Oden2 wrote:I don't know what's so ridiculous about the notion that Dragic can be a better player than Hibbert and probably is right now. You don't have to agree with me on that but I don't think its too ridiculous to say Dragic is better either. My stance from early along is that Hibbert would be an ok signing but I thougth people would start acting as if he's the second coming of god once their team made him a max offer. Frankly I'm done arguing the Dragic Hibbert issue considering that it doesn't seem like we're gonna agree on this one.
It's ridiculous on multiple levels. For starters you're seriously comparing a first time all star CENTER to a FULL TIME BACKUP POINT GUARD. "lol"
Explain to us how Dragic is better. Let's see your logical rational fact backed line of reasoning.
What were Dragic's offense and defensive ratings in the playoffs? Because I have Hibbert's right here, and defensively he was insanely good. Oh, and from a raw statistical production standpoint he was superior to Dragic. How about per, FIC, pace adjusted stats, etc.
Come on, you've been talking your guy up for so long now that I'm sure you've got the numbers to back up your opinion, even if you have to cherry pick, right?
You haven't argued anything. You haven't provided any sound reasoning to support your opinion. All you've done is make ridiculous statements regarding the players we drafted and the FA offer to Hibbert. All hyperbole and no substance. Detail for us exactly why you have come to your conclusions.
But you can't do any of that, can you? This isn't an argument, this is you making a fool of yourself. "knife to a gunfight" and all that.