ImageImage

Pistons fan - Draft Day Question

Moderators: DeBlazerRiddem, Moonbeam

User avatar
JasonStern
RealGM
Posts: 12,560
And1: 4,453
Joined: Dec 13, 2008
   

Re: Pistons fan - Draft Day Question 

Post#41 » by JasonStern » Fri Jun 15, 2012 6:22 pm

Piston Pete wrote:I was thinking about doing #9 and Villanueva for #11 and Shawne Williams.....or something similar.


take the #11 out, and add matthews to make the value fair, and I'd consider it depending on who is available at #9.

the trade as stated is a definite no. there is no way portland is taking on $13.5 million ($16.5 million owed less $3 million for williams) to move up two spots in the draft. maybe if villanueva was serviceable, but he isn't...

Piston Pete wrote:
Billy wrote:Perhaps #9, CV for #11, Williams, and Kurt Thomas would be a bit more appealing in that situation.


I think that would be something the Pistons would consider as well.


of course they would. it's completely lopsided in detroit's favor and a terrible use of capspace for portland. by not giving up #11, it makes sense to take on villanueva's contract since the positive value of a rookie scale contract offsets the negative value of villanueva's contract. but taking on $16.5 million in financial obligations and giving up a lotto pick to move up two spaces is less advantageous than, say, keeping the #11 pick and using our capspace to sign a player like dragic.
Image
User avatar
Piston Pete
RealGM
Posts: 19,521
And1: 1,544
Joined: Feb 07, 2002
Location: Way out in left field

Re: Pistons fan - Draft Day Question 

Post#42 » by Piston Pete » Thu Jun 21, 2012 11:49 pm

Now that you guys are rumored to take Lillard at #6....trading back up to #9 could get you Drummond or another C (Zeller/Leonard) before NO takes one at #10.

Does taking Lillard at #6 increase your tendancy of trading up ahead of NO for the best available big?
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 39,088
And1: 24,768
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
 

Re: Pistons fan - Draft Day Question 

Post#43 » by DusterBuster » Thu Jun 21, 2012 11:51 pm

Piston Pete wrote:Now that you guys are rumored to take Lillard at #6....trading back up to #9 could get you Drummond or another C (Zeller/Leonard) before NO takes one at #10.

Does taking Lillard at #6 increase your tendancy of trading up ahead of NO for the best available big?


Totally depends how much it'll cost to move up. You still haven't told us what you think the Pistons would want in return from Portland to move from 11 to 9. You just keep posting and then disappearing.
Get ready to learn Chinese buddy... #YangBang
User avatar
RoyalWun
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,694
And1: 511
Joined: Jul 05, 2009
Location: NY, New York
     

Re: Pistons fan - Draft Day Question 

Post#44 » by RoyalWun » Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:08 am

portlandoden wrote:I'd rather Marshall than Lillard


Holy hell I thought I was the only one.
Dammit...:

I've got Nurkic fever now.
Vega
Pro Prospect
Posts: 874
And1: 151
Joined: Jun 12, 2006

Re: Pistons fan - Draft Day Question 

Post#45 » by Vega » Fri Jun 22, 2012 8:24 am

Piston Pete wrote:Now that you guys are rumored to take Lillard at #6....trading back up to #9 could get you Drummond or another C (Zeller/Leonard) before NO takes one at #10.

Does taking Lillard at #6 increase your tendancy of trading up ahead of NO for the best available big?


I can't speak for anyone else but I would have no interest in Zeller and only a lukewarm interest in Leonard at 11, and I find it extremely unlikely that Drummond would drop past Detroit at 8.
User avatar
Cro_Ruption
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,875
And1: 93
Joined: Jul 03, 2008
Location: P-TOWN

Re: Pistons fan - Draft Day Question 

Post#46 » by Cro_Ruption » Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:45 pm

id give nolan and the 11th
SharoneWright wrote:I would not trade Bargs for Roy.

Monster or no.

i said it. And I live in a flame retardent suit.

Return to Portland Trail Blazers