Wizenheimer wrote:HoopsFanAZ wrote:Simons (and Nas + overpay) for OG + filler is NOT going to make some Blazers fans real happy. Ant is a 3-pointer and a bucket. He’s really frickin’ good. Dame-lite. BUT for roster construction — 3&D with switchable and age (OG at 25) — after Bridges, OG fits best.
Bridges is an overpay — an offer they couldn’t refuse of Ant + Nas + PICKS PICKS PICKS …
Siakam is going to get paid and is more PF than SF … not quite the defender
DDR is older, lack of 3’s less defense than others
Brown would be more of a trade for Dame than to play beside him
OG fits and can opt out in a year … Toronto needs to make some player and salary moves. It’s not the BIG move with the name — Brown and Bridges — but it’s a strong move to win.
Dame-Scoot-Sharpe
OG-Grant
Nurkic
Thybulle, Trendon, Murray, Eubanks, Walker, Rupert, Badji … still work to do on the bench
I’m picking this hill to die on. That team has a shot with OG making forward a strength NOT a weakness.
I don't agree with your glowing appraisal of Simons. He does a few things well but overall he's a flawed player with some significant limitations, and I think he has narrow value across the 30 NBA team landscape
that said, what he does bring to the floor might appeal to 3 or 4 teams, and Toronto might be one of those. They may be losing FVV and will have a hole at PG. Ant has generally poor PG skills and vision, but they may be good enough to plug into Toronto's starting lineup. Between the two of them, Siakam and Barnes averaged nearly 11 assists/game last season so the Raptors have good facilitation skills at wing, and Ant's catch & shoot ability would complement that. Ant + future 1st, top-7 to top-10 protected seems fair
the problem is Masai Ujiri. There seems to be widespread belief out there that 29 NBA front offices have found him nearly impossible to work with. I've seen rumors that the Blazer front office got pretty sour about Ujiri last year when they were discussing an OG trade for #7
Masai Ujiri is a royal pain. I would expect an overpay in picks, absolutely. As to a “glowing” description of Simons? Really frickin’ good for a 20+ ppg … 24-year-old athletic guard whose 3 level scoring has definitely improved … and approaching 50-40-90 efficiency is uncommon … sooooo, glowing? And I agree with all of his limitations and likely limitations moving forward … we disagree on his value at least a bit.










