Walton1one wrote:But he fits their apparent archetype, 6'7-6'9 forwards who are athletic but cannot shoot.
the irony is they do have a 6'8 forward who is a very good shooter and he's the player most likely to be traded
Moderators: Moonbeam, DeBlazerRiddem
Walton1one wrote:But he fits their apparent archetype, 6'7-6'9 forwards who are athletic but cannot shoot.
Walton1one wrote:Yeah, a 30yr old one who is owed $29/$32/$34/$36 over the next few years, and takes the last few months of the season off every year.
Walton1one wrote:and Grant should be on the trading block regardless of POR shooting woes, A 30-year-old forward on a team focused on their young core makes no sense, just like not drafting shooters to go around Scoot, and a team with atrocious outside shooting is also ridiculous/short sighted
zzaj wrote:Walton1one wrote:and Grant should be on the trading block regardless of POR shooting woes, A 30-year-old forward on a team focused on their young core makes no sense, just like not drafting shooters to go around Scoot, and a team with atrocious outside shooting is also ridiculous/short sighted
While I agree that Grant should be traded, for me he's a little bit down the to-do list. He's not blocking anyone's development and he'll be a good outlet for both Scoot and Deni. Potentially Clingan, too...
IMO, Simons contract, and everything surrounding his end of season comments and Cronin's snub make him the #1 on the trade block. Gotta get in front of that before his value plummets even further than it already is...which is pretty low.
Walton1one wrote:zzaj wrote:Walton1one wrote:and Grant should be on the trading block regardless of POR shooting woes, A 30-year-old forward on a team focused on their young core makes no sense, just like not drafting shooters to go around Scoot, and a team with atrocious outside shooting is also ridiculous/short sighted
While I agree that Grant should be traded, for me he's a little bit down the to-do list. He's not blocking anyone's development and he'll be a good outlet for both Scoot and Deni. Potentially Clingan, too...
IMO, Simons contract, and everything surrounding his end of season comments and Cronin's snub make him the #1 on the trade block. Gotta get in front of that before his value plummets even further than it already is...which is pretty low.
I agree.
Priority should be:
1) Simons - Trading him clears up the back-court issue, it puts\makes the Scoot\Sharpe tandem the focal point for the year. It is critically important for POR to know what they have in both of these guys before the 2025 draft. Also, Simons' contract timeline (2yrs), makes it more imperative to trade him sooner rather than later if POR wants to maximize return value
2) Williams - IF POR can get something positive back for him (more than (1) 2nd and\or bench fodder) w\o risking playing him, then they should seriously consider it. Otherwise, play him limited\managed minutes and then definitely trade him at the deadline. Also, trading him clears the minutes logjam for Clingan, which needs to happen, he is the #7 pick and he needs to play, not starting year 1 is fine, let Ayton take those minutes, but he needs steady consistent minutes and he is not going to get that behind Ayton\Williams.
3) Grant - The age (in particular), the salary, the playstyle (ISO ball). He probably draws the most trade interest from other teams out of this group, which makes him more likely to be traded. Outside of his scoring, particularly 3pt shot, he really doesn't provide much else. Trading him likely elevates Camara to a starting role and clears the runway for Avdija to be more of a focal point of the team, which IMO makes more sense.
4) Thybulle - While value looks pretty negligible, he may have value to a playoff team, just don't expect a great return. he should be dealt though, just to clear up minutes for younger players like Camara, Walker (RFA) & Murray (don't have much hope there). Any minutes given to Thybulle, take away from younger players and he adds marginal\no value to this team
5) Ayton - Obviously, he is not worth his current salary, contract is up in 2 years. Not a good screen-setter (kind of an important skill for any team, let alone a team with a PG like Scoot), among other issues. However, he puts up steady points\boards, he gives Clingan 1-2 years to acclimate to an NBA starting role\minutes (hopefully) & his trade value is probably suppressed right now. If some team offers something of notable worth (1st round pick, young players) then absolutely deal him, but otherwise keep him around
Wizenheimer wrote:Walton1one wrote:zzaj wrote:
While I agree that Grant should be traded, for me he's a little bit down the to-do list. He's not blocking anyone's development and he'll be a good outlet for both Scoot and Deni. Potentially Clingan, too...
IMO, Simons contract, and everything surrounding his end of season comments and Cronin's snub make him the #1 on the trade block. Gotta get in front of that before his value plummets even further than it already is...which is pretty low.
I agree.
Priority should be:
1) Simons - Trading him clears up the back-court issue, it puts\makes the Scoot\Sharpe tandem the focal point for the year. It is critically important for POR to know what they have in both of these guys before the 2025 draft. Also, Simons' contract timeline (2yrs), makes it more imperative to trade him sooner rather than later if POR wants to maximize return value
2) Williams - IF POR can get something positive back for him (more than (1) 2nd and\or bench fodder) w\o risking playing him, then they should seriously consider it. Otherwise, play him limited\managed minutes and then definitely trade him at the deadline. Also, trading him clears the minutes logjam for Clingan, which needs to happen, he is the #7 pick and he needs to play, not starting year 1 is fine, let Ayton take those minutes, but he needs steady consistent minutes and he is not going to get that behind Ayton\Williams.
3) Grant - The age (in particular), the salary, the playstyle (ISO ball). He probably draws the most trade interest from other teams out of this group, which makes him more likely to be traded. Outside of his scoring, particularly 3pt shot, he really doesn't provide much else. Trading him likely elevates Camara to a starting role and clears the runway for Avdija to be more of a focal point of the team, which IMO makes more sense.
4) Thybulle - While value looks pretty negligible, he may have value to a playoff team, just don't expect a great return. he should be dealt though, just to clear up minutes for younger players like Camara, Walker (RFA) & Murray (don't have much hope there). Any minutes given to Thybulle, take away from younger players and he adds marginal\no value to this team
5) Ayton - Obviously, he is not worth his current salary, contract is up in 2 years. Not a good screen-setter (kind of an important skill for any team, let alone a team with a PG like Scoot), among other issues. However, he puts up steady points\boards, he gives Clingan 1-2 years to acclimate to an NBA starting role\minutes (hopefully) & his trade value is probably suppressed right now. If some team offers something of notable worth (1st round pick, young players) then absolutely deal him, but otherwise keep him around
I'd move Ayton right up there next to Simons
I want both of them long gone before Cronin has a chance to give each 45M/year
BlazersBroncos wrote:I think my best case scenario w/ Ayton is he balls out w/ empty stats this year to the tune of like 24/12 and we find a sucker team to offload him on this summer. Gives us a year to let Donovan to acclimate and we get to sell high on DA.
I think the most likely scenario is he just plays out his contract here and walks though.
Blazers20 wrote:Yikes, Kel’el Ware having a great January (13ppg-7rpg). Did the “Draft Guru” MISS AGAIN? Herro (24-6-5 for the season) a possible all star and instead Blazers got what for Dame (could had got Jovic and Herro possibly). Jovic (13-4-5 for January) also looks to be improving and also is having a good January. Schmitz isn’t much of a draft guru!
Blazers20 wrote:Yikes, Kel’el Ware having a great January (13ppg-7rpg). Did the “Draft Guru” MISS AGAIN? Herro (24-6-5 for the season) a possible all star and instead Blazers got what for Dame (could had got Jovic and Herro possibly). Jovic (13-4-5 for January) also looks to be improving and also is having a good January. Schmitz isn’t much of a draft guru!
Blazers20 wrote:I’m not happy with the Dame trade. I think Cronin overpaid for Deni (I really like Deni). I would had rather have used the 7 and 14 pick on Buzelis and Ware instead of Clingan and trading multiple picks for Deni.
Return to Portland Trail Blazers