ImageImage

Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything?

Moderators: Moonbeam, DeBlazerRiddem

Butter
General Manager
Posts: 8,746
And1: 398
Joined: Aug 14, 2002
Location: Youth movement, here we come
 

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#521 » by Butter » Tue Dec 31, 2024 10:35 pm

Walton1one wrote:Cronin full interview before PHI game

[url][/url]

Some comments of note:

Thought that team has taken consistent steps, focus is on high steps, what they are capable of

Need to improve consistency, raise the floor, be competitive on a nightly basis

Likes the progress of Scoot's shooting?

Happy with where Sharpe is at, game has taken the next step, particularly in ball screens\pick & roll. He is a leader in efficiency & pts per 36min in the clutch?

What skillsets do we need to add, what personalities, how do they complement the core base (me: what IS the core base?)

Camara, seeing his offensive game unlock more.

Happy with the talent leap they have taken from LY, A lot more talented now (me: really? record does not indicate that at all). Hoping to be much more talented 12 months from now

Anfernee one of the best clutch players in the league (me: that is straight up ridiculous)

Trade deadline:
- Mentality is pro-active (me: we will see)
- Like to be aggressive
- Aware of how important trades are for roster construction for this team
- We always approach trade deadline\offseason as actively as we can\turn over every rock, see what deals make sense for us (me: there is the sentence to focus on, what makes sense to you Joe? Is it even reasonable?)
- No immediacy (me: yikes), if it makes sense we will look at it, if it doesn't, we won't (me: can't wait to hear him explain yet again why no\little moves were made)
- We feel like we can be patient (me: Concerning, that sounds like someone not inclined to make moves, which has been the concern of many)
- Player development is the most important thing we do. Used Rupert\Murray as examples, couldn't crack rotation LY, now are flirting with the rotation (me: Really? Seems like they are firmly NOT in the rotation)

:banghead:


It sounds to me like Cronin is selling patience.
I wouldn't be surprised if he waits till the off season to leverage the shorter contracts.
Rip City, baby!!!!
Walton1one
Starter
Posts: 2,189
And1: 1,225
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#522 » by Walton1one » Tue Dec 31, 2024 10:55 pm

Here is a 3-team idea:

- ATL, just lost Nance Jr for awhile, already in the market for help
- DEN, well known they are looking for some vet help, looks like CHI deal not happening
- POR, RW3 most likely to go m, preference for players over picks apparently

POR sends RW3 & (1) of Walker\Reath\Banton\Murray to ATL
+ Rupert to DEN

ATL sends Jokic’s Serbian teammate Bogdanovic to DEN

DEN sends Strawther, Watson, Nnaji & Saric to POR
cucad8
Head Coach
Posts: 7,285
And1: 1,409
Joined: May 27, 2007

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#523 » by cucad8 » Tue Dec 31, 2024 11:10 pm

Walton1one wrote:Here is a 3-team idea:

- ATL, just lost Nance Jr for awhile, already in the market for help
- DEN, well known they are looking for some vet help, looks like CHI deal not happening
- POR, RW3 most likely to go m, preference for players over picks apparently

POR sends RW3 & (1) of Walker\Reath\Banton\Murray to ATL
+ Rupert to DEN

ATL sends Jokic’s Serbian teammate Bogdanovic to DEN

DEN sends Strawther, Watson, Nnaji & Saric to POR


Good God no. That's pretty awful for us.
Walton1one
Starter
Posts: 2,189
And1: 1,225
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#524 » by Walton1one » Tue Dec 31, 2024 11:22 pm

Draft picks could level compensation if needed, however I think both Strawther & Watson (both 22) are up and coming young guys worth trading for.

To be honest, I am not sure DEN would do this deal, both are playing a fair amount of minutes (20/24), although Bogdanovic, if healthy would be a clear upgrade and they don’t have to include any draft, of which they have a little
dckingsfan
RealGM
Posts: 34,798
And1: 20,371
Joined: May 28, 2010

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#525 » by dckingsfan » Wed Jan 1, 2025 1:10 am

Walton1one wrote:Here is a 3-team idea:

- ATL, just lost Nance Jr for awhile, already in the market for help
- DEN, well known they are looking for some vet help, looks like CHI deal not happening
- POR, RW3 most likely to go m, preference for players over picks apparently

POR sends RW3 & (1) of Walker\Reath\Banton\Murray to ATL
+ Rupert to DEN

ATL sends Jokic’s Serbian teammate Bogdanovic to DEN

DEN sends Strawther, Watson, Nnaji & Saric to POR

Cut out Denver and Williams for Nance + 2 or 3 SRPs?
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,359
And1: 8,067
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#526 » by Wizenheimer » Wed Jan 1, 2025 2:31 am

Walton1one wrote:Here is a 3-team idea:

- ATL, just lost Nance Jr for awhile, already in the market for help
- DEN, well known they are looking for some vet help, looks like CHI deal not happening
- POR, RW3 most likely to go m, preference for players over picks apparently

POR sends RW3 & (1) of Walker\Reath\Banton\Murray to ATL
+ Rupert to DEN

ATL sends Jokic’s Serbian teammate Bogdanovic to DEN

DEN sends Strawther, Watson, Nnaji & Saric to POR


I don't see the reason(s) for this trade
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,399
And1: 9,943
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#527 » by BlazersBroncos » Thu Jan 2, 2025 7:23 pm

Hypothetically - if Beal would wave his NTC would anyone else do this?

Bradley Beal + 2031 (UNP) for Jerami Grant + Robert Williams III + Dalano Banton

Then move Simons in a seperate deal.

We cut a year off Grant, but take on the higher AV in Beal. More than anything - we get a UNP future FRP. I dont see us getting 1 protected FRP for either Grant or RWIII - so we combine them and take on the monster Bradley deal to secure that coveted UNP FRP.
Tim Lehrbach
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,111
And1: 4,379
Joined: Jul 29, 2001
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#528 » by Tim Lehrbach » Thu Jan 2, 2025 8:27 pm

BlazersBroncos wrote:Hypothetically - if Beal would wave his NTC would anyone else do this?

Bradley Beal + 2031 (UNP) for Jerami Grant + Robert Williams III + Dalano Banton

Then move Simons in a seperate deal.

We cut a year off Grant, but take on the higher AV in Beal. More than anything - we get a UNP future FRP. I dont see us getting 1 protected FRP for either Grant or RWIII - so we combine them and take on the monster Bradley deal to secure that coveted UNP FRP.

I know I often seem anti-our guys, but here I go anyway: I don't think Phoenix would do that. They've probably accepted that contending is just not happening anymore with this core and are going to wait out those deals, hoping there's still time to build again around Booker.
Clipsz 4 Life
January 20, 2002-May 17, 2006
Saxon
February 20, 2001-August 9, 2007
Walton1one
Starter
Posts: 2,189
And1: 1,225
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#529 » by Walton1one » Thu Jan 2, 2025 11:41 pm

The feeling is SAC is going to make a move. BRK\Cam Johnson are probably the preference, however, BRK wants 1st round pick(s) + Devin Carter. I can't see SAC doing that, in fact I have a hard time seeing SAC trade Carter at all, especially given the rumors swirling about Fox (will he\won't he ask to be dealt).

All indications seem to be that SAC is going to try and make a move to appease Fox\make the playoffs and then if things continue to go south revisit trading Fox in the summer.

Lyles (1yr) & Huerter (2yrs) are actively being shopped

I wonder if POR could find a deal here, either involving Grant or a package of RW3\Thybulle\Reath

Not a lot of young players from SAC that outside of Murray\Carter (whom I doubt they would make available), but Isaac Jones (2-way) is an intriguing young guy to consider)

The obvious ask for POR would be for a (likely protected) 1st, but they also own (4) 2nd rounders (26/27/29/31) and have swaps they could offer (26/27/28/29/30). Would some combination of that work?
DaVoiceMaster
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,092
And1: 2,399
Joined: Sep 26, 2003
Contact:
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#530 » by DaVoiceMaster » Fri Jan 3, 2025 12:40 am

BlazersBroncos wrote:Hypothetically - if Beal would wave his NTC would anyone else do this?

Bradley Beal + 2031 (UNP) for Jerami Grant + Robert Williams III + Dalano Banton

Then move Simons in a seperate deal.

We cut a year off Grant, but take on the higher AV in Beal. More than anything - we get a UNP future FRP. I dont see us getting 1 protected FRP for either Grant or RWIII - so we combine them and take on the monster Bradley deal to secure that coveted UNP FRP.


Nope! I don't want any contracts beyond 2025-26.
DaVoiceMaster
Senior Mod - Trail Blazers
12/27/2017 - 01/03/2018
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,399
And1: 9,943
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#531 » by BlazersBroncos » Fri Jan 3, 2025 1:55 am

DaVoiceMaster wrote:
BlazersBroncos wrote:Hypothetically - if Beal would wave his NTC would anyone else do this?

Bradley Beal + 2031 (UNP) for Jerami Grant + Robert Williams III + Dalano Banton

Then move Simons in a seperate deal.

We cut a year off Grant, but take on the higher AV in Beal. More than anything - we get a UNP future FRP. I dont see us getting 1 protected FRP for either Grant or RWIII - so we combine them and take on the monster Bradley deal to secure that coveted UNP FRP.


Nope! I don't want any contracts beyond 2025-26.


I mean, Grant is actually a longer contract than Beal. It’s going to be rough finding a taker for Jerami that doesn’t return bad money if we want an asset IMO. If we want short money we likely don’t get an asset in a Grant deal.
Walton1one
Starter
Posts: 2,189
And1: 1,225
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#532 » by Walton1one » Fri Jan 3, 2025 3:42 am

So there was apparently interest from DET for Simons in the offseason, with Ivey’s injury & DET trying to make playoffs (currently 9th), I wonder if this would be revisited?

DET is $14mil under the luxury tax so a lopsided deal could work

Something like:
Simons to DET
for
THJ\Klintman
25’ 2nd TOR
28’ 2nd MIA
27’ 1st (top 10 protect, top 3 in 28’, (2) 2nd round picks in 29’)
* This pick will convey two years after DET prior obligation to MIN has been met

POR gets a 1st + a flyer on young player + 1-2 2nd’s

Simons age (25) is appealing here as he could fit with their core long term, good fit next to Cade in the backcourt and his shooting would be helpful for DET, clear step up from THJ able to set the scoring loss of Ivey
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,399
And1: 9,943
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#533 » by BlazersBroncos » Fri Jan 3, 2025 3:26 pm

I would be floored if DET was willing to move one of its own FRP for Simons.

THJ + Klintman + 25 TOR SRP + 28 MIA SRP + 2030 MIN SRP would be more than enough for me. Wouldnt be surprised if DET pushed to hold Klintman out of the deal as well.

Simons might look like a nice fit on paper next to Cade but moving a good package for him must mean Ivey isnt in their long term plans and with the jump he has taken this year that would be wild. They would be trading for Simons as a expensive 6th man who they see as a good value - and that only comes if the cost is low.

FWIW - Malik Beasley is playing lights out as a floor spacer - its arguable the Pistons would be in a better spot starting Simons over Malik (3.8 3PT made per at 41% - 16ppg).
Village Idiot
General Manager
Posts: 9,513
And1: 2,223
Joined: Jan 23, 2005
Location: Madrid, Spain
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#534 » by Village Idiot » Fri Jan 3, 2025 3:58 pm

Orlando is still the natural fit for Simons, especially now with their lack of scoring.

Conveniently, and perhaps not coincidentally, Jonathan Issac was signed to an extension paying him almost the exact same amount this season as Simons. From $25 million this season his compensation declines to only $18 million next and then $14.5 the following two years. Note that next season is only guaranteed for $8 million and the last two are unguaranteed. Not sure what the release date is. Issac can be traded beginning January 6.

The Magic have two first round picks this draft. Their own and Denver's top 3 protected.

The simple deal would be Simons for Issac and the higher of those picks.
"There are no right answers to wrong questions." - Ursula K. Le Guin
User avatar
PDXKnight
RealGM
Posts: 26,174
And1: 3,122
Joined: May 29, 2007
Location: Portland
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#535 » by PDXKnight » Fri Jan 3, 2025 4:18 pm

Village Idiot wrote:Orlando is still the natural fit for Simons, especially now with their lack of scoring.

Conveniently, and perhaps not coincidentally, Jonathan Issac was signed to an extension paying him almost the exact same amount this season as Simons. From $25 million this season his compensation declines to only $18 million next and then $14.5 the following two years. Note that next season is only guaranteed for $8 million and the last two are unguaranteed. Not sure what the release date is. Issac can be traded beginning January 6.

The Magic have two first round picks this draft. Their own and Denver's top 3 protected.

The simple deal would be Simons for Issac and the higher of those picks.


I'll be honest im not sure i want to eat that Isaac contract unless we are offloading Grant in the process. Both contracts seem like bad deals with the current cap issues.
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,399
And1: 9,943
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#536 » by BlazersBroncos » Fri Jan 3, 2025 4:30 pm

Isaac is worth more to ORL than anyone. I expect they would value him at the same level as Simons and refuse to attach a FRP. I know that may sound crazy to us, but its clear the franchise and fan base has a unique evaluation of Isaac.

They would also want to dump Cole if they are bringing in Simons.

Cole, Harris, lower 2025 FRP for Simons would be the deal IMO - and I am not sure ORL would take that. I expect a guy like Sexton looks better to them at this moment.
User avatar
DusterBuster
RealGM
Posts: 36,139
And1: 21,768
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
   

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#537 » by DusterBuster » Fri Jan 3, 2025 5:13 pm

PDXKnight wrote:
Village Idiot wrote:Orlando is still the natural fit for Simons, especially now with their lack of scoring.

Conveniently, and perhaps not coincidentally, Jonathan Issac was signed to an extension paying him almost the exact same amount this season as Simons. From $25 million this season his compensation declines to only $18 million next and then $14.5 the following two years. Note that next season is only guaranteed for $8 million and the last two are unguaranteed. Not sure what the release date is. Issac can be traded beginning January 6.

The Magic have two first round picks this draft. Their own and Denver's top 3 protected.

The simple deal would be Simons for Issac and the higher of those picks.


I'll be honest im not sure i want to eat that Isaac contract unless we are offloading Grant in the process. Both contracts seem like bad deals with the current cap issues.


One of the most under the radar mindblowing NBA things imo is how Issac continued to keep getting paid. Injured most of this rookie deal, get a big extension, injured for most of that contract save his contract expiring season, then gets ANOTHER extension off of that one healthy year... and all for pretty unimpressive numbers / play.
Get ready to learn Chinese buddy... #YangBang
Wizenheimer
RealGM
Posts: 36,359
And1: 8,067
Joined: May 28, 2007

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#538 » by Wizenheimer » Fri Jan 3, 2025 5:25 pm

I think Portland's veteran assets are simply too-flawed+too-expensive to expect returning any 1st round picks, unless they are heavily protected, 1 or 2 year obligations, with less than even odds of conveying. 1st round picks in name only

Joe drove the Blazer hybrid deep into a dead-end alley; there's no room to turn around and backing out is going to make dents and scrape paint. And that would require a good driver and I'm not sure Cronin has the skills

Simons-Ayton-Grant-Timelord-Thybulle....116M/year in dead weight contracts for a rebuilding team. If some expiring salary and 2nd round picks are available for any of these guys Cronin should jump on the opportunity...but he won't, IMO

Portland is on a pace for 26-27 wins, and that's with those veterans. Right now they are 6th in the lottery seeding. 6th has a 37% chance of a top-4 pick, but a 54% chance of being 7th or lower. Going by winshares, those veterans have added 4 wins. Why add those wins? That's a question the GM should have answered in the off-season but apparently didn't
BlazersBroncos
RealGM
Posts: 12,399
And1: 9,943
Joined: Oct 27, 2016

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#539 » by BlazersBroncos » Fri Jan 3, 2025 5:44 pm

DusterBuster wrote:
PDXKnight wrote:
Village Idiot wrote:Orlando is still the natural fit for Simons, especially now with their lack of scoring.

Conveniently, and perhaps not coincidentally, Jonathan Issac was signed to an extension paying him almost the exact same amount this season as Simons. From $25 million this season his compensation declines to only $18 million next and then $14.5 the following two years. Note that next season is only guaranteed for $8 million and the last two are unguaranteed. Not sure what the release date is. Issac can be traded beginning January 6.

The Magic have two first round picks this draft. Their own and Denver's top 3 protected.

The simple deal would be Simons for Issac and the higher of those picks.


I'll be honest im not sure i want to eat that Isaac contract unless we are offloading Grant in the process. Both contracts seem like bad deals with the current cap issues.


One of the most under the radar mindblowing NBA things imo is how Issac continued to keep getting paid. Injured most of this rookie deal, get a big extension, injured for most of that contract save his contract expiring season, then gets ANOTHER extension off of that one healthy year... and all for pretty unimpressive numbers / play.


His advanced numbers are very good. Even this year, a bit down after last, he is posting .126 WS/48 and a 1.7 DBPM. They simply love his defensive versatility.
Walton1one
Starter
Posts: 2,189
And1: 1,225
Joined: Jul 05, 2023
 

Re: Ayton, Grant, and Simons for anything? 

Post#540 » by Walton1one » Fri Jan 3, 2025 7:14 pm

As someone who is on the get Simons out of here brigade and not a fan of Cronin at all, I am going to disagree with the prevailing sentiment here and elsewhere that ALL of POR vets are not worth much. I just flat out disagree with that sentiment.

I think especially with POR fans, we get to see their play (and flaws) every day and I know it has left me jaded about their value, but as another poster on this board posted a while back, teams do not view these players under the same lens that we do, and teams generally don't discount the worth of players b\c 30 games into a season they are not performing as they have historically, I just don't think that is how this works.

I also think it would be unwise to think that teams are not aware of the situation in POR regarding the veteran players:
- That Ant wants out
- That Grant knows he is on the trading block
- That RW3 (and Thybulle) are just playing out their contracts until they can sign elsewhere

Do you really think these vets are going to go 110% knowing their and the team's current situation? I surely don't. They are just going through the motions for the most part, until they are inevitably shut down for tank season, AGAIN.

Also, everyone wants to talk about a depressed trading market b\c DFS went for (3) 2nd's, however very few even bother to note WHY BRK opted for the LAL over MEM deal in the first place. The fact they had (4) 1st's in 25' already (3) likely in the 20's. The fact that MEM wanted BRK 25' 2nd back, which esesntially was a swap of about 10-15 spots, or that they had to take non-expiring salary back (Konchar) which they clearly are avoiding.

So DFS WAS worth a 1st, BRK just elected NOT to take that deal b\c it did not meet THEIR priorities.

Lastly, I think that this whole CBA talk and how it is going to cause teams to not want to take on big contracts or give value (1st round picks/young players) for them is WAY overblown at this point. As is the "fear" of 1st apron, which is not as restrictive as many are claiming it to be, the 2nd apron? Yeah, stay away from that unless you are at the endgame (championship or bust), but trading with a team above the 1st apron basically means they have to send out more than they take in and IF they are "hard capped" (5 teams - DEN\LAL\MIA\NYK\PHI) the amount they send back to a team under the apron must be within 110% (instead of 125%), these are not as restrictive to making a deal as some would believe.

I do think teams generally would like to avoid LONG TERM (3+ years) high $$ obligations, that makes some practical sense, but then again it is all dependent on what that team's salary structure & timeline is.

That is why IMO, Grant may likely be the hardest to move given he has 3yrs left @ $32/$34/$36 (player option, ugh), trading him is going to require the right team.

DA would be 2nd hardest IMO, but he is also a FA after NEXT season ($35mil) so a team looking to take advantage of a large expiring deal to clear salary off their books, COULD have interest, but IMO probably not until next offseason at the earliest

Simons, RW3, Thybulle IMO are all very tradeable, depending how reasonable Cronin is about their value. I think Simons and RW3 can get a protected 1st back, Thybulle 1-2 2nd's

Simons is an expiring $27mil next year and the salary this year, less that 1/3 season in is at an already pro-rated cost ($16mil) to the team acquiring him. Oh yeah, and he is actually pretty good on the court.

Young (25), only has 1yr left on his current deal ($27mil), and is a career 38.1% 3pt shooter on high volume (6.2/att) and has averaged over 20ppg over the last 2 years. He is a volume scorer and good outside shooter, PLENTY of teams have a use for that and 1yr of a contract is negligible to most teams.

He would be a clear upgrade for MANY teams (DET\ORL are obvious), and both those teams could likely acquire him w\o negatively affecting their core rotation, which would also be beneficial.

Return to Portland Trail Blazers