OKC, I am not really a fan of his game

Danny Wolf made a strong, final pitch to scouts against Auburn, finishing with 20 points and a number of eye-opening highlights that showcased his creation and shotmaking.

Though his three-point numbers might not indicate shooting improvement, he added a pull-up and step-back to his repertoire this year. A 7-footer that made 21 dribble jumpers, served as Michigan’s lead playmaker and still averaged 9.7 boards and 1.4 blocks is bound to entice a number of teams.
Walton1one
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,882
And1: 1,051
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: 2025 Blazer Draft Prospects 

Post#294 » by Walton1one » Wed Apr 2, 2025 7:49 pm

Kevin O'Connor with 10 biggest movers of March Madness

https://sports.yahoo.com/nba/article/2025-nba-draft-10-biggest-movers-of-march-madness-150600352.html

1 Walter Clayton - Rank change: 55th to 30th
Moves him to a borderline 1st rounder, I am not so sure about that

Clayton’s shotmaking, on-ball wiggle and end-of-game confidence are undeniably Steph-like too. His severe defensive limitations and shaky playmaking had him entering March at 55th on my board, but I placed too much focus on what he doesn’t do and not enough on what he does. He’s a shotmaker, a moment seizer and just a straight-up pure hooper. That’s enough to warrant first-round consideration.


2 Labaron Philon - Rank change: 31st to 23rd
If he declarres\stays in the draft, I think he will be a 1st rounder. He played well and although there are a lot of questions\concerns about him, I think a team will take the risk at the back end of the 1st.

...he made 45.5% of his 3-pointers in four tournament games, which follows a trend this season of his numbers improving from month to month. Defenders often went under his screens and he made them pay, in addition to looking fluid off the catch.

It’s hard to pass on his type of upside in the middle of the first round, which is why he’s moving up my board. But Philon has a tough decision to make whether to stay in college or go pro. With point guard Mark Sears graduating, he’d have the keys to the offense next season and the chance to play himself into the top 10.


3. Milos Uzan, Houston guard - Rank change: 38th to 31st

4. Tyrese Proctor, Duke guard - Rank change: 30th to 24th
Another guy whose play has moved him solidly into 1st round consideration

...he’s grown into a defensive pest. And offensively, he sees the floor, makes the right reads and can drain shots all over the floor. Proctor keeps looking more and more like Celtics guard Derrick White with the way he positively impacts the game as a low-usage, high-trust guy who’s capable of handling a bigger load when needed...March didn’t make Proctor, but it’s solidifying the case that he’s worth a first-round pick.


5. Johni Broome, Auburn big - Rank change: 52nd to 46th
Still have him solidly as a 2nd round pick. Interesting to see if a team reaches late in the 1st for him.

Broome is by no means an elite athlete, and from an NBA perspective he certainly has some shortcomings. But, man, the dude just impacts winning...Broome is the quintessential “got that dawg in him” player, and so even though it’s a subtle change, he moves up my board.


6. Darrion Williams, Texas Tech forward - Rank change: 43rd to 39th

7. JT Toppin, Texas Tech big - Rank change: 36th to 33rd
I think either of these guys could sneak into the back end of the 1st round, but depending on who stays in draft are more likely 2nd round picks..

...It’s amazing to see the way they impacted the game in so many different ways. Toppin scored on rolls to the rim, from the post and from beyond the arc, while also playing super versatile defense. And as he did all season, Williams played everything from point guard to center, depending on what the game needed. Neither guy is a primary option, but both fit snugly into winning basketball. That’s why their stock is rising.


8. Danny Wolf, Michigan big - Rank change: 28th to 26th
Soldily a 1st rounder, I tend to think he is a later 1st round pick, but some mocks have him just outside the lottery. Not a big fan of him either though. Also read some concerns with his passing\decision making

I’m admittedly a skeptic of Wolf. He made 33.6% of his 3s and only 59.4% of his free throws with Michigan, numbers just as subpar as his first two years with Yale...there’s belief his struggles at the free-throw line are mental, which worries me even more since it’s hard to solve whatever’s going on between the ears. Especially after he just made only 25% of his free throws in the tournament...hard to ignore just how fluidly Wolf moves as a 7-footer. And he dropped 20 points scoring in a myriad of ways against Auburn's excellent defense with a step-back 3 and tons of swirly drives to the basket with crossovers, hesitations and back-downs. There’s something there worth a gamble in the late first.


That said, the Israeli-American playmaker is also turnover prone. Wolf loses the ball in avoidable ways and he has to keep improving his handle. There's no doubt that Wolf can play with the ball in his hands in college, but I think the tape suggests that he'll struggle to beat defenders at the next level.


9. Khaman Maluach, Duke center - Rank: 5th to 4th
Maluach AND Queen as Top 10 picks? Looking more likely. I am skeptical on the 3pt shooting, similar things were said about Clingan and I don't believe that 3pt shooting will\should be a part of either players' game

...contested everything around the basket, even sticking his arm up to block dunk attempts. We saw him deter players from trying layups and even switch onto the perimeter on a few occasions, moving his feet laterally with quickness. He keeps getting better defensively, which was on full display against a high-powered, modern-style offense...That’s the state of the game with 7-footers all trying to be shooters. But it’s different with Maluach since he has such great touch from the line (76.4% this season) and near the rim (57.1% on hook shots, per Synergy). He’s made only four of his 16 shots from 3 this season, but there’s something there that could make him much more than just a standard interior center that warrants moving him up one spot.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 33,309
And1: 18,875
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: 2025 Blazer Draft Prospects 

Post#295 » by dckingsfan » Wed Apr 2, 2025 9:31 pm

Walton1one wrote:POR taking Richardson @ #9? I don't see that, and passing on Knueppel & Jakucionis

Jase Richardson scored 20 points on just eight shots against Ole Miss, stepping into spot-up threes and picking the right spots to use his dribble and drive. His shots just wouldn’t fall against Auburn, but nothing alarming was exposed in the loss.

Part of the reason he’d become so well regarded was because of his consistency. Even without a high-usage role, he had been a reliable source for shotmaking, finishing and high-energy plays.

It’s also become clear that he offers more creativity than the early numbers suggest. While he’s been incredibly efficient off the ball, he’s also been one of the nation’s most efficient ball-screen scorers thanks to his feel on drives, elite finishing and 49.1% pull-up shooting.


This is a pretty good discussion.

First, if we are getting our ping-pong balls at 9, likely we are at 10 or 11. Either way, we will have a choice of one of Egor Demin, Kon Knueppel, Jase Richardson or Kasparas Jakucionis.

Which player do you think has the highest ceiling?
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 11,989
And1: 9,432
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: 2025 Blazer Draft Prospects 

Post#296 » by BlazersBroncos » Wed Apr 2, 2025 10:00 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
Walton1one wrote:POR taking Richardson @ #9? I don't see that, and passing on Knueppel & Jakucionis

Jase Richardson scored 20 points on just eight shots against Ole Miss, stepping into spot-up threes and picking the right spots to use his dribble and drive. His shots just wouldn’t fall against Auburn, but nothing alarming was exposed in the loss.

Part of the reason he’d become so well regarded was because of his consistency. Even without a high-usage role, he had been a reliable source for shotmaking, finishing and high-energy plays.

It’s also become clear that he offers more creativity than the early numbers suggest. While he’s been incredibly efficient off the ball, he’s also been one of the nation’s most efficient ball-screen scorers thanks to his feel on drives, elite finishing and 49.1% pull-up shooting.


This is a pretty good discussion.

First, if we are getting our ping-pong balls at 9, likely we are at 10 or 11. Either way, we will have a choice of one of Egor Demin, Kon Knueppel, Jase Richardson or Kasparas Jakucionis.

Which player do you think has the highest ceiling?


I take Noa over all of them - but of the bunch I am now team Kon.

Kon, Kasparas, Jase, Egor.
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 33,309
And1: 18,875
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: 2025 Blazer Draft Prospects 

Post#297 » by dckingsfan » Wed Apr 2, 2025 10:34 pm

BlazersBroncos wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:
Walton1one wrote:POR taking Richardson @ #9? I don't see that, and passing on Knueppel & Jakucionis



This is a pretty good discussion.

First, if we are getting our ping-pong balls at 9, likely we are at 10 or 11. Either way, we will have a choice of one of Egor Demin, Kon Knueppel, Jase Richardson or Kasparas Jakucionis.

Which player do you think has the highest ceiling?

I take Noa over all of them - but of the bunch I am now team Kon.

Kon, Kasparas, Jase, Egor.

I wouldn't cry at all to trade down and get Essengue and say Sergio de Larrea.
Walton1one
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,882
And1: 1,051
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: 2025 Blazer Draft Prospects 

Post#298 » by Walton1one » Thu Apr 3, 2025 12:31 am

dckingsfan wrote:
Walton1one wrote:POR taking Richardson @ #9? I don't see that, and passing on Knueppel & Jakucionis

Jase Richardson scored 20 points on just eight shots against Ole Miss, stepping into spot-up threes and picking the right spots to use his dribble and drive. His shots just wouldn’t fall against Auburn, but nothing alarming was exposed in the loss.

Part of the reason he’d become so well regarded was because of his consistency. Even without a high-usage role, he had been a reliable source for shotmaking, finishing and high-energy plays.

It’s also become clear that he offers more creativity than the early numbers suggest. While he’s been incredibly efficient off the ball, he’s also been one of the nation’s most efficient ball-screen scorers thanks to his feel on drives, elite finishing and 49.1% pull-up shooting.


This is a pretty good discussion.

First, if we are getting our ping-pong balls at 9, likely we are at 10 or 11. Either way, we will have a choice of one of Egor Demin, Kon Knueppel, Jase Richardson or Kasparas Jakucionis.

Which player do you think has the highest ceiling?


Yeah, it is a good discussion. All 4 of those players IMO are intriguing.

No doubt that Richardson's shot-making and moxie has been eye opening\impressive. The question is does Cronin give up on Scoot\bring in a possible replacement? Also, does Richardson even meet the type of criteria that the front office has clearly been targeting? It is one thing at #3 to take someone (Scoot) who probably does not fit their "profile", but at #9/10? Lot more flexibility there.

Then there is how I would rank them, amateur scout and all, or how any one else would rank them (including draft analysts), but the only opinion that really matters is how Crionin\Schmitz rank them, which goes back to what is their "type"?

IMO, and it certainly can\will change, if those are the 4 players on the board, right now Jakucionis would be #1, he can shoot, he has flexibility b\t PG\SG, he is not Knueppel level (shooting) but then he also brings size, PG ability and insurance in case Scoot is not that guy.

2nd, Knueppel, he is an antidote for the one glaring weakness that this team has, shooting, and I think he is underrated in several of the other aspects of his game.

3rd, this is tough call, it could be either, but I would say Demin, definitely the bigger risk\reward, but he has great size, which means position flexibility, he could play with or w\o a smaller PG, he could even play SF if needed, but he has a lot of weaknesses he needs to address.

The question with Richardson is, do you think he is transcendent enough to overcome the obvious size questions? You cannot play Scoot & Jase and expect to be a legitimate playoff contending team, POR tried this already with Dame\CJ. So IMO, if you are drafting Richardson you are basically letting them play it out to who will stay and who will go. Also, I seriously question whether Cronin\Schmitz value Richardson as much as they would other prospects. In fact, I think there are other prospects they might value more than these 4 guys, but Demin IMO, clearly fits their profile more than any of the other 3 players mentioned.

How do they view Carter Bryant though? or Noa Essengue? Asa Newell? Nique Clifford? I think any of those 4 guys are equal to\more likely to be chosen than these 4 players, and that is assuming that Knueppel\Richardson even make it that far to POR pick.

Tough call, I have liked Jakucionis for most of the year, I do not think he fits POR profile though, definitely been impressed by Knueppel this year (and specifically in the tournament), not sure he fits their profile either, POR mgmt seems to avoid shooters like the plague, even though they are a bad shooting team, so to me, I'd be happy with Jakuciuonis\Knueppel, but for Cronin\Scmitz, my guess is Bryant\Newell\Essengue (maybe Murray-Boyles, yuck), old Roy bias likes Clifford, but I am not sure the new POR mgmt views him as favorably as I do.
Sinobas
Analyst
Posts: 3,746
And1: 583
Joined: Jun 20, 2008

Re: 2025 Blazer Draft Prospects 

Post#299 » by Sinobas » Thu Apr 3, 2025 12:37 pm

Walton1one wrote:
Pattycakes wrote:My guts telling me we trade the pick along with a vet and scoop another underrated gem like Deni or Toumani that just need new scenery.

We don’t need to get younger, and we have to invest in what is mostly a complete starting lineup of 20-24 year olds.

We used to argue we needed more talent regardless of age, we can now start arguing we need to skim talent off the rest of the league as Cronins been ballin at.

My gut says it becomes an asset, and we trade down at best for a backup guard like Richardson.

I do think the Sabonis trade has potential conversation. Sacramento seems back to stupid decision purgatory and I could see them seeing Ayton much more favorably than the general consensus, looking through that lens of thinking vet treadmill is somehow the way.


I'd be surprised if SAC traded Sabonis this season, I would be even more surprised if they traded him to POR. SAC has no real monetary issues this year and Sabonis is under contract for 3 more years, so the situation is not even remotely close to DeAaron Fox. They will look to add a player or two and roll back with what they have, and see what they are like with a full year of Lavine, but even if Sabonis asks out, he has no leverage, so the chance of Sabonis being traded, let alone to POR is close to zero.

For all this talent that you speak of, this team is currently 11 games under .500, and they had almost everything go right for them (no injuries, other teams with massive injuries, teams' resting stars vs POR or actively tanking), and even with that, they have shown they are incapable of beating legit playoff teams w\o an asterisk.

This team is SHORT on talent, and more importantly missing the KEY ingredient, a star player, so yeah they are not trading from a surplus...

You may be right, they may trade their 1st round pick, like to hear from you, who you think this underrated gem from another team might be, b\c I have checked and have not seen any players likely to be available that meet such criteria...


I think the kicker would be if Sabonis asked out. Teams generally don't like to keep disgruntled players around. And they might see that they don't have much future with their current old roster, and will be stuck in mediocrity for years. The same position Portland was in.


Such a rebuilding team would want picks/young prospects/expirings. All of which we have. I don't think we have the ability to trade future picks, but those Milwauki Swaps are looking good!
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 11,989
And1: 9,432
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: 2025 Blazer Draft Prospects 

Post#300 » by BlazersBroncos » Thu Apr 3, 2025 2:46 pm

dckingsfan wrote:
BlazersBroncos wrote:
dckingsfan wrote:This is a pretty good discussion.

First, if we are getting our ping-pong balls at 9, likely we are at 10 or 11. Either way, we will have a choice of one of Egor Demin, Kon Knueppel, Jase Richardson or Kasparas Jakucionis.

Which player do you think has the highest ceiling?

I take Noa over all of them - but of the bunch I am now team Kon.

Kon, Kasparas, Jase, Egor.

I wouldn't cry at all to trade down and get Essengue and say Sergio de Larrea.


I dont think you can get him in a trade down. I expect him to blow up as the draft approaches. But if you can, I sure as hell love that idea.

For me - trade Simons to MIA for Rozier and their FRP - then move Reath for a SRP (I am hoping the March play will return his value to last year - which to me is a FRP in the 40's) - lets say to GSW for their SRP via MIA - finally, sell RWIII to someone for a similar EC and a SRP or 2 (HOU w/ Landale fits to me IMO)

PDX FRP - Noa Essengue F - Big swing, highest potential in the draft outside the Top-2 guys IMHO.
MIA FRP (Via GSW) - Rasheer Flemming FC - I like his ability to likely play small ball C as he is stocky (240lbs) and long (7'3-7'4 WS). Great compliment to DC as the eventual backup with upside to develop at PF.
GSW SRP (Via MIA) - Walter Clayton JR or Tyrese Proctor - A developmental shooting compliment at PG/CG to Scoot.

Let Jabari and Banton walk and run it back w/ -

G - Scoot Henderson / Terry Rozier / Walter Clayton JR OR Tyrese Proctor
G - Shadeon Sharpe / Matisse Thybulle / Rayan Rupert
F - Toumani Camara / Jerami Grant / Kris Murray
F - Deni Avdija / Jerami Grant / Noa Essengue / Rasheer Flemming
C - DeAndre Ayton / Donovan Clingan / Rasheer Flemming / Jock Landale

I could live w/ that offseason.

Return to Portland Trail Blazers