ImageImage

Breaking: Blazers sold to Tom Dundon

Moderators: Moonbeam, DeBlazerRiddem

User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 36,382
And1: 22,074
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
   

Re: Breaking: Blazers sold to Tom Dundon 

Post#41 » by DusterBuster » Thu Aug 14, 2025 1:18 am

Andre 2999 wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:
DusterBuster wrote:
Yes, but he always routinely did some every year in Portland. He always did media availability year in and year out during the draft, at the start of the season and at the end of the season.

We don't need to hear from the owners weekly on a pod or anything, but do SOMETHING. It's been literally 5 years and Jodie has never said one word at any moment.

Wow, as someone who doesn't regularly follow them, that's news to me. He avoided the spotlight completely when it came to dealing with Seattle media.

Here's one random interview with him during the 2013-14 training camp:

Like Duster said, it was usually only once or twice a year. But it was always nice when he would make an appearance. Now it's news to me that he didn't do these for the Seahawks, that's surprising. No doubt he was very passionate about both teams though.


Same here, I assumed Allen would do the same. To be fair, the Blazers were always his main love, he bought the Hawks as more of a civic duty as a Seattle native to keep the team in Seattle was the story we always heard. He was just way more into basketball than football.
Get ready to learn Chinese buddy... #YangBang
User avatar
Cactus Jack
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Forum Mod - Supersonics
Posts: 33,171
And1: 16,655
Joined: Feb 25, 2015
Location: PNW
       

Re: Breaking: Blazers sold to Tom Dundon 

Post#42 » by Cactus Jack » Thu Aug 14, 2025 1:44 am

DusterBuster wrote:
Andre 2999 wrote:
Cactus Jack wrote:Wow, as someone who doesn't regularly follow them, that's news to me. He avoided the spotlight completely when it came to dealing with Seattle media.

Here's one random interview with him during the 2013-14 training camp:

Like Duster said, it was usually only once or twice a year. But it was always nice when he would make an appearance. Now it's news to me that he didn't do these for the Seahawks, that's surprising. No doubt he was very passionate about both teams though.


Same here, I assumed Allen would do the same. To be fair, the Blazers were always his main love, he bought the Hawks as more of a civic duty as a Seattle native to keep the team in Seattle was the story we always heard. He was just way more into basketball than football.

In Seattle, he never did these. It was always the GM & head coach that fielded questions from the media. He appeared to be very hands off with the Hawks. But wasn't afraid to hire the best Football people & coaches (Mike Holmgren & Carroll) to run the show. Which is why he remained popular among fans.

The only time you saw Paul was during a game telecast, when he was in his suite or when he would raise the 12th man flag for pregame. That's the only time he was visible for fans. No public interviews.

Jody avoids the spotlight as well. So, fans in Seattle don't really take issue with her either.
Dominater wrote:Damn Cactus jack takin over
User avatar
Shem
RealGM
Posts: 15,641
And1: 3,523
Joined: Dec 15, 2009
     

Re: Breaking: Blazers sold to Tom Dundon 

Post#43 » by Shem » Thu Aug 14, 2025 3:07 am



Worth a listen about whatTom Dundon did with the Carolina Hurricanes.
April 4, 2014:
HotrodBeaubois wrote:I never said Dallas was good as Portland


Earlier on December 8, 2013:
HotrodBeaubois wrote:That's the Whole Point Portland is No better than Dallas
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 36,382
And1: 22,074
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
   

Re: Breaking: Blazers sold to Tom Dundon 

Post#44 » by DusterBuster » Thu Aug 14, 2025 3:20 am

Cactus Jack wrote:
DusterBuster wrote:
Andre 2999 wrote:Here's one random interview with him during the 2013-14 training camp:

Like Duster said, it was usually only once or twice a year. But it was always nice when he would make an appearance. Now it's news to me that he didn't do these for the Seahawks, that's surprising. No doubt he was very passionate about both teams though.


Same here, I assumed Allen would do the same. To be fair, the Blazers were always his main love, he bought the Hawks as more of a civic duty as a Seattle native to keep the team in Seattle was the story we always heard. He was just way more into basketball than football.

In Seattle, he never did these. It was always the GM & head coach that fielded questions from the media. He appeared to be very hands off with the Hawks. But wasn't afraid to hire the best Football people & coaches (Mike Holmgren & Carroll) to run the show. Which is why he remained popular among fans.

The only time you saw Paul was during a game telecast, when he was in his suite or when he would raise the 12th man flag for pregame. That's the only time he was visible for fans. No public interviews.

Jody avoids the spotlight as well. So, fans in Seattle don't really take issue with her either.


I may not have this exactly right, but I seem to remember a story about when PA released his book about his life story, someone in the area on sports radio had read it and said there was like either multiple pages or a whole paragraph dedicated to the Blazers. The Seahawks only got like a single paragraph about when they were up for sale and him buying them for the city of Seattle essentially.

Football was just never his passion, so he seemed more content to let the football guys do their thing. With the Blazers and basketball, his passion was to be there for all the draft stuff and be a lot more hands on.
Get ready to learn Chinese buddy... #YangBang
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,410
And1: 8,106
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Breaking: Blazers sold to Tom Dundon 

Post#45 » by Wizenheimer » Thu Aug 14, 2025 4:13 am

DusterBuster wrote:
m0ng0 wrote:The beautiful historical relic called the memorial coliseum, would be my guess


The NBA won't let the Blazers play for 2-3 seasons in Memorial, give me a break. If anything, they need to tear down Memorial for the new arena vs remodel.

I'm not going to be a Debby Downer about a move right now. Most all signs point to something getting figured out. What it is, we'll see, but literally no one close to this is indicating that's on anyones mind right now. He's putting people in the ownership group that have local ties, which is part of a good faith sign of intentions to keep the team in Portland.

If you want to be a never-say-never person, have at it (talking to Wiz here or anyone else).

There will be negotiations, it might get contentions, but just reading the tea leafs and comparing what he did with the Hurricanes and the area around the arena, it seems pretty clear part of why he wants the Blazers is that area in Portland ripe for the same thing he did in Carolina.

We still probably got 6mo before this sale is even approved too.


sure sounds like about all that is left is a vote by the owners/board-of-governors approving the sale. They meet several times a year. They usually have a meeting in Vegas during summer league (they had it last month) and another meeting a month or so before the season starts. They can also have an 'emergency' meeting if there is pressing business. Not sure if a team being sold is pressing business

so sure, 6 months might be a reasonable time frame. But it could happen sooner. The NBA might want to get a new owner in place before the season starts
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 36,382
And1: 22,074
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
   

Re: Breaking: Blazers sold to Tom Dundon 

Post#46 » by DusterBuster » Thu Aug 14, 2025 4:33 am

Wizenheimer wrote:
DusterBuster wrote:
m0ng0 wrote:The beautiful historical relic called the memorial coliseum, would be my guess


The NBA won't let the Blazers play for 2-3 seasons in Memorial, give me a break. If anything, they need to tear down Memorial for the new arena vs remodel.

I'm not going to be a Debby Downer about a move right now. Most all signs point to something getting figured out. What it is, we'll see, but literally no one close to this is indicating that's on anyones mind right now. He's putting people in the ownership group that have local ties, which is part of a good faith sign of intentions to keep the team in Portland.

If you want to be a never-say-never person, have at it (talking to Wiz here or anyone else).

There will be negotiations, it might get contentions, but just reading the tea leafs and comparing what he did with the Hurricanes and the area around the arena, it seems pretty clear part of why he wants the Blazers is that area in Portland ripe for the same thing he did in Carolina.

We still probably got 6mo before this sale is even approved too.


sure sounds like about all that is left is a vote by the owners/board-of-governors approving the sale. They meet several times a year. They usually have a meeting in Vegas during summer league (they had it last month) and another meeting a month or so before the season starts. They can also have an 'emergency' meeting if there is pressing business. Not sure if a team being sold is pressing business

so sure, 6 months might be a reasonable time frame. But it could happen sooner. The NBA might want to get a new owner in place before the season starts[/quote]

I kind of doubt it just based off what we've seen. I mean, the leagues two biggest franchises by a mile have both been sold in the last 2 years, Lakers and Celtics. They didn't rush any of those through.

Oddly enough, the Celtics sale finalized literally a few hours ago. I just found that out to make sure I had my dates right: https://www.nba.com/news/nba-approves-sale-of-boston-celtics. It was March 20th when he agreed to buy the team - so basically a similar match to todays Blazer announcement. So about 5-6mo seems to be the timeline from sale announcement to agreed to, and that's assuming nothing goes wonky in the process.

The Lakers are still in their middle-process of sale+buyer announced, but not finalized yet. If they didn't rush the Lakers or Celtics sales, I can't imagine they would rush the Blazers.

The Suns sale was finalized mid-season 2023 in Feb.

The NBA seasons seem to play no real baring on when these things get finalized.
Get ready to learn Chinese buddy... #YangBang
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,410
And1: 8,106
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Breaking: Blazers sold to Tom Dundon 

Post#47 » by Wizenheimer » Thu Aug 14, 2025 4:40 am

DusterBuster wrote:
Wizenheimer wrote:
DusterBuster wrote:
The NBA won't let the Blazers play for 2-3 seasons in Memorial, give me a break. If anything, they need to tear down Memorial for the new arena vs remodel.

I'm not going to be a Debby Downer about a move right now. Most all signs point to something getting figured out. What it is, we'll see, but literally no one close to this is indicating that's on anyones mind right now. He's putting people in the ownership group that have local ties, which is part of a good faith sign of intentions to keep the team in Portland.

If you want to be a never-say-never person, have at it (talking to Wiz here or anyone else).

There will be negotiations, it might get contentions, but just reading the tea leafs and comparing what he did with the Hurricanes and the area around the arena, it seems pretty clear part of why he wants the Blazers is that area in Portland ripe for the same thing he did in Carolina.

We still probably got 6mo before this sale is even approved too.


sure sounds like about all that is left is a vote by the owners/board-of-governors approving the sale. They meet several times a year. They usually have a meeting in Vegas during summer league (they had it last month) and another meeting a month or so before the season starts. They can also have an 'emergency' meeting if there is pressing business. Not sure if a team being sold is pressing business

so sure, 6 months might be a reasonable time frame. But it could happen sooner. The NBA might want to get a new owner in place before the season starts[/quote]

I kind of doubt it just based off what we've seen. I mean, the leagues two biggest franchises by a mile have both been sold in the last 2 years, Lakers and Celtics. They didn't rush any of those through.

Oddly enough, the Celtics sale finalized literally a few hours ago. I just found that out to make sure I had my dates right: https://www.nba.com/news/nba-approves-sale-of-boston-celtics. It was March 20th when he agreed to buy the team - so basically a similar match to todays Blazer announcement. So about 5-6mo seems to be the timeline from sale announcement to agreed to, and that's assuming nothing goes wonky in the process.

The Lakers are still in their middle-process of sale+buyer announced, but not finalized yet. If they didn't rush the Lakers or Celtics sales, I can't imagine they would rush the Blazers.

The Suns sale was finalized mid-season 2023 in Feb.

The NBA seasons seem to play no real baring on when these things get finalized.


you may be right...might take months. I'd imagine the sales contract has about a bazillion pages and hundreds of lawyers need to analyze and parse every sing word
Norm2953
RealGM
Posts: 16,485
And1: 2,222
Joined: May 17, 2003
Location: Oregon

Re: Breaking: Blazers sold to Tom Dundon 

Post#48 » by Norm2953 » Thu Aug 14, 2025 4:44 am

One would think everything has been worked out and they are waiting for the league to approve the sale.

It'll be interesting to see if the city allows the new owner to finally remove the Coliseum
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,217
And1: 3,149
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

Re: Breaking: Blazers sold to Tom Dundon 

Post#49 » by PDXKnight » Thu Aug 14, 2025 5:08 am

Norm2953 wrote:One would think everything has been worked out and they are waiting for the league to approve the sale.

It'll be interesting to see if the city allows the new owner to finally remove the Coliseum


You'd think thats an option at this point if you can sell someone on keeping the team in the same spot. Seems much easier than any more grandiose plana. Also would be kinda cool if our new arena lay in the ashes of where we won it all in 77.

Do we keep moda at that point or tear it down? If theyre trying to build up the entire area may make more sense to tear it down at that point who knows..
DaVoiceMaster
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,121
And1: 2,421
Joined: Sep 26, 2003
Contact:
   

Re: Breaking: Blazers sold to Tom Dundon 

Post#50 » by DaVoiceMaster » Thu Aug 14, 2025 7:52 am

I dont know if anyone can touch the Coliseum. Someone got it listed as a historical site when there was talk about tearing it down and building a baseball stadium there.
DaVoiceMaster
Senior Mod - Trail Blazers
12/27/2017 - 01/03/2018
zzaj
General Manager
Posts: 9,158
And1: 3,699
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
 

Re: Breaking: Blazers sold to Tom Dundon 

Post#51 » by zzaj » Thu Aug 14, 2025 5:10 pm

DaVoiceMaster wrote:I dont know if anyone can touch the Coliseum. Someone got it listed as a historical site when there was talk about tearing it down and building a baseball stadium there.


My understanding is that although it is on the HR, it can still be demolished in certain situations.

Not going to overreact to TD…Seems a good thing that the group appears committed to keeping the team in PDX, with a history to back that up.

I don’t love how hands-on TD seems to be—I’m more a fan of the ‘surround yourself with good basketball people’ type…but there likely were much, much worse outcomes. I was a bit worried it was going to be sold to an overseas conglomerate.

I expect he’ll keep management things in place until the team underperforms, in which case his history suggests he’ll clean house if a winning product isn’t getting delivered.

The thing I’m pretty excited for…and fingers crossed it works out this way…is new ownership embracing former players in a way that Vulcan/Kolde seemed to never do. Not sure how that would look, and it may be wishful thinking…

Arena? Who knows. There isn’t an obvious solution that works for all parties. We’ll just have to wait and see. My best guess is that TD will push to have the MC demolished and use that land to build up businesses, while the Rose Garden undergoes a years long renovation during the summers. But again, who knows…cross that bridge when it comes, I guess.
wco81
RealGM
Posts: 26,799
And1: 11,460
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: Breaking: Blazers sold to Tom Dundon 

Post#52 » by wco81 » Thu Aug 14, 2025 6:35 pm

Maybe they will announce something in October when the Moda Center hits the 30th anniversary of opening.
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 36,382
And1: 22,074
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
   

Re: Breaking: Blazers sold to Tom Dundon 

Post#53 » by DusterBuster » Thu Aug 14, 2025 7:03 pm

zzaj wrote:
DaVoiceMaster wrote:I dont know if anyone can touch the Coliseum. Someone got it listed as a historical site when there was talk about tearing it down and building a baseball stadium there.


My understanding is that although it is on the HR, it can still be demolished in certain situations.

Not going to overreact to TD…Seems a good thing that the group appears committed to keeping the team in PDX, with a history to back that up.

I don’t love how hands-on TD seems to be—I’m more a fan of the ‘surround yourself with good basketball people’ type…but there likely were much, much worse outcomes. I was a bit worried it was going to be sold to an overseas conglomerate.

I expect he’ll keep management things in place until the team underperforms, in which case his history suggests he’ll clean house if a winning product isn’t getting delivered.

The thing I’m pretty excited for…and fingers crossed it works out this way…is new ownership embracing former players in a way that Vulcan/Kolde seemed to never do. Not sure how that would look, and it may be wishful thinking…

Arena? Who knows. There isn’t an obvious solution that works for all parties. We’ll just have to wait and see. My best guess is that TD will push to have the MC demolished and use that land to build up businesses, while the Rose Garden undergoes a years long renovation during the summers. But again, who knows…cross that bridge when it comes, I guess.


I think this is a really fair all-around viewpoint. Cautious optimism is what I keep coming back to.

I think the net worth of owners is a bit overstated. Clay Bennett is only worth around 400mil by what I can find on Google. The Thunder, in their history under his ownership, have barely missed the playoffs and have a title now. He's been able to pay players when he needs to and lets his GM do his thing (helps he has a great GM, but I digress). An owner who knows how to get things done will get things done, regardless of the net worth.

The hands-on thing is a fair concern, I share it, I also wonder just how "hands on" he will be owning two franchises and both leagues running at roughly the same time. Paul owned two franchises, but realistically, he gave a disproportionate amount of this attention to the Blazers vs the Hawks according to more records of the situation. Will Tom focus his attention on the Blazers more of Hurricanes more? Only time will tell. For what it's worth, there is interviews out there of Tom saying almost the exact phrase of ‘surround yourself with good basketball people’ quote you made. Unfortunately I can't find that link rn to post it, saw it yesterday on X. Its him sitting in a room that looks like a Beer Fridge doing a zoom interview likely with a radio affiliate in NC. We just gotta take a wait and see on the "hands on" part of this, but from comments I heard him say to the media, he seems to want more of a collaborative approach to decision making - not like a Vivek (which is my personal nightmare... STAUSKAS!),

I definitely agree with you, I don't think he's going to come in and clean house on Day 1. Especially if the sale is approved mid-season or close to the deadline. I suspect - one the sale is finalized - he's going to get input from Cronin and Schmidtz about what the teams MO has been for roster building thus far. Because of likely the operating status quo under the Vulcans being DRASTICALLY different than what he wants to do, I suspect he will want to give them time to see if the current staff can execute on it.

One thing Cronin really has going for him as far as buying time goes, he's got the team in a good financial spot AND they have assets to go out and do something. If Tom comes in and says, use these assets to get something to make us significantly better next season (26/27)... say the new-owner splashy move (that almost never works, but I digress)... if Cronin does his "OK, we're going all in it's gonna hurt" thing again but ends up doing nothing... I think he's gonna have a short leash there. Long way to say, I think Cronin gets a year roughly to show his worth.

Billups... I'm less sold getting that much leash. I think he the team is just another 30win team, Billups may be the first casualty at the end of the season - even with the extension. By its nature, the job of GM lends itself to needing more time to evaluate than coaching does. Tom is probably smart enough to understand what the teams previous operating philosophy was - but at the same time, not cracking 40 wins in almost 5 years of coaching shouldn't be acceptable.

And like you said, the arena things is just way to early to make any guesses at right now. The city and Tom's group is saying all the right things you would hope to hear. I think there's real desire to keep the team here. When rubber meets the road in negotiations - we'll see what happens. I think the city will do what is asked in the end. The economical impact of losing the only big 4 sports team in a city like Portland is just too great. Portland isn't Seattle. Seattle had MLB and NFL in addition to the NBA when the Sonics moved. So yes, they lost a lot of history in that move and a big fanbase, but they had other pro leagues to fall back on to blunt that loss a little (not to diminish the pain for any Sonic fans, but its true and probably why Seattle government acted like it did). Portland, OR doesn't have that luxury of having other pro leagues to fall back on (sorry Timber fans). So I don't give government much credit for anything in Portland or the state of Oregon (as no one should), but I do think when push comes to shove, they'll figure something out. Maybe foolish optimism on my part, but...

Overall, I still believe big reason why Dundon purchased the team is he's trying to just replicate what he did for the Hurricanes. The team and local area around the arena are very similar, almost 1:1 from when he purchased them. There will obviously be some differing local politics to juggle around to do what he wants to do, but overall enough similarities I think he feels he has the blueprint to almost fully copy-and-paste the model he did for them here.

Reality is, none of us are going to feel 100% safe and secure with the situation until after the fact. There's always going to be things to worry and clutch our pearls over in the unknown... such is life. Just gotta ride it out and see where it goes, and take encouragement where you can with what information we have - which at its current state - is all pointing in the direction we would want.
Get ready to learn Chinese buddy... #YangBang
oldfishermen
Senior
Posts: 679
And1: 266
Joined: Sep 08, 2010

Re: Breaking: Blazers sold to Tom Dundon 

Post#54 » by oldfishermen » Thu Aug 14, 2025 8:49 pm

Before making an offer, Dundon should have made a complete inspection of all aspects of the team. As part of his due diligence, he should have had individual meetings with management, including Cronin and Billups.

My guess, Dundon already has a starting plan for the team in mind.

As far as Dundon developing businesses around the arena, I urge caution. North Carolina is ranked one of the most business friendly states. Oregon is ranked one of the least business friendly states, and they are pround of that.
GEE
Starter
Posts: 2,416
And1: 369
Joined: Aug 04, 2006

Re: Breaking: Blazers sold to Tom Dundon 

Post#55 » by GEE » Thu Aug 14, 2025 9:48 pm

DaVoiceMaster wrote:I dont know if anyone can touch the Coliseum. Someone got it listed as a historical site when there was talk about tearing it down and building a baseball stadium there.


I think the issue above, and the potential to re-visit it and hopefully overturn this decision is as exciting to me, as getting rid of the Vulcans. Well... almost.

For as long as I can remember, I've been baffled by the love for the Memorial Coliseum. It's a relic, and I as a Honorable Veteran am quite OK with not "Tearing it down", or "Demolishing it", but rather "Recycling it". All that glass and metal should be melted down and then reused for a FREAKIN' BASEBALL STADIUM. I think all of my fellow Veterans may feel the same.

I've even gone as far as looking at the arial photos of the area, dreaming of what it could be turned into. Imagine baseballs being hit into the Willamete river. I can. Along with a new arena for the Blazers... I can envision that too. The PPS building IMO is the one to go.

First, "Recycle" the MC and play in the Moda for now. Eventually building a new arena AND baseball stadium with the lightrail running through it, redeveloping that whole area on a massive scale. Lloyd Center could also be bought up in part of the overall project (Private and City), Leveled to create space for a major Hotel possibly. There are several other potential sites around that area as well that I'd imagine could be "Repurposd".

Overall... excited to have a new vision brought to the table. Hopefully he knows how to work the local (dummy) politicians.
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 36,382
And1: 22,074
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
   

Re: Breaking: Blazers sold to Tom Dundon 

Post#56 » by DusterBuster » Thu Aug 14, 2025 11:33 pm

A really great interview with a Hurricanes insider/podcaster in NC here:



Starts at 2hr 20min mark. The guy seemed to really know Tom well and what kind of exec he is.

Some standout comments:

*He's more likely than not to clean house Day 1. He doesn't have much patience for losing, so if the team is bad again this year, Billups and Cronin might be best to start looking around the league for other opportunities. He's someone who'd sooner have his guys than let a previous regime keep going, especially if that previous regime doesn't have much to show for itself. So positive news for fans who just want a total fresh start, from this guys prospect, that's probably the more likely outcome when he takes control.

*He's less micromanage-y than he was when he first bought the team. Those critiques are pretty outdated from when he was a new owner, at least as far as the NHL goes. Same with his being a hard ass in negotiations, that's softened a lot too.

*Expect him to jettison nearly every current team media personalities. Brooke, Holdal, Colabaro, Hurd... might all be outta here Day 1.

*Tom holds absolutely nothing to sentimentality. All he cares about is whats on the court and what can be done TODAY. The reporter said the Dame signing was something he NEVER would have done in a million years. So for anyone holding out hope of Dundon reconnecting with the teams history and past - don't hold your breath on that. At least for now, don't expect any real loyalty to anyone or anything from the Blazers past, he'll be 100% concerned about the present and future of the team.

*He'll likely be more involved with the Blazers than Hurricanes once the sale is finalized. Hurricanes are essentially on cruise control these days and don't require as much handholding to operate.

*He is patent, he wants a winner, but he doesn't make rash decisions. He creates a plan and follows that plan and doesn't take shortcuts along the way. He also WILL pay players when he needs to, there should be no concern over him being cheap.

So the TL:DR;

*Billups and Cronin are more likely than not to be shown the door with another losing season.
*If Dame isn't really productive and helpful next year, don't be shocked if they cold-hearted trade or cut him before his 3rd year, new ownership will likely have no reverence or appreciation for him like the Vulcan team did if they can still get assets for him.
*Probably gonna hear all new voices covering the team across the board.
Get ready to learn Chinese buddy... #YangBang
wco81
RealGM
Posts: 26,799
And1: 11,460
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: Breaking: Blazers sold to Tom Dundon 

Post#57 » by wco81 » Thu Aug 14, 2025 11:50 pm

Why a baseball stadium? Portland has a minor league team or is looking to poach an MLB team from another city?
Tim Lehrbach
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,111
And1: 4,379
Joined: Jul 29, 2001
   

Re: Breaking: Blazers sold to Tom Dundon 

Post#58 » by Tim Lehrbach » Fri Aug 15, 2025 1:17 am

Just to clarify, the Memorial Coliseum's designation on the National Register of Historic Places does not in any way affect the ability to demolish it. The NRHP provides recognition and financial incentives for preservation, not restrictions against renovation or demolition. The property can be removed from the Register at any time, including by virtue of being destroyed.
Clipsz 4 Life
January 20, 2002-May 17, 2006
Saxon
February 20, 2001-August 9, 2007
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,938
And1: 14,275
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Breaking: Blazers sold to Tom Dundon 

Post#59 » by JRoy » Fri Aug 15, 2025 3:52 am

GEE wrote:
DaVoiceMaster wrote:I dont know if anyone can touch the Coliseum. Someone got it listed as a historical site when there was talk about tearing it down and building a baseball stadium there.


I think the issue above, and the potential to re-visit it and hopefully overturn this decision is as exciting to me, as getting rid of the Vulcans. Well... almost.

For as long as I can remember, I've been baffled by the love for the Memorial Coliseum. It's a relic, and I as a Honorable Veteran am quite OK with not "Tearing it down", or "Demolishing it", but rather "Recycling it". All that glass and metal should be melted down and then reused for a FREAKIN' BASEBALL STADIUM. I think all of my fellow Veterans may feel the same.

I've even gone as far as looking at the arial photos of the area, dreaming of what it could be turned into. Imagine baseballs being hit into the Willamete river. I can. Along with a new arena for the Blazers... I can envision that too. The PPS building IMO is the one to go.

First, "Recycle" the MC and play in the Moda for now. Eventually building a new arena AND baseball stadium with the lightrail running through it, redeveloping that whole area on a massive scale. Lloyd Center could also be bought up in part of the overall project (Private and City), Leveled to create space for a major Hotel possibly. There are several other potential sites around that area as well that I'd imagine could be "Repurposd".

Overall... excited to have a new vision brought to the table. Hopefully he knows how to work the local (dummy) politicians.


Not this vet.

Lot of memories in that building.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
tester551
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,574
And1: 1,283
Joined: Jan 10, 2005
Location: Missing the Coast & Trees

Re: Breaking: Blazers sold to Tom Dundon 

Post#60 » by tester551 » Fri Aug 15, 2025 4:04 am

oldfishermen wrote:Before making an offer, Dundon should have made a complete inspection of all aspects of the team. As part of his due diligence, he should have had individual meetings with management, including Cronin and Billups.

Thats not how business deals are done. Typically you make your offer and once you come to terms... THEN you do your due diligence.

I would expect everyone to keep it confidential until the DD period is over (so Dundon SHOULD have completed that step already)....

Return to Portland Trail Blazers